Can strict environmental regulation reduce firm cost stickiness? Evidence from the new environmental protection law in China

IF 14.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Economics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108218
Yan Chen , Kerui Du , Ruiqi Sun , Tiantian Wang
{"title":"Can strict environmental regulation reduce firm cost stickiness? Evidence from the new environmental protection law in China","authors":"Yan Chen ,&nbsp;Kerui Du ,&nbsp;Ruiqi Sun ,&nbsp;Tiantian Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The existing literature presents considerable controversy regarding the impact of environmental regulations on enterprise competition. This paper adds to the literature with new evidence from the perspective of cost stickiness. External environmental regulations can create operational pressures for enterprises, leading to changes in cost adjustment. We utilize a difference-in-differences method to examine the impact of environmental regulations on firm cost stickiness, focusing specifically on the quasi-natural experiment of implementing China's new environmental protection law in 2015. Findings indicate that the implementation of this law exerts a substantial effect on reducing firm cost stickiness. Mechanism tests reveal that this reduction is primarily achieved through lowering adjustment costs, managing executive expectations, and addressing agency problems. Heterogeneity analysis shows these effects are pronounced in enterprises with strict financial constraints and CEO non-duality. By expanding upon existing literature concerning factors influencing cost stickiness and providing valuable empirical evidence supporting strengthened environmental regulation, this paper contributes to enhancing our understanding of the economic consequence of environmental governance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"142 ","pages":"Article 108218"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325000416","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The existing literature presents considerable controversy regarding the impact of environmental regulations on enterprise competition. This paper adds to the literature with new evidence from the perspective of cost stickiness. External environmental regulations can create operational pressures for enterprises, leading to changes in cost adjustment. We utilize a difference-in-differences method to examine the impact of environmental regulations on firm cost stickiness, focusing specifically on the quasi-natural experiment of implementing China's new environmental protection law in 2015. Findings indicate that the implementation of this law exerts a substantial effect on reducing firm cost stickiness. Mechanism tests reveal that this reduction is primarily achieved through lowering adjustment costs, managing executive expectations, and addressing agency problems. Heterogeneity analysis shows these effects are pronounced in enterprises with strict financial constraints and CEO non-duality. By expanding upon existing literature concerning factors influencing cost stickiness and providing valuable empirical evidence supporting strengthened environmental regulation, this paper contributes to enhancing our understanding of the economic consequence of environmental governance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
严格的环境监管能降低企业成本粘性吗?来自中国新环保法的证据
现有文献对环境规制对企业竞争的影响存在相当大的争议。本文从成本粘性的角度为文献提供了新的证据。外部环境法规会给企业带来经营压力,导致成本调整的变化。我们利用差异中的差异方法考察了环境法规对企业成本粘性的影响,特别关注了2015年中国新环保法实施的准自然实验。研究结果表明,该法律的实施对降低企业成本粘性有实质性的作用。机制测试表明,这种减少主要是通过降低调整成本、管理高管期望和解决代理问题来实现的。异质性分析表明,这些效应在财务约束严格且CEO非二元的企业中表现明显。本文通过对现有文献中成本粘性影响因素的扩充,为加强环境规制提供了有价值的经验证据,有助于加深我们对环境治理经济后果的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
期刊最新文献
Power hungry: How AI will drive energy demand Gone with the wind: Renewable energy projects and population change Street green space and electricity demand: Evidence from metered consumption data Corrigendum to “Is flexible plug-in electric vehicle charging an attractive investment? Evidence from implicit discount rate estimation” [Energy Economics 154 (2026) 109134]. The price of going green: Multi-objective optimization in the energy equity space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1