{"title":"Can strict environmental regulation reduce firm cost stickiness? Evidence from the new environmental protection law in China","authors":"Yan Chen , Kerui Du , Ruiqi Sun , Tiantian Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The existing literature presents considerable controversy regarding the impact of environmental regulations on enterprise competition. This paper adds to the literature with new evidence from the perspective of cost stickiness. External environmental regulations can create operational pressures for enterprises, leading to changes in cost adjustment. We utilize a difference-in-differences method to examine the impact of environmental regulations on firm cost stickiness, focusing specifically on the quasi-natural experiment of implementing China's new environmental protection law in 2015. Findings indicate that the implementation of this law exerts a substantial effect on reducing firm cost stickiness. Mechanism tests reveal that this reduction is primarily achieved through lowering adjustment costs, managing executive expectations, and addressing agency problems. Heterogeneity analysis shows these effects are pronounced in enterprises with strict financial constraints and CEO non-duality. By expanding upon existing literature concerning factors influencing cost stickiness and providing valuable empirical evidence supporting strengthened environmental regulation, this paper contributes to enhancing our understanding of the economic consequence of environmental governance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"142 ","pages":"Article 108218"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325000416","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The existing literature presents considerable controversy regarding the impact of environmental regulations on enterprise competition. This paper adds to the literature with new evidence from the perspective of cost stickiness. External environmental regulations can create operational pressures for enterprises, leading to changes in cost adjustment. We utilize a difference-in-differences method to examine the impact of environmental regulations on firm cost stickiness, focusing specifically on the quasi-natural experiment of implementing China's new environmental protection law in 2015. Findings indicate that the implementation of this law exerts a substantial effect on reducing firm cost stickiness. Mechanism tests reveal that this reduction is primarily achieved through lowering adjustment costs, managing executive expectations, and addressing agency problems. Heterogeneity analysis shows these effects are pronounced in enterprises with strict financial constraints and CEO non-duality. By expanding upon existing literature concerning factors influencing cost stickiness and providing valuable empirical evidence supporting strengthened environmental regulation, this paper contributes to enhancing our understanding of the economic consequence of environmental governance.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.