Public transport investments as generators of economic and social activity

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Transport & Health Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jth.2025.101989
Jacob Albin Korem Alhassan , Paulo Anciaes
{"title":"Public transport investments as generators of economic and social activity","authors":"Jacob Albin Korem Alhassan ,&nbsp;Paulo Anciaes","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2025.101989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>High-quality public transport systems increase accessibility, which is linked to wider economic and social benefits that improve the health of the populations served. This paper reviews evidence on the existence and magnitude of these wider benefits.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched for academic studies that evaluated the effects of specific public transport investments or disinvestments on levels of economic and social activity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Public transport improvements increase economic activity, both at an aggregate level (higher gross domestic product) and household level (higher income), although the effect can be geographically imbalanced. Better public transport boosts employment but tends to increase house prices, leading to gentrification, although suitable policies can prevent this effect. Public transport improves social connections, especially for older people in isolated rural areas. In urban areas, it can reduce connections due to barriers to pedestrians. Disinvestment in public transport, such as closure of bus services, has multiple economic and social costs, although the evidence is still scarce.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Public transport has potentially wide but possibly unequal economic and social benefits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 101989"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221414052500009X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

High-quality public transport systems increase accessibility, which is linked to wider economic and social benefits that improve the health of the populations served. This paper reviews evidence on the existence and magnitude of these wider benefits.

Methods

We searched for academic studies that evaluated the effects of specific public transport investments or disinvestments on levels of economic and social activity.

Results

Public transport improvements increase economic activity, both at an aggregate level (higher gross domestic product) and household level (higher income), although the effect can be geographically imbalanced. Better public transport boosts employment but tends to increase house prices, leading to gentrification, although suitable policies can prevent this effect. Public transport improves social connections, especially for older people in isolated rural areas. In urban areas, it can reduce connections due to barriers to pedestrians. Disinvestment in public transport, such as closure of bus services, has multiple economic and social costs, although the evidence is still scarce.

Conclusions

Public transport has potentially wide but possibly unequal economic and social benefits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共交通投资是经济和社会活动的推动者
高质量的公共交通系统增加了可达性,这与改善所服务人群健康的更广泛的经济和社会效益有关。本文回顾了这些更广泛的利益的存在和规模的证据。方法:我们检索了评估特定公共交通投资或撤资对经济和社会活动水平影响的学术研究。结果公共交通的改善增加了经济活动,无论是在总体水平(更高的国内生产总值)还是家庭水平(更高的收入),尽管这种影响在地理上是不平衡的。更好的公共交通促进了就业,但往往会提高房价,导致中产阶级化,尽管适当的政策可以防止这种影响。公共交通改善了社会联系,特别是对偏远农村地区的老年人而言。在城市地区,由于行人的障碍,它可以减少连接。公共交通领域的撤资,如关闭公共汽车服务,具有多重经济和社会成本,尽管证据仍然很少。结论公共交通具有广泛但不均衡的经济效益和社会效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Exploring perceptions of the barrier effect and their associations with travel mode choice and interactions with neighbours in Santiago, Chile Motion sickness in autonomous driving: Environmental, individual, and time effects Understanding neighborhood walkability perceptions and assessment practices by community: Rural, suburban, and urban settings: A cross-sectional study Eye-tracking and visual processing tests for assessing driving ability in individuals with dementia and mild cognitive impairment: A pilot study Pedestrian fatality in global context: Economic growth, urbanization, and the role of inequality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1