Are e-scooters active transport? Measured physical activity outputs of e-scooter riding vs walking

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Transport & Health Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-07 DOI:10.1016/j.jth.2024.101963
Christopher Payne, Samuel A. Smith, Ashleen Sappal, Rushil Boorgula, Katrina A. Taylor
{"title":"Are e-scooters active transport? Measured physical activity outputs of e-scooter riding vs walking","authors":"Christopher Payne,&nbsp;Samuel A. Smith,&nbsp;Ashleen Sappal,&nbsp;Rushil Boorgula,&nbsp;Katrina A. Taylor","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2024.101963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>E-scooters have been adopted into the urban transportation network as a convenient, environmentally friendly, and low-cost mode of transportation intended to reduce vehicle dependence over short distances. However, there is a concern that e-scooters displace active modes of transport such as walking and therefore have the potential to negatively impact physical activity (PA), health and well-being. Currently, limited evidence exists to accurately quantify energy expenditure, and physiological and psychological responses to an acute bout of e-scooter riding.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study compared a 15-minute bout of e-scooter riding to time-matched resting and walking conditions using a randomised crossover trial conducted in a controlled laboratory setting. The resting condition was performed in a supine position, and both e-scooter and walking were performed on a motorised treadmill. Cardiorespiratory measures were recorded for each condition using online gas analysis, and the metabolic equivalent of task (MET) minutes were used to determine energy expenditure. Subjective experience was also measured post-walking and e-scooter conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>15 minutes of walking yielded significantly greater MET minutes (55 ± 7 MET-min) compared to both resting (15 ± 4 MET-min, P &lt; 0.001, d = 7.38) and e-scooter (24 ± 6 MET-min, P &lt; 0.001, d = 5.18) conditions. Psychological well-being was significantly greater (P &lt; 0.001, d = 0.648) following walking (19.2 ± 4.1) compared to e-scooter (17.1 ± 4.5). Psychological distress (P = 0.40) was significantly lower post-walking (5.0 ± 1.8) compared to e-scooter (5.8 ± 2.6).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In a controlled laboratory environment, riding an e-scooter resulted in significantly less energy expenditure and elicited an unfavourable psychological response compared to walking. Regular e-scooter use could displace PA participation and increase physical inactivity with resultant negative health consequences. PA engagement and health guidelines should be considered in the strategic development of electric micro-mobility transportation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 101963"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140524002093","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

E-scooters have been adopted into the urban transportation network as a convenient, environmentally friendly, and low-cost mode of transportation intended to reduce vehicle dependence over short distances. However, there is a concern that e-scooters displace active modes of transport such as walking and therefore have the potential to negatively impact physical activity (PA), health and well-being. Currently, limited evidence exists to accurately quantify energy expenditure, and physiological and psychological responses to an acute bout of e-scooter riding.

Methods

This study compared a 15-minute bout of e-scooter riding to time-matched resting and walking conditions using a randomised crossover trial conducted in a controlled laboratory setting. The resting condition was performed in a supine position, and both e-scooter and walking were performed on a motorised treadmill. Cardiorespiratory measures were recorded for each condition using online gas analysis, and the metabolic equivalent of task (MET) minutes were used to determine energy expenditure. Subjective experience was also measured post-walking and e-scooter conditions.

Results

15 minutes of walking yielded significantly greater MET minutes (55 ± 7 MET-min) compared to both resting (15 ± 4 MET-min, P < 0.001, d = 7.38) and e-scooter (24 ± 6 MET-min, P < 0.001, d = 5.18) conditions. Psychological well-being was significantly greater (P < 0.001, d = 0.648) following walking (19.2 ± 4.1) compared to e-scooter (17.1 ± 4.5). Psychological distress (P = 0.40) was significantly lower post-walking (5.0 ± 1.8) compared to e-scooter (5.8 ± 2.6).

Conclusion

In a controlled laboratory environment, riding an e-scooter resulted in significantly less energy expenditure and elicited an unfavourable psychological response compared to walking. Regular e-scooter use could displace PA participation and increase physical inactivity with resultant negative health consequences. PA engagement and health guidelines should be considered in the strategic development of electric micro-mobility transportation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电动滑板车是主动交通工具吗?测量骑电动滑板车与步行的体力活动输出
电动滑板车作为一种方便、环保、低成本的交通方式已被纳入城市交通网络,旨在减少对短距离车辆的依赖。然而,有人担心电动滑板车取代了步行等主动交通方式,因此有可能对身体活动(PA)、健康和福祉产生负面影响。目前,有限的证据存在,以准确地量化能量消耗,以及生理和心理反应的电动滑板车急性发作。方法:本研究通过在受控实验室环境中进行的随机交叉试验,将15分钟的电动滑板车骑行与时间匹配的休息和步行条件进行比较。休息状态为仰卧位,电动滑板车和步行均在电动跑步机上进行。使用在线气体分析记录每种情况下的心肺测量,并使用代谢当量任务(MET)分钟来确定能量消耗。主观体验也被测量后步行和电动滑板车的条件。结果:与休息(15±4 MET-min)相比,步行15分钟产生的MET分钟(55±7 MET-min)显著增加。0.001, d = 7.38)和电动滑板车(24±6 MET-min, P <;0.001, d = 5.18)条件。心理健康水平显著提高(P <;0.001, d = 0.648),与电动滑板车(17.1±4.5)相比,步行(19.2±4.1)。步行后的心理困扰(5.0±1.8)明显低于电动滑板车(5.8±2.6),P = 0.40。结论在受控的实验环境中,与步行相比,骑电动滑板车的能量消耗明显减少,并引起不利的心理反应。经常使用电动滑板车可能会取代PA的参与,增加缺乏身体活动,从而对健康产生负面影响。在电动微机动交通的战略发展中,应考虑PA的参与和健康指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Exploring perceptions of the barrier effect and their associations with travel mode choice and interactions with neighbours in Santiago, Chile Motion sickness in autonomous driving: Environmental, individual, and time effects Understanding neighborhood walkability perceptions and assessment practices by community: Rural, suburban, and urban settings: A cross-sectional study Eye-tracking and visual processing tests for assessing driving ability in individuals with dementia and mild cognitive impairment: A pilot study Pedestrian fatality in global context: Economic growth, urbanization, and the role of inequality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1