Behind the wheel: Examining the long-term effects of a safe transport education program on driving patterns in older adults

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Transport & Health Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jth.2024.101978
Helen Nguyen , Julie Brown , Lisa Keay , Kristy Coxon
{"title":"Behind the wheel: Examining the long-term effects of a safe transport education program on driving patterns in older adults","authors":"Helen Nguyen ,&nbsp;Julie Brown ,&nbsp;Lisa Keay ,&nbsp;Kristy Coxon","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2024.101978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Safe mobility is key to healthy, active ageing. The ‘Behind the Wheel’ program was designed to promote self-regulation of older drivers' driving habits to help them maintain their safety and preserve their mobility. This study examines changes to driving habits four years after 366 participants completed the ‘Behind the Wheel’ randomised controlled trial.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All 366 participants who completed the original RCT were invited to participate in the follow-up. All participants in the follow-up completed one home visit where information on driving was self-reported using the Driving Habits Questionnaire. The Keele Assessment of Participation measured community participation while depression was defined as a score of ≥2 on the five-item Geriatric Depression Scale. Two odometer readings collected eight weeks apart were used to estimate driving exposure. Between groups differences in driving exposure and self-regulation were analysed using generalised estimating equations and regression models run in R v4.2.2.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>215 participants (mean age = 84 years; 59% of original cohort who completed the RCT) completed the four-year follow-up. Most were still driving with no plans to stop (intervention = 88%, control = 92%). The intervention group was more likely to only drive in their home suburb or local government area than the control (Odds Ratio (OR) 164, 95%Cl 1.03–1.32, adjusted for sex). Most participants in both groups reported using alternative transport in the last month (intervention = 65%, control = 75%, p = 0.05). There were no differences between the two groups on total mileage driven, community participation, crash involvement or depressive symptoms.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Four years after exposure to the education program, older drivers were more likely to restrict their driving to local areas than those who were not exposed. Any effects of older driver education programs on driving patterns may therefore only be noticeable over a long period of time. Further work is needed to balance safe mobility and healthy ageing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 101978"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221414052400224X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Safe mobility is key to healthy, active ageing. The ‘Behind the Wheel’ program was designed to promote self-regulation of older drivers' driving habits to help them maintain their safety and preserve their mobility. This study examines changes to driving habits four years after 366 participants completed the ‘Behind the Wheel’ randomised controlled trial.

Methods

All 366 participants who completed the original RCT were invited to participate in the follow-up. All participants in the follow-up completed one home visit where information on driving was self-reported using the Driving Habits Questionnaire. The Keele Assessment of Participation measured community participation while depression was defined as a score of ≥2 on the five-item Geriatric Depression Scale. Two odometer readings collected eight weeks apart were used to estimate driving exposure. Between groups differences in driving exposure and self-regulation were analysed using generalised estimating equations and regression models run in R v4.2.2.

Results

215 participants (mean age = 84 years; 59% of original cohort who completed the RCT) completed the four-year follow-up. Most were still driving with no plans to stop (intervention = 88%, control = 92%). The intervention group was more likely to only drive in their home suburb or local government area than the control (Odds Ratio (OR) 164, 95%Cl 1.03–1.32, adjusted for sex). Most participants in both groups reported using alternative transport in the last month (intervention = 65%, control = 75%, p = 0.05). There were no differences between the two groups on total mileage driven, community participation, crash involvement or depressive symptoms.

Conclusion

Four years after exposure to the education program, older drivers were more likely to restrict their driving to local areas than those who were not exposed. Any effects of older driver education programs on driving patterns may therefore only be noticeable over a long period of time. Further work is needed to balance safe mobility and healthy ageing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Under the influence of parents: A longitudinal study of children's walking Integrating user perceptions of socio-emotional aspects in wheelchair design: A pilot study using Kansei Engineering Influence of mobility and technological factors of mobility on the quality of life of older adults: An empirical study focused on mobility as a mediator Healthy ageing and the 15-minute walking environment in the Swedish Arctic communities Commuting mode and university students’ wellbeing: Investigating the role of effort on subjective wellbeing and perceived autonomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1