Innovative combo product design embedding variable annuity and long-term care insurance contracts

IF 1.9 2区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Insurance Mathematics & Economics Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2025.01.004
Yang Shen, Michael Sherris, Yawei Wang, Jonathan Ziveyi
{"title":"Innovative combo product design embedding variable annuity and long-term care insurance contracts","authors":"Yang Shen,&nbsp;Michael Sherris,&nbsp;Yawei Wang,&nbsp;Jonathan Ziveyi","doi":"10.1016/j.insmatheco.2025.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents a novel combo insurance product design consisting of a variable annuity contract embedded with guaranteed minimum income benefit and long-term care insurance riders. This combo product provides enhanced benefits when the policyholder is functionally disabled. The policyholder and provider's joint optimal decision is formulated as a Nash equilibrium of a two-stage non-zero sum game. The provider aims to offer the optimal insurance product that minimises solvency capital requirement (SCR) per unit premium under Solvency II in the first stage. The policyholder aims to purchase the optimal amount of insurance that maximises lifetime utility in the second stage. The Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) simulation technique is utilised for numerically valuing the combo product whose underlying fund is proportionally invested in multiple asset classes. Due to the natural hedging effect between longevity and disability risks and the option payoff structure, the combo product is a win-win solution for providers and policyholders compared with an LTC annuity or an LTC insurance and a variable annuity with guaranteed minimum income benefit. From the policyholder's perspective, we quantify the extent to which the combo product costs less premium and the policyholder gains more lifetime utility. From the provider's perspective, we show that the combo product requires less SCR per initial unit premium. Product features including the elimination period and the maximum benefit period, are examined, and we show that they can effectively reduce the product premium. We perform fee sensitivity tests on model parameters to reveal insights regarding risk management from the provider's perspective.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54974,"journal":{"name":"Insurance Mathematics & Economics","volume":"121 ","pages":"Pages 79-99"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insurance Mathematics & Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668725000150","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a novel combo insurance product design consisting of a variable annuity contract embedded with guaranteed minimum income benefit and long-term care insurance riders. This combo product provides enhanced benefits when the policyholder is functionally disabled. The policyholder and provider's joint optimal decision is formulated as a Nash equilibrium of a two-stage non-zero sum game. The provider aims to offer the optimal insurance product that minimises solvency capital requirement (SCR) per unit premium under Solvency II in the first stage. The policyholder aims to purchase the optimal amount of insurance that maximises lifetime utility in the second stage. The Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) simulation technique is utilised for numerically valuing the combo product whose underlying fund is proportionally invested in multiple asset classes. Due to the natural hedging effect between longevity and disability risks and the option payoff structure, the combo product is a win-win solution for providers and policyholders compared with an LTC annuity or an LTC insurance and a variable annuity with guaranteed minimum income benefit. From the policyholder's perspective, we quantify the extent to which the combo product costs less premium and the policyholder gains more lifetime utility. From the provider's perspective, we show that the combo product requires less SCR per initial unit premium. Product features including the elimination period and the maximum benefit period, are examined, and we show that they can effectively reduce the product premium. We perform fee sensitivity tests on model parameters to reveal insights regarding risk management from the provider's perspective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Insurance Mathematics & Economics
Insurance Mathematics & Economics 管理科学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
15.80%
发文量
90
审稿时长
17.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Insurance: Mathematics and Economics publishes leading research spanning all fields of actuarial science research. It appears six times per year and is the largest journal in actuarial science research around the world. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics is an international academic journal that aims to strengthen the communication between individuals and groups who develop and apply research results in actuarial science. The journal feels a particular obligation to facilitate closer cooperation between those who conduct research in insurance mathematics and quantitative insurance economics, and practicing actuaries who are interested in the implementation of the results. To this purpose, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics publishes high-quality articles of broad international interest, concerned with either the theory of insurance mathematics and quantitative insurance economics or the inventive application of it, including empirical or experimental results. Articles that combine several of these aspects are particularly considered.
期刊最新文献
Insurance contract for electric vehicle charging stations: A Stackelberg game-theoretic approach Editorial Board Auto insurance fraud detection: Leveraging cost sensitive and insensitive algorithms for comprehensive analysis Identifying scenarios for the own risk and Solvency assessment of insurance companies Subjective survival beliefs and the life-cycle model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1