Behind the wheel: Examining the long-term effects of a safe transport education program on driving patterns in older adults

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Transport & Health Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jth.2024.101978
Helen Nguyen , Julie Brown , Lisa Keay , Kristy Coxon
{"title":"Behind the wheel: Examining the long-term effects of a safe transport education program on driving patterns in older adults","authors":"Helen Nguyen ,&nbsp;Julie Brown ,&nbsp;Lisa Keay ,&nbsp;Kristy Coxon","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2024.101978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Safe mobility is key to healthy, active ageing. The ‘Behind the Wheel’ program was designed to promote self-regulation of older drivers' driving habits to help them maintain their safety and preserve their mobility. This study examines changes to driving habits four years after 366 participants completed the ‘Behind the Wheel’ randomised controlled trial.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All 366 participants who completed the original RCT were invited to participate in the follow-up. All participants in the follow-up completed one home visit where information on driving was self-reported using the Driving Habits Questionnaire. The Keele Assessment of Participation measured community participation while depression was defined as a score of ≥2 on the five-item Geriatric Depression Scale. Two odometer readings collected eight weeks apart were used to estimate driving exposure. Between groups differences in driving exposure and self-regulation were analysed using generalised estimating equations and regression models run in R v4.2.2.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>215 participants (mean age = 84 years; 59% of original cohort who completed the RCT) completed the four-year follow-up. Most were still driving with no plans to stop (intervention = 88%, control = 92%). The intervention group was more likely to only drive in their home suburb or local government area than the control (Odds Ratio (OR) 164, 95%Cl 1.03–1.32, adjusted for sex). Most participants in both groups reported using alternative transport in the last month (intervention = 65%, control = 75%, p = 0.05). There were no differences between the two groups on total mileage driven, community participation, crash involvement or depressive symptoms.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Four years after exposure to the education program, older drivers were more likely to restrict their driving to local areas than those who were not exposed. Any effects of older driver education programs on driving patterns may therefore only be noticeable over a long period of time. Further work is needed to balance safe mobility and healthy ageing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 101978"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221414052400224X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Safe mobility is key to healthy, active ageing. The ‘Behind the Wheel’ program was designed to promote self-regulation of older drivers' driving habits to help them maintain their safety and preserve their mobility. This study examines changes to driving habits four years after 366 participants completed the ‘Behind the Wheel’ randomised controlled trial.

Methods

All 366 participants who completed the original RCT were invited to participate in the follow-up. All participants in the follow-up completed one home visit where information on driving was self-reported using the Driving Habits Questionnaire. The Keele Assessment of Participation measured community participation while depression was defined as a score of ≥2 on the five-item Geriatric Depression Scale. Two odometer readings collected eight weeks apart were used to estimate driving exposure. Between groups differences in driving exposure and self-regulation were analysed using generalised estimating equations and regression models run in R v4.2.2.

Results

215 participants (mean age = 84 years; 59% of original cohort who completed the RCT) completed the four-year follow-up. Most were still driving with no plans to stop (intervention = 88%, control = 92%). The intervention group was more likely to only drive in their home suburb or local government area than the control (Odds Ratio (OR) 164, 95%Cl 1.03–1.32, adjusted for sex). Most participants in both groups reported using alternative transport in the last month (intervention = 65%, control = 75%, p = 0.05). There were no differences between the two groups on total mileage driven, community participation, crash involvement or depressive symptoms.

Conclusion

Four years after exposure to the education program, older drivers were more likely to restrict their driving to local areas than those who were not exposed. Any effects of older driver education programs on driving patterns may therefore only be noticeable over a long period of time. Further work is needed to balance safe mobility and healthy ageing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在方向盘后面:检查安全交通教育项目对老年人驾驶模式的长期影响
安全的行动是健康、积极老龄化的关键。“方向盘后面”项目旨在促进老年司机驾驶习惯的自我调节,帮助他们维护安全,保持机动性。这项研究调查了366名参与者完成“开车”随机对照试验四年后驾驶习惯的变化。方法所有完成原始RCT的366名受试者均被邀请参加随访。所有随访的参与者都完成了一次家访,在家访中使用驾驶习惯问卷自我报告驾驶信息。基尔参与评估测量社区参与,而抑郁被定义为在五项老年抑郁量表上得分≥2。相隔八周收集的两个里程表读数用于估计驾驶暴露。使用广义估计方程和在R v4.2.2中运行的回归模型分析各组之间驾驶暴露和自我调节的差异。结果215名参与者(平均年龄84岁;完成RCT的原始队列中有59%的人完成了四年的随访。大多数人仍在开车,不打算停车(干预= 88%,对照组= 92%)。干预组比对照组更倾向于只在他们的家郊区或当地政府所在地开车(优势比(or) 164,95%(1.03-1.32,经性别调整)。两组的大多数参与者都报告在上个月使用过替代交通工具(干预组= 65%,对照组= 75%,p = 0.05)。两组在总驾驶里程、社区参与、车祸参与或抑郁症状方面没有差异。结论接受教育4年后,老年驾驶员比未接受教育的驾驶员更倾向于将驾驶限制在局部区域。因此,老年驾驶员教育计划对驾驶模式的任何影响可能只有在很长一段时间内才会被注意到。需要进一步的工作来平衡安全的流动性和健康的老龄化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Exploring perceptions of the barrier effect and their associations with travel mode choice and interactions with neighbours in Santiago, Chile Motion sickness in autonomous driving: Environmental, individual, and time effects Understanding neighborhood walkability perceptions and assessment practices by community: Rural, suburban, and urban settings: A cross-sectional study Eye-tracking and visual processing tests for assessing driving ability in individuals with dementia and mild cognitive impairment: A pilot study Pedestrian fatality in global context: Economic growth, urbanization, and the role of inequality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1