Biogenic amine testing in the South African public health care system

IF 1.3 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Practical Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1016/j.plabm.2025.e00457
D. Legg-E’Silva , E.M. Cave , T. Snyman, S. Currin, N. Kone, K.L. Prigge
{"title":"Biogenic amine testing in the South African public health care system","authors":"D. Legg-E’Silva ,&nbsp;E.M. Cave ,&nbsp;T. Snyman,&nbsp;S. Currin,&nbsp;N. Kone,&nbsp;K.L. Prigge","doi":"10.1016/j.plabm.2025.e00457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Phaeochromocytoma, paraganglioma and neuroblastoma are catecholamine secreting neuroendocrine tumours. Biochemical screening for suspected cases of these tumours involves the measurement of catecholamines and their metabolites in either urine or plasma. The South African National Health Laboratory service (NHLS) measures urine fractionated metanephrines (UMF) and normetanephrines (UNF), urine vanillylmandelic acid (UVMA) and urine homovanillic acid (UHVA).</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To analyse the demographic, biochemical and testing patterns of patients’ UMF, UNF, UVMA and UHVA in the NHLS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from January 2015 to December 2016 for all patients undergoing UMF, UNF, UVMA and UHVA testing was extracted from the NHLS central data warehouse. Neuroendocrine tumours were biochemically diagnosed when results were &gt;2x multiples of the upper reference limits. Multiple testing was defined as ≥2 tests within a 14-day period. Ethnicity was determined through hot-deck imputation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Biochemically abnormal test results were identified by UMF/UNF measurements in 98.2 % of cases. In 1.8 % of cases, the addition of UVMA resulted in a previously unidentified biochemical positive. Adult white and coloured populations have significantly less biochemically positive UMF results compared to the African population. Multiple testing resulted in discordant results for 12.8 % of UMF and 13.1 % of UNF testing.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>UVMA testing for phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma offers little benefit over testing with UMF alone. Requesting consecutive multiple samples is preferred, however, a single 24-h fractionated UMF/UNF is efficient and cost-effective for phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma screening, with further testing recommended when clinically indicated. African individuals are more likely to have raised catecholamines and requires further investigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20421,"journal":{"name":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article e00457"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551725000101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Phaeochromocytoma, paraganglioma and neuroblastoma are catecholamine secreting neuroendocrine tumours. Biochemical screening for suspected cases of these tumours involves the measurement of catecholamines and their metabolites in either urine or plasma. The South African National Health Laboratory service (NHLS) measures urine fractionated metanephrines (UMF) and normetanephrines (UNF), urine vanillylmandelic acid (UVMA) and urine homovanillic acid (UHVA).

Objectives

To analyse the demographic, biochemical and testing patterns of patients’ UMF, UNF, UVMA and UHVA in the NHLS.

Methods

Data from January 2015 to December 2016 for all patients undergoing UMF, UNF, UVMA and UHVA testing was extracted from the NHLS central data warehouse. Neuroendocrine tumours were biochemically diagnosed when results were >2x multiples of the upper reference limits. Multiple testing was defined as ≥2 tests within a 14-day period. Ethnicity was determined through hot-deck imputation.

Results

Biochemically abnormal test results were identified by UMF/UNF measurements in 98.2 % of cases. In 1.8 % of cases, the addition of UVMA resulted in a previously unidentified biochemical positive. Adult white and coloured populations have significantly less biochemically positive UMF results compared to the African population. Multiple testing resulted in discordant results for 12.8 % of UMF and 13.1 % of UNF testing.

Conclusion

UVMA testing for phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma offers little benefit over testing with UMF alone. Requesting consecutive multiple samples is preferred, however, a single 24-h fractionated UMF/UNF is efficient and cost-effective for phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma screening, with further testing recommended when clinically indicated. African individuals are more likely to have raised catecholamines and requires further investigation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非公共卫生保健系统中的生物胺检测
背景嗜铬细胞瘤、副神经节瘤和神经母细胞瘤是分泌儿茶酚胺的神经内分泌肿瘤。对这些肿瘤疑似病例的生化筛查包括测量尿液或血浆中的儿茶酚胺及其代谢物。南非国家卫生实验室服务(NHLS)测量尿分离肾上腺素(UMF)和去甲肾上腺素(UNF)、尿香草酸(UVMA)和尿同型香草酸(UHVA)。目的分析国家健康保险系统患者UMF、UNF、UVMA和UHVA的人口学、生化和检测模式。方法从NHLS中央数据仓库中提取2015年1月至2016年12月所有接受UMF、UNF、UVMA和UHVA检测的患者的数据。当结果为参考上限的2倍时,生物化学诊断神经内分泌肿瘤。多次检测定义为14天内≥2次检测。种族是通过热甲板归罪法确定的。结果98.2%的病例通过UMF/UNF检测发现生化异常。在1.8%的病例中,UVMA的加入导致了先前未知的生化阳性。与非洲人口相比,成年白人和有色人种的生物化学阳性UMF结果明显较少。多重测试导致12.8%的UMF和13.1%的UNF测试结果不一致。结论uvma检测对嗜铬细胞瘤和副神经节瘤的检测效果与单独使用UMF检测相比效果不大。然而,对于嗜铬细胞瘤和副神经节瘤筛查而言,单个24小时分离UMF/UNF是高效且经济的,临床需要时建议进行进一步检测。非洲人更有可能产生儿茶酚胺,这需要进一步的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Practical Laboratory Medicine
Practical Laboratory Medicine Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: Practical Laboratory Medicine is a high-quality, peer-reviewed, international open-access journal publishing original research, new methods and critical evaluations, case reports and short papers in the fields of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. The objective of the journal is to provide practical information of immediate relevance to workers in clinical laboratories. The primary scope of the journal covers clinical chemistry, hematology, molecular biology and genetics relevant to laboratory medicine, microbiology, immunology, therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology, laboratory management and informatics. We welcome papers which describe critical evaluations of biomarkers and their role in the diagnosis and treatment of clinically significant disease, validation of commercial and in-house IVD methods, method comparisons, interference reports, the development of new reagents and reference materials, reference range studies and regulatory compliance reports. Manuscripts describing the development of new methods applicable to laboratory medicine (including point-of-care testing) are particularly encouraged, even if preliminary or small scale.
期刊最新文献
A complete blood count-based machine learning model for rapid differentiation of aplastic anemia, immune thrombocytopenia, and myelodysplastic syndromes in routine clinical practice Biochemical deciphering of an Atypical methemoglobinemia A comparative study of the quality control efficacy of multiple error-introduction methods for patient-based real-time quality control Lipemia-induced pseudohyponatremia: Analytical bias beyond manufacturer claims Isothermal nucleic acid amplification techniques: A comprehensive overview on their principle & applications as alternative to PCR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1