Implementation fidelity of video-feedback coaching for communication partners of individuals with congenital deafblindness

Q1 Social Sciences International journal of educational research open Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100428
Marianne Rorije , Saskia Damen , Marleen J. Janssen , Alexander Minnaert
{"title":"Implementation fidelity of video-feedback coaching for communication partners of individuals with congenital deafblindness","authors":"Marianne Rorije ,&nbsp;Saskia Damen ,&nbsp;Marleen J. Janssen ,&nbsp;Alexander Minnaert","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Video-feedback (VF) coaching is considered to be an effective part of interventions that aim to improve interactions between individuals with deafblindness and their communication partners. However, there is a lack of research on how VF coaching is implemented and the extent to which such implementation adheres to the designed intervention. Implementation fidelity is essential to successfully applying evidence-based practices, but a certain flexibility is needed to tailor interventions to individual circumstances. This study examined the process of implementing the newly developed Influencing Communication and Language (IC&amp;L) intervention. It focused on implementation fidelity and the adherence and moderator elements described in Carroll et al.’s (2007) conceptual framework. Four coaches and thirteen communication partners participated in the study. Multiple data sources were used to examine the extent to which the coaches adhered to the content and dose of the VF coaching sessions as designed in the IC&amp;L intervention and how potential moderators played a role in coaches’ implementation of the VF coaching sessions. The study underscores the importance of flexibility and adaptation in implementing the IC&amp;L intervention. The variability in adherence and strategy use among coaches highlights the necessity of tailored approaches based on the specific needs and experiences of communication partners. Additionally, the intervention generally lasted longer than intended, primarily due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite challenges mostly related to the intervention's complexity, the IC&amp;L intervention was overall well received and effectively implemented.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73445,"journal":{"name":"International journal of educational research open","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100428"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of educational research open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374024001092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Video-feedback (VF) coaching is considered to be an effective part of interventions that aim to improve interactions between individuals with deafblindness and their communication partners. However, there is a lack of research on how VF coaching is implemented and the extent to which such implementation adheres to the designed intervention. Implementation fidelity is essential to successfully applying evidence-based practices, but a certain flexibility is needed to tailor interventions to individual circumstances. This study examined the process of implementing the newly developed Influencing Communication and Language (IC&L) intervention. It focused on implementation fidelity and the adherence and moderator elements described in Carroll et al.’s (2007) conceptual framework. Four coaches and thirteen communication partners participated in the study. Multiple data sources were used to examine the extent to which the coaches adhered to the content and dose of the VF coaching sessions as designed in the IC&L intervention and how potential moderators played a role in coaches’ implementation of the VF coaching sessions. The study underscores the importance of flexibility and adaptation in implementing the IC&L intervention. The variability in adherence and strategy use among coaches highlights the necessity of tailored approaches based on the specific needs and experiences of communication partners. Additionally, the intervention generally lasted longer than intended, primarily due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite challenges mostly related to the intervention's complexity, the IC&L intervention was overall well received and effectively implemented.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
先天性聋盲个体交流伙伴视频反馈指导的实施保真度
视频反馈(VF)指导被认为是干预措施的有效组成部分,旨在改善耳聋盲人与其交流伙伴之间的互动。然而,关于VF教练是如何实施的,以及这种实施在多大程度上符合设计的干预措施,缺乏研究。实施的保真度对于成功应用基于证据的实践至关重要,但需要一定的灵活性来根据个人情况调整干预措施。本研究探讨了新发展的影响沟通与语言(IC&;L)干预的实施过程。它侧重于实施保真度以及Carroll等人(2007)概念框架中描述的依从性和调节因素。4名教练和13名交流伙伴参与了这项研究。我们使用了多种数据来源来检验教练遵守IC&;L干预中设计的VF辅导课程的内容和剂量的程度,以及潜在的调节因子如何在教练实施VF辅导课程中发挥作用。该研究强调了实施ic&l干预措施时灵活性和适应性的重要性。教练员在依从性和策略使用方面的差异突出了根据交流伙伴的具体需求和经验量身定制方法的必要性。此外,干预措施的持续时间通常比预期的要长,这主要是由于COVID-19大流行。尽管面临的挑战主要与干预措施的复杂性有关,但IC&;L干预措施总体上受到了好评,并得到了有效的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
From control to facilitation: Analyzing instructional stance and distribution of classroom talk across elementary classrooms Challenges of accounting education in South African schools: A qualitative study of teachers’ competency in ICT integration and new teaching methodologies Exploring changes in grade 4 science attitudes and performance before and after the COVID-19 pandemic Students’ reading enjoyment as a multilevel mediator of the relationship between parental reading enjoyment, teachers’ stimulation of reading, ICT factors, and reading literacy Teachers’ use of humor to support students’ emotional regulation: A grounded theory approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1