Policy measures to reduce road congestion: What worked?

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Transport & Health Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jth.2025.101984
Paulo Anciaes , Yan Cheng , Stephen John Watkins
{"title":"Policy measures to reduce road congestion: What worked?","authors":"Paulo Anciaes ,&nbsp;Yan Cheng ,&nbsp;Stephen John Watkins","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2025.101984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Road congestion is a persistent problem. Increasing road capacity has not solved this problem, which requires measures to curb road use demand. This paper reviews recent evidence on the effectiveness of different types of policy measures in reducing congestion through reducing road use. The paper answers three questions: 1) what explains the success or failure of measures in reducing congestion?, 2) is the reduction of congestion sustained in the long term?, and 3) are combinations of measures more effective than single measures?.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched the literature for studies assessing the effects of policy measures that aimed at reducing congestion through reducing road use demand.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Restrictions to vehicle ownership tend to reduce congestion, but road use charging and vehicle restrictions are not always effective as road users circumvent the charges or restrictions. Soft measures such as incentives and the provision of information have mostly short-term effects. More evidence is needed on measures affecting fuel prices, high-occupancy vehicle lanes, and parking policies. Measures to reduce road use demand are more effective when combined with measures to improve public transport.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Policies to reduce congestion in the long term need to account for possible adaptations in road user behaviour and provide alternatives to road travel.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 101984"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140525000040","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Road congestion is a persistent problem. Increasing road capacity has not solved this problem, which requires measures to curb road use demand. This paper reviews recent evidence on the effectiveness of different types of policy measures in reducing congestion through reducing road use. The paper answers three questions: 1) what explains the success or failure of measures in reducing congestion?, 2) is the reduction of congestion sustained in the long term?, and 3) are combinations of measures more effective than single measures?.

Methods

We searched the literature for studies assessing the effects of policy measures that aimed at reducing congestion through reducing road use demand.

Results

Restrictions to vehicle ownership tend to reduce congestion, but road use charging and vehicle restrictions are not always effective as road users circumvent the charges or restrictions. Soft measures such as incentives and the provision of information have mostly short-term effects. More evidence is needed on measures affecting fuel prices, high-occupancy vehicle lanes, and parking policies. Measures to reduce road use demand are more effective when combined with measures to improve public transport.

Conclusions

Policies to reduce congestion in the long term need to account for possible adaptations in road user behaviour and provide alternatives to road travel.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少道路挤塞的政策措施:哪些有效?
道路拥堵是一个长期存在的问题。增加道路通行能力并没有解决这个问题,这需要采取措施抑制道路使用需求。本文回顾了最近关于不同类型的政策措施通过减少道路使用来减少拥堵的有效性的证据。本文回答了三个问题:1)如何解释减少拥堵措施的成功或失败?2)交通堵塞的减少是否能长期持续?3)综合措施是否比单一措施更有效?方法:我们检索了评估旨在通过减少道路使用需求来减少拥堵的政策措施效果的文献。结果限制车辆拥有量有利于减少交通拥堵,但道路使用收费和车辆限制并不总是有效的,因为道路使用者会规避收费或限制。诸如激励和提供信息等软措施大多具有短期效果。需要更多证据来证明影响燃油价格、高占用率车道和停车政策的措施。减少道路使用需求的措施,若与改善公共交通的措施相结合,效果会更佳。从长远来看,减少拥堵的政策需要考虑到道路使用者行为的可能适应性,并提供道路旅行的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Exploring perceptions of the barrier effect and their associations with travel mode choice and interactions with neighbours in Santiago, Chile Motion sickness in autonomous driving: Environmental, individual, and time effects Understanding neighborhood walkability perceptions and assessment practices by community: Rural, suburban, and urban settings: A cross-sectional study Eye-tracking and visual processing tests for assessing driving ability in individuals with dementia and mild cognitive impairment: A pilot study Pedestrian fatality in global context: Economic growth, urbanization, and the role of inequality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1