C. Berryman , G.L. Moseley , T.R. Stanton , B. Hordacre , F. Di Pietro
{"title":"Exploring interhemispheric interaction in complex regional pain syndrome","authors":"C. Berryman , G.L. Moseley , T.R. Stanton , B. Hordacre , F. Di Pietro","doi":"10.1016/j.neulet.2024.138100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is characterised by sensorimotor disturbances in the painful limb, coupled with neuroimaging evidence of functional changes in the primary somatosensory cortex (S1). However, the interaction between S1 in both hemispheres is unknown; altered interhemispheric interaction may contribute to this disorder.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We conducted the first study of sensory interhemispheric interaction in CRPS, specifically S1. This is also the first study to compare S1 interhemispheric inhibition in both directions in healthy controls.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Somatosensory evoked potentials were read with electroencephalography following paired median nerve stimulation at interstimulus intervals of 20, 25 and 30 ms.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was an inhibitory effect of the non-dominant on the dominant hemisphere in controls (ß = −0.308, SE 0.089, [CI −0.535, −0.081], t (914.9) = -3.49, p = 0.003), driven by changes in the N20/P25 SEP (i.e. S1). Importantly, this pattern of interhemispheric interaction was not seen in CRPS; in the CRPS group there was no evidence of interhemispheric inhibition – in either direction.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Given the difference in interhemispheric inhibition between CRPS and control groups, the role of S1 interhemispheric inhibition in CRPS needs further investigation. This may shed light on the sensorimotor disturbances characteristic of this disorder.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19290,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience Letters","volume":"847 ","pages":"Article 138100"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience Letters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304394024004798","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is characterised by sensorimotor disturbances in the painful limb, coupled with neuroimaging evidence of functional changes in the primary somatosensory cortex (S1). However, the interaction between S1 in both hemispheres is unknown; altered interhemispheric interaction may contribute to this disorder.
Objective
We conducted the first study of sensory interhemispheric interaction in CRPS, specifically S1. This is also the first study to compare S1 interhemispheric inhibition in both directions in healthy controls.
Methods
Somatosensory evoked potentials were read with electroencephalography following paired median nerve stimulation at interstimulus intervals of 20, 25 and 30 ms.
Results
There was an inhibitory effect of the non-dominant on the dominant hemisphere in controls (ß = −0.308, SE 0.089, [CI −0.535, −0.081], t (914.9) = -3.49, p = 0.003), driven by changes in the N20/P25 SEP (i.e. S1). Importantly, this pattern of interhemispheric interaction was not seen in CRPS; in the CRPS group there was no evidence of interhemispheric inhibition – in either direction.
Conclusion
Given the difference in interhemispheric inhibition between CRPS and control groups, the role of S1 interhemispheric inhibition in CRPS needs further investigation. This may shed light on the sensorimotor disturbances characteristic of this disorder.
期刊介绍:
Neuroscience Letters is devoted to the rapid publication of short, high-quality papers of interest to the broad community of neuroscientists. Only papers which will make a significant addition to the literature in the field will be published. Papers in all areas of neuroscience - molecular, cellular, developmental, systems, behavioral and cognitive, as well as computational - will be considered for publication. Submission of laboratory investigations that shed light on disease mechanisms is encouraged. Special Issues, edited by Guest Editors to cover new and rapidly-moving areas, will include invited mini-reviews. Occasional mini-reviews in especially timely areas will be considered for publication, without invitation, outside of Special Issues; these un-solicited mini-reviews can be submitted without invitation but must be of very high quality. Clinical studies will also be published if they provide new information about organization or actions of the nervous system, or provide new insights into the neurobiology of disease. NSL does not publish case reports.