Identifying disparities in the relationship between neighborhood walkability and active transportation safety within South Carolina

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Transport & Health Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jth.2024.101960
Anna L. Chupak , Shirelle H. Hallum , Farnaz Hesam Shariati , Erin Looney , Andrew T. Kaczynski
{"title":"Identifying disparities in the relationship between neighborhood walkability and active transportation safety within South Carolina","authors":"Anna L. Chupak ,&nbsp;Shirelle H. Hallum ,&nbsp;Farnaz Hesam Shariati ,&nbsp;Erin Looney ,&nbsp;Andrew T. Kaczynski","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2024.101960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Active transportation crashes are of great concern in the Southeast U.S., especially within disadvantaged neighborhoods with poor infrastructure. Little research has evaluated how characteristics of the built environment are associated with active transportation safety, or how this association may differ by neighborhood disadvantage. This study examined the relationship between neighborhood walkability and pedestrian and cyclist crashes, including variations by social vulnerability across census tracts in South Carolina (SC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Four key variables were collected for each census tract in SC (N = 1103): walkability, pedestrian and cyclist crashes, and social vulnerability. The Environmental Protection Agency's National Walkability Index (NWI) scores were averaged across block groups to determine walkability per tract. Pedestrian (N = 10,689) and cyclist (N = 4802) crash count and severity were obtained from SCDOT [2011–2021], aggregated per tract, and adjusted for average trips per day. Social vulnerability, the degree of susceptibility of a community to hazards, was measured by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Social Vulnerability Index (SVI); higher percentile rankings indicate greater SV. Hierarchical linear regressions were conducted to determine the relationship between walkability and pedestrian and cyclist crash count and severity, including moderation by SV.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Across all SC census tracts, there was a significant, negative relationship between walkability and pedestrian and cyclist crash count (b = −0.005,SE = 0.001; b = −0.020,SE = 0.003) and severity (b = 1.073,SE = 0.193; b = −2.831,SE = 0.492) per trip. Further, greater walkability within tracts at high compared to low SV levels, was especially associated with fewer and less severe crashes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Worsened walkability was associated with greater and more severe active transportation crashes, significantly varying by SV. These findings help identify neighborhoods in SC in need of infrastructure improvements to address active transportation safety, thereby facilitating greater physical activity and reducing chronic disease.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 101960"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140524002068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Active transportation crashes are of great concern in the Southeast U.S., especially within disadvantaged neighborhoods with poor infrastructure. Little research has evaluated how characteristics of the built environment are associated with active transportation safety, or how this association may differ by neighborhood disadvantage. This study examined the relationship between neighborhood walkability and pedestrian and cyclist crashes, including variations by social vulnerability across census tracts in South Carolina (SC).

Methods

Four key variables were collected for each census tract in SC (N = 1103): walkability, pedestrian and cyclist crashes, and social vulnerability. The Environmental Protection Agency's National Walkability Index (NWI) scores were averaged across block groups to determine walkability per tract. Pedestrian (N = 10,689) and cyclist (N = 4802) crash count and severity were obtained from SCDOT [2011–2021], aggregated per tract, and adjusted for average trips per day. Social vulnerability, the degree of susceptibility of a community to hazards, was measured by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Social Vulnerability Index (SVI); higher percentile rankings indicate greater SV. Hierarchical linear regressions were conducted to determine the relationship between walkability and pedestrian and cyclist crash count and severity, including moderation by SV.

Results

Across all SC census tracts, there was a significant, negative relationship between walkability and pedestrian and cyclist crash count (b = −0.005,SE = 0.001; b = −0.020,SE = 0.003) and severity (b = 1.073,SE = 0.193; b = −2.831,SE = 0.492) per trip. Further, greater walkability within tracts at high compared to low SV levels, was especially associated with fewer and less severe crashes.

Conclusion

Worsened walkability was associated with greater and more severe active transportation crashes, significantly varying by SV. These findings help identify neighborhoods in SC in need of infrastructure improvements to address active transportation safety, thereby facilitating greater physical activity and reducing chronic disease.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
识别南卡罗来纳社区步行性和主动交通安全之间关系的差异
主动交通事故在美国东南部备受关注,尤其是在基础设施薄弱的弱势社区。很少有研究评估建筑环境的特征如何与主动交通安全相关联,或者这种关联如何因社区劣势而不同。本研究考察了社区步行性与行人和骑自行车者碰撞之间的关系,包括南卡罗来纳州人口普查区的社会脆弱性变化。方法收集SC每个人口普查区(N = 1103)的4个关键变量:步行性、行人和骑自行车的交通事故和社会脆弱性。环境保护署的国家步行指数(NWI)得分在各个街区组中取平均值,以确定每个街区的步行性。行人(N = 10,689)和骑自行车者(N = 4802)的碰撞计数和严重程度来自SCDOT[2011-2021],按路段汇总,并根据每天的平均出行次数进行调整。社会脆弱性,即一个社区对危害的易感性程度,由疾病控制和预防中心的社会脆弱性指数(SVI)衡量;百分位排名越高表明SV越大。通过层次线性回归来确定步行性与行人和骑自行车者碰撞次数和严重程度之间的关系,包括SV的缓和。结果在所有SC人口普查区中,步行能力与行人和骑自行车的人碰撞次数呈显著负相关(b = - 0.005,SE = 0.001;b =−0.020 SE = 0.003)和严重性(b = 1.073, SE = 0.193;b =−2.831,SE = 0.492)。此外,与低SV水平相比,在高SV水平的区域内,更大的步行性与更少和更少的严重碰撞有关。结论可步行性恶化与主动式交通碰撞的严重程度相关,且因交通流量而有显著差异。这些发现有助于确定南卡罗来纳州需要改善基础设施的社区,以解决主动交通安全问题,从而促进更多的身体活动并减少慢性疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Exploring perceptions of the barrier effect and their associations with travel mode choice and interactions with neighbours in Santiago, Chile Motion sickness in autonomous driving: Environmental, individual, and time effects Understanding neighborhood walkability perceptions and assessment practices by community: Rural, suburban, and urban settings: A cross-sectional study Eye-tracking and visual processing tests for assessing driving ability in individuals with dementia and mild cognitive impairment: A pilot study Pedestrian fatality in global context: Economic growth, urbanization, and the role of inequality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1