Risk factors associated with adverse medication events reported by nurses in a Pediatric Hospital in Mexico

Rosa María Hidalgo-Velasco RN , Graciela Martínez-Velasco RN , Martha Martínez-Salazar PhD , Karina Juárez-González MSc , Salvador Vázquez-Vega PhD
{"title":"Risk factors associated with adverse medication events reported by nurses in a Pediatric Hospital in Mexico","authors":"Rosa María Hidalgo-Velasco RN ,&nbsp;Graciela Martínez-Velasco RN ,&nbsp;Martha Martínez-Salazar PhD ,&nbsp;Karina Juárez-González MSc ,&nbsp;Salvador Vázquez-Vega PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.enfie.2025.100492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>During pediatric medication administration, patient safety-related incidents such as sentinel event, adverse event or quasi-failure still occur.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To identify risk factors associated with adverse events during the medication of pediatric patients reported by nurses.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Cross-sectional study, non-probabilistic sampling. From January to October 2021, 411 reports from the Vencer II System were reviewed, of which only 140 reported notifications of incidents during the medication of pediatric patients. Using Root Cause Analysis 38 factors associated with adverse events were investigated. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 411 reports reviewed, 140 (34.0%) correspond to incidents; 116 (83.0%) to adverse events and 24 (17.0%) to quasi-failure, no sentinel events were reported. In the human factor, six of the seven proximal factors had a frequency ≥ 40%. Work overload was significantly associated with the occurrence of adverse events; OR = 3.24 (95% CI [1.31–7.99]) (p = 0.008). Contrary to what has been reported, LASA (Look-Alike, Sound-Alike) medications and double-check omission were identified as protective against the occurrence of incidents; OR = 0.323 (95% CI [0.13−0.84]) (p = 0.017); OR = 0.39 (95% CI [0.15−0.99]) (p = 0.047).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Work overload was identified as a risk factor associated with the occurrence of adverse events, so it is necessary to evaluate this factor from objective medication and from the nurses' perception of it. Having a documented incident notification and response system in place will allow healthcare institutions to demonstrate diligence and transparency. Finally, the usefulness of Root Cause Analysis and the Ishikawa Diagram to identify factors that can cause incidents is again supported, so their integration into the VENCER II instrument would be useful.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93991,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria intensiva","volume":"36 1","pages":"Article 100492"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2529984025000059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

During pediatric medication administration, patient safety-related incidents such as sentinel event, adverse event or quasi-failure still occur.

Objective

To identify risk factors associated with adverse events during the medication of pediatric patients reported by nurses.

Methods

Cross-sectional study, non-probabilistic sampling. From January to October 2021, 411 reports from the Vencer II System were reviewed, of which only 140 reported notifications of incidents during the medication of pediatric patients. Using Root Cause Analysis 38 factors associated with adverse events were investigated. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used.

Results

Of the 411 reports reviewed, 140 (34.0%) correspond to incidents; 116 (83.0%) to adverse events and 24 (17.0%) to quasi-failure, no sentinel events were reported. In the human factor, six of the seven proximal factors had a frequency ≥ 40%. Work overload was significantly associated with the occurrence of adverse events; OR = 3.24 (95% CI [1.31–7.99]) (p = 0.008). Contrary to what has been reported, LASA (Look-Alike, Sound-Alike) medications and double-check omission were identified as protective against the occurrence of incidents; OR = 0.323 (95% CI [0.13−0.84]) (p = 0.017); OR = 0.39 (95% CI [0.15−0.99]) (p = 0.047).

Conclusions

Work overload was identified as a risk factor associated with the occurrence of adverse events, so it is necessary to evaluate this factor from objective medication and from the nurses' perception of it. Having a documented incident notification and response system in place will allow healthcare institutions to demonstrate diligence and transparency. Finally, the usefulness of Root Cause Analysis and the Ishikawa Diagram to identify factors that can cause incidents is again supported, so their integration into the VENCER II instrument would be useful.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Electrophisiological monitoring of pain in non-communicative critically ill patients Nurses' role in spiritual care for patients and families in intensive care units: A scoping review Experience of an advanced practice nurse in an intensive care unit Quality of work life and intention to rotate in intensive care nurses. Cross-sectional study Parent experiences of child loss in a paediatric intensive care unit on human connection and compassionate care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1