Unmasking the hidden credential leaks in password managers and VPN clients

IF 5.4 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Computers & Security Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-28 DOI:10.1016/j.cose.2024.104298
Efstratios Chatzoglou , Vyron Kampourakis , Zisis Tsiatsikas , Georgios Karopoulos , Georgios Kambourakis
{"title":"Unmasking the hidden credential leaks in password managers and VPN clients","authors":"Efstratios Chatzoglou ,&nbsp;Vyron Kampourakis ,&nbsp;Zisis Tsiatsikas ,&nbsp;Georgios Karopoulos ,&nbsp;Georgios Kambourakis","doi":"10.1016/j.cose.2024.104298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the rapid growth of software services and applications, the need to secure digital assets became paramount. The introduction of Password Manager (PM) and Virtual Private Network (VPN) software was established as a prerequisite toolkit to bolster the end-user arsenal. As a matter of fact, these types of artifacts have been around for at least 25 years in various flavors, including desktop and browser-based applications. This work assesses the ability of 12 desktop PM applications, 5 browsers with integrated PM, and 12 PMs in the form of browser plugins, along with 21 VPN client applications, to effectively protect the confidentiality of secret credentials. Our analysis focuses on the period during which an app is loaded into RAM. Despite the sensitive nature of these applications, our results show that across all scenarios the majority of PM applications store plaintext passwords in the system memory; more specifically, 75% (or 9 out of 12) of desktop PM applications, 100% (5 out of 5) of browser PMs and 75% (or 9 out of 12) of PM browser plugins leak such sensitive information. In addition, 33% (or 7 out of 21) of VPN applications leak user credentials. This practice of storing cleartext sensitive information in system memory is widely recognized as a weakness, having also been registered as CWE-316. At the time of writing, merely four vendors have recognized our exploits as vulnerabilities. Three of these vendors have assigned the relevant Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) IDs, namely CVE-2023-23349, CVE-2024-9203, and CVE-2024-50570, whereas the fourth one will issue a CVE ID once it implements the relevant fixes. The remaining vendors have either chosen to disregard or downplay the severity of this issue.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51004,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Security","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 104298"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Security","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167404824006047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the rapid growth of software services and applications, the need to secure digital assets became paramount. The introduction of Password Manager (PM) and Virtual Private Network (VPN) software was established as a prerequisite toolkit to bolster the end-user arsenal. As a matter of fact, these types of artifacts have been around for at least 25 years in various flavors, including desktop and browser-based applications. This work assesses the ability of 12 desktop PM applications, 5 browsers with integrated PM, and 12 PMs in the form of browser plugins, along with 21 VPN client applications, to effectively protect the confidentiality of secret credentials. Our analysis focuses on the period during which an app is loaded into RAM. Despite the sensitive nature of these applications, our results show that across all scenarios the majority of PM applications store plaintext passwords in the system memory; more specifically, 75% (or 9 out of 12) of desktop PM applications, 100% (5 out of 5) of browser PMs and 75% (or 9 out of 12) of PM browser plugins leak such sensitive information. In addition, 33% (or 7 out of 21) of VPN applications leak user credentials. This practice of storing cleartext sensitive information in system memory is widely recognized as a weakness, having also been registered as CWE-316. At the time of writing, merely four vendors have recognized our exploits as vulnerabilities. Three of these vendors have assigned the relevant Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) IDs, namely CVE-2023-23349, CVE-2024-9203, and CVE-2024-50570, whereas the fourth one will issue a CVE ID once it implements the relevant fixes. The remaining vendors have either chosen to disregard or downplay the severity of this issue.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭开密码管理器和VPN客户端中隐藏的凭证泄漏
随着软件服务和应用程序的快速增长,保护数字资产的需求变得至关重要。密码管理器(PM)和虚拟专用网(VPN)软件的引入是增强最终用户武器库的先决条件。事实上,这些类型的工件已经以各种形式存在了至少25年,包括桌面和基于浏览器的应用程序。这项工作评估了12个桌面PM应用程序,5个集成PM的浏览器,12个浏览器插件形式的PM,以及21个VPN客户端应用程序的能力,以有效地保护秘密凭证的机密性。我们的分析侧重于应用程序加载到RAM的时间段。尽管这些应用程序具有敏感性,但我们的研究结果表明,在所有情况下,大多数PM应用程序在系统内存中存储明文密码;更具体地说,75%(或12个中的9个)的桌面PM应用程序,100%(5个中的5个)的浏览器PM和75%(或12个中的9个)的PM浏览器插件泄露此类敏感信息。此外,33%(或7 / 21)的VPN应用程序泄露用户凭据。这种在系统内存中存储明文敏感信息的做法被广泛认为是一个弱点,也被注册为CWE-316。在撰写本文时,只有四家供应商将我们的漏洞识别为漏洞。其中三家供应商已经分配了相关的常见漏洞和暴露(CVE) ID,即CVE-2023-23349, CVE-2024-9203和CVE-2024-50570,而第四个供应商将在实施相关修复后发布CVE ID。其余的供应商要么选择忽视这个问题的严重性,要么选择淡化这个问题的严重性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Security
Computers & Security 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
365
审稿时长
10.7 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Security is the most respected technical journal in the IT security field. With its high-profile editorial board and informative regular features and columns, the journal is essential reading for IT security professionals around the world. Computers & Security provides you with a unique blend of leading edge research and sound practical management advice. It is aimed at the professional involved with computer security, audit, control and data integrity in all sectors - industry, commerce and academia. Recognized worldwide as THE primary source of reference for applied research and technical expertise it is your first step to fully secure systems.
期刊最新文献
A provider-agnostic security framework for PKI-based electronic identity systems: A Swedish case study STAC-IoT: A secure task-based access control for IoT-edge computing architecture RanDS: A large-Scale open dataset of raw binaries and extracted features for ransomware research Unifying mixed boolean-arithmetic obfuscation by architectural and anti-generalization hardening Bridging industrial control systems design and testing through threat modeling-driven penetration testing - a microgrid case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1