Prevalence and Moderating Factors of Turnover Rate and Turnover Intention Among Nurses Worldwide: A Meta-Analysis

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Nursing Regulation Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1016/S2155-8256(25)00031-6
Dluha Mafula MSN, RN, Hidayat Arifin MSN, RN, Ruey Chen PhD, RN, Chien-Mei Sung PhD, RN, Chiu-Kuei Lee PhD, RN, Kai-Jo Chiang PhD, RN, Kondwani Joseph Banda PhD, RNM, Kuei-Ru Chou PhD, RN
{"title":"Prevalence and Moderating Factors of Turnover Rate and Turnover Intention Among Nurses Worldwide: A Meta-Analysis","authors":"Dluha Mafula MSN, RN,&nbsp;Hidayat Arifin MSN, RN,&nbsp;Ruey Chen PhD, RN,&nbsp;Chien-Mei Sung PhD, RN,&nbsp;Chiu-Kuei Lee PhD, RN,&nbsp;Kai-Jo Chiang PhD, RN,&nbsp;Kondwani Joseph Banda PhD, RNM,&nbsp;Kuei-Ru Chou PhD, RN","doi":"10.1016/S2155-8256(25)00031-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><strong>Background:</strong> High turnover and turnover intention rates among nurses exacerbate nursing shortages, reduce care quality, and negatively impact patient outcomes. Existing evidence on these effects needs to be updated to align with current trends, regulations, and policies to enhance organizational capacity and nurses’ well-being.</div><div><strong>Purpose:</strong> To estimate the turnover rate and prevalence of turnover intention among nurses worldwide and to evaluate moderating factors.</div><div><strong>Methods:</strong> A meta-analysis was conducted using six databases: CINAHL, Embase, ProQuest, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Studies published up to January 2024 were eligible for inclusion. Pooled prevalence was analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model and random effects model. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore variations, and heterogeneity was assessed using <em>I</em> 2 and Cochran’s Q statistics. Publication bias was assessed using Egger’s test.</div><div><strong>Results:</strong> Seventy-five studies involving 3,354,829 nurses were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled turnover rate was 15.2% (95% CI: 12.4%–18.4%), and the pooled prevalence of turnover intention was 38.4% (95% CI: 31.0%–46.4%). The turnover rate of night shift nurses (22.8%) was nearly double that of day shift nurses (14.7%). Night-shift nurses (61.7%) were three times more likely to consider leaving than day-shift nurses (18.7%). Full-time nurses had a higher turnover rate (76.7%) than part-time nurses (20.4%). Among medical-surgical nurses, 57.7% left, while 59.7% planned to leave.</div><div><strong>Conclusions:</strong> One in seven nurses leave their positions, and two in five intend to leave. Authorities should implement regulations, improve workplace conditions, and provide support systems and career opportunities to reduce turnover.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","volume":"15 4","pages":"Pages 20-36"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2155825625000316","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High turnover and turnover intention rates among nurses exacerbate nursing shortages, reduce care quality, and negatively impact patient outcomes. Existing evidence on these effects needs to be updated to align with current trends, regulations, and policies to enhance organizational capacity and nurses’ well-being.
Purpose: To estimate the turnover rate and prevalence of turnover intention among nurses worldwide and to evaluate moderating factors.
Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted using six databases: CINAHL, Embase, ProQuest, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Studies published up to January 2024 were eligible for inclusion. Pooled prevalence was analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model and random effects model. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore variations, and heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 and Cochran’s Q statistics. Publication bias was assessed using Egger’s test.
Results: Seventy-five studies involving 3,354,829 nurses were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled turnover rate was 15.2% (95% CI: 12.4%–18.4%), and the pooled prevalence of turnover intention was 38.4% (95% CI: 31.0%–46.4%). The turnover rate of night shift nurses (22.8%) was nearly double that of day shift nurses (14.7%). Night-shift nurses (61.7%) were three times more likely to consider leaving than day-shift nurses (18.7%). Full-time nurses had a higher turnover rate (76.7%) than part-time nurses (20.4%). Among medical-surgical nurses, 57.7% left, while 59.7% planned to leave.
Conclusions: One in seven nurses leave their positions, and two in five intend to leave. Authorities should implement regulations, improve workplace conditions, and provide support systems and career opportunities to reduce turnover.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球护士离职率及离职意向的流行及调节因素:一项荟萃分析
背景:护士的高离职率和离职意愿率加剧了护理短缺,降低了护理质量,并对患者预后产生负面影响。需要更新有关这些影响的现有证据,使其与当前的趋势、法规和政策保持一致,以提高组织能力和护士福祉。目的:评估全球护士离职率和离职意向的流行程度,并评估影响因素。方法:采用CINAHL、Embase、ProQuest、PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science 6个数据库进行meta分析。截至2024年1月发表的研究符合纳入条件。采用广义线性混合模型和随机效应模型对合并患病率进行分析。进行亚组分析以探索差异,并使用i2和Cochran 's Q统计来评估异质性。采用Egger’s检验评估发表偏倚。结果:本meta分析纳入75项研究,涉及3354829名护士。合并离职率为15.2% (95% CI: 12.4%-18.4%),合并离职意向患病率为38.4% (95% CI: 31.0%-46.4%)。夜班护士的离职率(22.8%)是白班护士(14.7%)的近两倍。夜班护士(61.7%)考虑离职的可能性是白班护士(18.7%)的三倍。全职护士的离职率(76.7%)高于兼职护士(20.4%)。在内科外科护士中,57.7%的人离职,59.7%的人计划离职。结论:七分之一的护士离职,五分之二的护士打算离职。当局应实施法规,改善工作条件,并提供支持系统和职业机会,以减少人员流失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
50
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Nursing Regulation (JNR), the official journal of the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN®), is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, academic and professional journal. It publishes scholarly articles that advance the science of nursing regulation, promote the mission and vision of NCSBN, and enhance communication and collaboration among nurse regulators, educators, practitioners, and the scientific community. The journal supports evidence-based regulation, addresses issues related to patient safety, and highlights current nursing regulatory issues, programs, and projects in both the United States and the international community. In publishing JNR, NCSBN''s goal is to develop and share knowledge related to nursing and other healthcare regulation across continents and to promote a greater awareness of regulatory issues among all nurses.
期刊最新文献
Reporting concerns to regulators: A novel analysis of feedback from people harmed by health and social care practitioners Vital signs: A trend analysis of the nursing faculty workforce Compassionate intervention for hospital nurses with suspected substance use: A case study Assessment of criminal records in nursing students: A guideline for educators What makes a professional degree? Nursing and the new student loan proposal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1