A meta-review of literature reviews of disability, travel and inequalities

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Transport & Health Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.jth.2024.101961
Jennifer S. Mindell , Roger L. Mackett , Steve Yaffe , Sewa Amin
{"title":"A meta-review of literature reviews of disability, travel and inequalities","authors":"Jennifer S. Mindell ,&nbsp;Roger L. Mackett ,&nbsp;Steve Yaffe ,&nbsp;Sewa Amin","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2024.101961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The importance of travel for mental and physical health and the adverse impacts of transport on health are increasingly recognised in policy and practice, but less attention is paid to the effects of disability on the ability to travel.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched the TRID database on June 1, 2023, using abstract keywords ‘disability’ or ‘disabilities’. We used the index term ‘literature reviews’ in 'all publications' from 2019 to 2023 inclusive. We also searched the journal <em>Transport Reviews</em>, finding six reviews, and were informed of two additional reviews. We repeated the search in July 2024, using Google Scholar. Forty-three unique recent reviews examined travellers with physical or cognitive disabilities; 24 met our inclusion criteria and underwent quality appraisal.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Travel behaviour differs between transport users with and without disabilities. Those with disabilities make 10–30% fewer trips. They tend to use different transport modes and travel to nearer destinations but their journeys often take more time, are more complex, and can cost more. Individuals with disabilities are less able to travel both locally and regionally. This reduces independence, increases unemployment, and leads to missed medical appointments. Travel barriers vary with type and severity of disability, socioeconomic status, and transport infrastructure quality. People with disabilities often use familiar routes for comfort. Systemic obstacles include public transport unreliability; long waiting times; maintenance issues (e.g. pavement [sidewalk] maintenance, vehicle accessibility equipment); accessibility and affordability; and poor access to technology and information. Training for people with disabilities and transport staff is beneficial.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities highlights the importance of transport to help people with disabilities access the same services, goods, and people as other people. Taking a universal design approach benefits everyone. Barriers can be overcome with accessibility policies integral to the transport planning process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 101961"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221414052400207X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The importance of travel for mental and physical health and the adverse impacts of transport on health are increasingly recognised in policy and practice, but less attention is paid to the effects of disability on the ability to travel.

Methods

We searched the TRID database on June 1, 2023, using abstract keywords ‘disability’ or ‘disabilities’. We used the index term ‘literature reviews’ in 'all publications' from 2019 to 2023 inclusive. We also searched the journal Transport Reviews, finding six reviews, and were informed of two additional reviews. We repeated the search in July 2024, using Google Scholar. Forty-three unique recent reviews examined travellers with physical or cognitive disabilities; 24 met our inclusion criteria and underwent quality appraisal.

Results

Travel behaviour differs between transport users with and without disabilities. Those with disabilities make 10–30% fewer trips. They tend to use different transport modes and travel to nearer destinations but their journeys often take more time, are more complex, and can cost more. Individuals with disabilities are less able to travel both locally and regionally. This reduces independence, increases unemployment, and leads to missed medical appointments. Travel barriers vary with type and severity of disability, socioeconomic status, and transport infrastructure quality. People with disabilities often use familiar routes for comfort. Systemic obstacles include public transport unreliability; long waiting times; maintenance issues (e.g. pavement [sidewalk] maintenance, vehicle accessibility equipment); accessibility and affordability; and poor access to technology and information. Training for people with disabilities and transport staff is beneficial.

Conclusions

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities highlights the importance of transport to help people with disabilities access the same services, goods, and people as other people. Taking a universal design approach benefits everyone. Barriers can be overcome with accessibility policies integral to the transport planning process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于残疾、旅行和不平等的文献综述
政策和实践日益认识到旅行对身心健康的重要性以及交通对健康的不利影响,但对残疾对旅行能力的影响关注较少。方法于2023年6月1日检索TRID数据库,检索关键词为“残障”或“残疾”。我们在2019年至2023年(含2023年)的“所有出版物”中使用了索引术语“文献综述”。我们还搜索了《运输评论》杂志,找到了6篇评论,并获知了另外两篇评论。我们在2024年7月使用谷歌Scholar重复了搜索。43项独特的近期评论审查了身体或认知残疾的旅行者;24例符合纳入标准并进行了质量评价。结果残疾和非残疾乘客的出行行为存在差异。残疾人的出行次数减少了10-30%。他们倾向于使用不同的交通方式,前往更近的目的地,但他们的旅程往往需要更多的时间,更复杂,也可能花费更多。残疾人在当地和地区旅行的能力较差。这降低了独立性,增加了失业率,并导致错过了医疗预约。旅行障碍因残疾的类型和严重程度、社会经济地位和交通基础设施质量而异。残障人士经常走熟悉的路线,以求舒适。系统性障碍包括公共交通不可靠;等待时间长;维护问题(例如路面[人行道]维护,车辆无障碍设备);可及性和可负担性;难以获得技术和信息。对残疾人和交通工作人员的培训是有益的。联合国《残疾人权利公约》强调了交通对于帮助残疾人获得与其他人相同的服务、物品和人员的重要性。采用通用设计方法对每个人都有好处。交通规划过程中不可或缺的无障碍政策可以克服障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Exploring perceptions of the barrier effect and their associations with travel mode choice and interactions with neighbours in Santiago, Chile Motion sickness in autonomous driving: Environmental, individual, and time effects Understanding neighborhood walkability perceptions and assessment practices by community: Rural, suburban, and urban settings: A cross-sectional study Eye-tracking and visual processing tests for assessing driving ability in individuals with dementia and mild cognitive impairment: A pilot study Pedestrian fatality in global context: Economic growth, urbanization, and the role of inequality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1