Data rule hanging over platform competition: How does the GDPR affect social media market concentration?

IF 3.2 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW Computer Law & Security Review Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106102
Qifan Yang , Yituan Liu
{"title":"Data rule hanging over platform competition: How does the GDPR affect social media market concentration?","authors":"Qifan Yang ,&nbsp;Yituan Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Personal Data protection has become a cornerstone for policy in the digital sphere, significantly influencing the market behaviours of leading social media companies. This paper empirically studies the impact of the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on the social media market concentration in the EU, employing both the synthetic control method and the generalised difference-in-differences method. The findings reveal that the GDPR significantly reduced social media market concentration from 2015 to 2020, with a stronger impact on large companies. However, in the long term, the impact of the GDPR on EU social media market concentration is gradually fading, which has been very weak after 2020. Furthermore, the impact strength of the GDPR on the social media market concentration can be changed by Internet market scales and high technology levels. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of how data protection policies shape the market dynamics of social media companies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51516,"journal":{"name":"Computer Law & Security Review","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 106102"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Law & Security Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364924001675","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Personal Data protection has become a cornerstone for policy in the digital sphere, significantly influencing the market behaviours of leading social media companies. This paper empirically studies the impact of the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on the social media market concentration in the EU, employing both the synthetic control method and the generalised difference-in-differences method. The findings reveal that the GDPR significantly reduced social media market concentration from 2015 to 2020, with a stronger impact on large companies. However, in the long term, the impact of the GDPR on EU social media market concentration is gradually fading, which has been very weak after 2020. Furthermore, the impact strength of the GDPR on the social media market concentration can be changed by Internet market scales and high technology levels. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of how data protection policies shape the market dynamics of social media companies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数据规则笼罩着平台竞争:GDPR如何影响社交媒体市场集中度?
个人数据保护已成为数字领域政策的基石,对领先社交媒体公司的市场行为产生了重大影响。本文采用综合控制法和广义差中差法,实证研究了欧盟《通用数据保护条例》(GDPR)对欧盟社交媒体市场集中度的影响。研究结果显示,从2015年到2020年,GDPR显著降低了社交媒体市场集中度,对大公司的影响更大。但从长期来看,GDPR对欧盟社交媒体市场集中度的影响正在逐渐消退,在2020年之后已经非常微弱。此外,GDPR对社交媒体市场集中度的影响强度会受到互联网市场规模和高技术水平的影响。这些见解有助于更深入地了解数据保护政策如何塑造社交媒体公司的市场动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: CLSR publishes refereed academic and practitioner papers on topics such as Web 2.0, IT security, Identity management, ID cards, RFID, interference with privacy, Internet law, telecoms regulation, online broadcasting, intellectual property, software law, e-commerce, outsourcing, data protection, EU policy, freedom of information, computer security and many other topics. In addition it provides a regular update on European Union developments, national news from more than 20 jurisdictions in both Europe and the Pacific Rim. It is looking for papers within the subject area that display good quality legal analysis and new lines of legal thought or policy development that go beyond mere description of the subject area, however accurate that may be.
期刊最新文献
Anonymising personal data under the data legislative acquis established by the Data Governance Act Incorporating AI incident reporting into telecommunications law and policy: Insights from India If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it? Ten improvements for the upcoming tenth anniversary of the General Data Protection Regulation Artificial intelligence and adjudication: A new pathway to justice in China? Mapping the meaning of human dignity at the European Court of Human Rights: An unsupervised learning approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1