Beyond intentions: Transaction uncertainties and developers’ adoption of nonconventional housebuilding technologies

IF 7 1区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Habitat International Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103295
Godwin Kavaarpuo, Piyush Tiwari, Andrew Martel
{"title":"Beyond intentions: Transaction uncertainties and developers’ adoption of nonconventional housebuilding technologies","authors":"Godwin Kavaarpuo,&nbsp;Piyush Tiwari,&nbsp;Andrew Martel","doi":"10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the need for the housing sector to be more innovative, there are limited empirical insights into the influence of uncertainty on innovative housebuilding technology adoption (whether as greenbuilding technologies or otherwise). In exploring the dimensions of uncertainty, this paper asks the following questions: does reducing uncertainty enhance adoption likelihood? Which dimensions of uncertainty, if reduced, will generate significant increases in innovation adoption likelihood among developers? These questions are examined using survey data from residential developers in Ghana and an extended version of transaction cost economics as the theoretical background. We extracted three dimensions of transaction-related uncertainties, which cumulatively explained 62% of the total variance of uncertainty. Only market demand uncertainties were related to adopting four of the six nonconventional walling materials examined. The probability of adopting these technologies increased by 9.3–14.1 percentage points with an increase in predictability of market demand. Increased predictability of housing supply-side conditions did not affect the likelihood of adopting any of the walling technologies. Our findings further reveal a contrast between adoption intentions and actual practices. The findings suggest that innovation policy should address the multidimensional nature of uncertainty concerning the specific technologies it seeks to influence their adoption.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48376,"journal":{"name":"Habitat International","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 103295"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Habitat International","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397525000116","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the need for the housing sector to be more innovative, there are limited empirical insights into the influence of uncertainty on innovative housebuilding technology adoption (whether as greenbuilding technologies or otherwise). In exploring the dimensions of uncertainty, this paper asks the following questions: does reducing uncertainty enhance adoption likelihood? Which dimensions of uncertainty, if reduced, will generate significant increases in innovation adoption likelihood among developers? These questions are examined using survey data from residential developers in Ghana and an extended version of transaction cost economics as the theoretical background. We extracted three dimensions of transaction-related uncertainties, which cumulatively explained 62% of the total variance of uncertainty. Only market demand uncertainties were related to adopting four of the six nonconventional walling materials examined. The probability of adopting these technologies increased by 9.3–14.1 percentage points with an increase in predictability of market demand. Increased predictability of housing supply-side conditions did not affect the likelihood of adopting any of the walling technologies. Our findings further reveal a contrast between adoption intentions and actual practices. The findings suggest that innovation policy should address the multidimensional nature of uncertainty concerning the specific technologies it seeks to influence their adoption.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意图之外:交易的不确定性和开发商对非传统房屋建筑技术的采用
尽管住房部门需要更具创新性,但关于不确定性对创新住房建筑技术采用(无论是绿色建筑技术还是其他技术)的影响的实证见解有限。在探索不确定性的维度时,本文提出了以下问题:减少不确定性是否会提高采用可能性?不确定性的哪个维度,如果减少,将在开发人员中产生创新采用可能性的显著增加?这些问题是用加纳住宅开发商的调查数据和交易成本经济学的扩展版本作为理论背景来检验的。我们提取了交易相关不确定性的三个维度,累计解释了不确定性总方差的62%。只有市场需求的不确定性与采用六种非常规墙体材料中的四种有关。随着市场需求可预测性的提高,采用这些技术的可能性增加了9.3-14.1个百分点。住房供应方面条件的可预测性增加并不影响采用任何墙壁技术的可能性。我们的研究结果进一步揭示了采用意图和实际做法之间的对比。研究结果表明,创新政策应解决其寻求影响具体技术采用的不确定性的多维性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
151
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Habitat International is dedicated to the study of urban and rural human settlements: their planning, design, production and management. Its main focus is on urbanisation in its broadest sense in the developing world. However, increasingly the interrelationships and linkages between cities and towns in the developing and developed worlds are becoming apparent and solutions to the problems that result are urgently required. The economic, social, technological and political systems of the world are intertwined and changes in one region almost always affect other regions.
期刊最新文献
Navigating the interplay of cities and artificial intelligence: Innovation, integration and interpretation Bridging the digital divide for resilient cities: Lessons from Chinese prefectures Merging to equalize: How village and town bank M&A narrows the urban–rural income gap Memory-led sensory gentrification: Sensory governance in the micro-renewal of Minzhu Village, Chongqing Village CEOs as gentrification agents: Gentrification and spatial governance in China's emerging tourism villages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1