{"title":"Optimizing site investigations for gassy soils: A Bi-objective approach using value of information and cost of boreholes","authors":"Shao-Lin Ding , Kai-Qi Li , Rui Tao","doi":"10.1016/j.probengmech.2024.103727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Gassy soils, containing flammable gases like methane (CH₄), are commonly found in the shallow layers of Quaternary deposits, posing significant challenges for underground construction. Effective site investigation, particularly the strategic placement of boreholes for gas pressure measurement, is critical for assessing engineering risks. However, the high costs of borehole drilling often limit the amount of available gas pressure data, leading to potential errors in risk assessments at unmeasured locations. Misclassifying hazardous conditions as safe can result in costly penalties. Currently, investigation strategies that balance cost reduction with risk mitigation rely largely on engineering judgment. This study presents a probabilistic optimization approach for planning site investigations in gassy soils, explicitly addressing the trade-off between investigation costs and misclassification penalties. These factors are quantified using Value of Information (VoI) and cost of boreholes (CoB). The optimal investigation strategy is determined through the knee point method, which identifies the best compromise between VoI and CoB. A case study on Hangzhou Metro Line 1 demonstrates the practicality and effectiveness of this approach, showing that the optimal strategy balances VoI maximization with CoB minimization. The knee point method effectively identifies this compromise, ensuring maximum marginal utility by balancing information value and investigation cost.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54583,"journal":{"name":"Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 103727"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266892024001498","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Gassy soils, containing flammable gases like methane (CH₄), are commonly found in the shallow layers of Quaternary deposits, posing significant challenges for underground construction. Effective site investigation, particularly the strategic placement of boreholes for gas pressure measurement, is critical for assessing engineering risks. However, the high costs of borehole drilling often limit the amount of available gas pressure data, leading to potential errors in risk assessments at unmeasured locations. Misclassifying hazardous conditions as safe can result in costly penalties. Currently, investigation strategies that balance cost reduction with risk mitigation rely largely on engineering judgment. This study presents a probabilistic optimization approach for planning site investigations in gassy soils, explicitly addressing the trade-off between investigation costs and misclassification penalties. These factors are quantified using Value of Information (VoI) and cost of boreholes (CoB). The optimal investigation strategy is determined through the knee point method, which identifies the best compromise between VoI and CoB. A case study on Hangzhou Metro Line 1 demonstrates the practicality and effectiveness of this approach, showing that the optimal strategy balances VoI maximization with CoB minimization. The knee point method effectively identifies this compromise, ensuring maximum marginal utility by balancing information value and investigation cost.
期刊介绍:
This journal provides a forum for scholarly work dealing primarily with probabilistic and statistical approaches to contemporary solid/structural and fluid mechanics problems encountered in diverse technical disciplines such as aerospace, civil, marine, mechanical, and nuclear engineering. The journal aims to maintain a healthy balance between general solution techniques and problem-specific results, encouraging a fruitful exchange of ideas among disparate engineering specialities.