The contribution of the visual modality to vowel perception in native and non-native speakers

IF 2.4 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Journal of Phonetics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1016/j.wocn.2024.101375
Sinéad M. Rankin, Maria-Josep Solé
{"title":"The contribution of the visual modality to vowel perception in native and non-native speakers","authors":"Sinéad M. Rankin,&nbsp;Maria-Josep Solé","doi":"10.1016/j.wocn.2024.101375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines how visual cues impact the intelligibility of foreign-accented speech for native listeners. English CVC words with vowels involving salient (e.g., lip-spreading for /iː/) and non-salient visual cues (neutral lips for /ɪ/) produced by two French speakers and a native English control, were presented to native English listeners who identified the word heard. Tokens were presented in both auditory-only and audiovisual (AV) mode in cafeteria noise at −15 dB SNR. The visual cues analysed were lip spreading, lip rounding, jaw opening and tongue frontness in vowels, as well as lip-rounding in schwa. Visually salient cues improved vowel intelligibility, compared to non-visual cues, but the audiovisual benefit varied across vowel features and speaker groups. The presence of lip-spreading for /iː/ (vs /ɪ/) and jaw-opening for /æ/ (vs /ɪ/) enhanced intelligibility (i.e., larger AV benefit) for both speaker groups. However, compared to the English speaker, lip-rounding in /ɔː/ and /ə/ produced by French speakers<!--> <!-->(likely accompanied by lip protrusion) had a smaller, or negative AV benefit. These results suggest that the influence of L1 gestures on L2 production may reduce or negatively affect intelligibility. Furthermore, French productions of /ɑː/ exhibited unusually high AV benefits, suggesting an extreme jaw-opening for this vowel in an attempt to distinguish between L2 contrasts (/æ ʌ ɑː/) not present in the L1.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Phonetics","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 101375"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Phonetics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095447024000810","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines how visual cues impact the intelligibility of foreign-accented speech for native listeners. English CVC words with vowels involving salient (e.g., lip-spreading for /iː/) and non-salient visual cues (neutral lips for /ɪ/) produced by two French speakers and a native English control, were presented to native English listeners who identified the word heard. Tokens were presented in both auditory-only and audiovisual (AV) mode in cafeteria noise at −15 dB SNR. The visual cues analysed were lip spreading, lip rounding, jaw opening and tongue frontness in vowels, as well as lip-rounding in schwa. Visually salient cues improved vowel intelligibility, compared to non-visual cues, but the audiovisual benefit varied across vowel features and speaker groups. The presence of lip-spreading for /iː/ (vs /ɪ/) and jaw-opening for /æ/ (vs /ɪ/) enhanced intelligibility (i.e., larger AV benefit) for both speaker groups. However, compared to the English speaker, lip-rounding in /ɔː/ and /ə/ produced by French speakers (likely accompanied by lip protrusion) had a smaller, or negative AV benefit. These results suggest that the influence of L1 gestures on L2 production may reduce or negatively affect intelligibility. Furthermore, French productions of /ɑː/ exhibited unusually high AV benefits, suggesting an extreme jaw-opening for this vowel in an attempt to distinguish between L2 contrasts (/æ ʌ ɑː/) not present in the L1.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视觉形态对母语和非母语者元音感知的贡献
本研究探讨视觉线索如何影响母语听众对外国口音演讲的可理解性。研究人员将两名法语使用者和一名英语母语对照者所产生的带有明显元音(例如,发/i / /时嘴唇张开)和非明显视觉线索(发/ / /时嘴唇中性)的英语CVC单词呈现给母语为英语的听众,让他们识别所听到的单词。在- 15 dB信噪比的自助餐厅噪声中,标记以纯听觉和视听(AV)模式呈现。分析的视觉线索包括元音中的嘴唇张开、嘴唇圆润、下巴张开和舌头正面,以及弱读音中的嘴唇圆润。与非视觉线索相比,视觉上显著的线索提高了元音的可理解性,但在不同的元音特征和说话者群体中,视听上的好处有所不同。对于两个说话群体来说,发/i / / (vs / / /)时嘴唇张开,发/æ/ (vs / / /)时下巴张开,提高了可理解性(即更大的AV优势)。然而,与说英语的人相比,说法语的人在发/[/]和/[/]音时发圆唇(可能伴随着嘴唇突出)对AV的好处更小,甚至是负面的。这些结果表明,母语手势对第二语言产生的影响可能会降低或负面影响可理解性。此外,法语中的/ j /音表现出了不同寻常的高音高优势,这表明这个元音在区分L2对比音(/ j / /)时,需要极大地张开下巴,而L2对比音(/ j / /)在L1中并不存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
26.30%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The Journal of Phonetics publishes papers of an experimental or theoretical nature that deal with phonetic aspects of language and linguistic communication processes. Papers dealing with technological and/or pathological topics, or papers of an interdisciplinary nature are also suitable, provided that linguistic-phonetic principles underlie the work reported. Regular articles, review articles, and letters to the editor are published. Themed issues are also published, devoted entirely to a specific subject of interest within the field of phonetics.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The effect of contrast-specific minimal pair competitor in hyperarticulation of VOT and F0 phonetic cues in Korean initial stops in tonogenetic sound change Does pronunciation distance predict accent categorization? Evidence for the respective contributions of segment distance and suprasegmentals Quantitative evidence of complex metrical prosody in Chugach Alutiiq Speaking rate effects on Japanese vowel and consonant length contrasts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1