Accuracy evaluation of global tidal models in the Bohai Sea via the combination of tide gauges and GFO satellite altimeters

IF 3.1 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Ocean Modelling Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.ocemod.2025.102499
Haidong Pan , Dingqi Wang , Fei Teng , Xiaoqing Xu , Tengfei Xu , Zexun Wei
{"title":"Accuracy evaluation of global tidal models in the Bohai Sea via the combination of tide gauges and GFO satellite altimeters","authors":"Haidong Pan ,&nbsp;Dingqi Wang ,&nbsp;Fei Teng ,&nbsp;Xiaoqing Xu ,&nbsp;Tengfei Xu ,&nbsp;Zexun Wei","doi":"10.1016/j.ocemod.2025.102499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accuracy assessments of global tide models are essential for practical applications such as navigation and tidal correction in satellite altimetry. Traditionally, model accuracy assessment is performed by comparing global tide models with point-based tide gauges which are spatially limited in terms of number and location. To address the issue of the scarcity of tide gauges in the sea areas of interest, previous studies have introduced tide-favourable Topex/Poseidon (T/P)-Jason series as supplements in the course of model evaluation. However, the overlap of T/P-Jason series in model construction and evaluation may destroy the reliability of their evaluation results. In this study, we evaluate the accuracy of five popular global tide models (EOT20, FES2014, TPXO9, HAMTIDE12, and DTU16) in the Bohai Sea via the combination of four tide gauges and ∼8-year Geosat Follow-On (GFO) satellite altimeter records. The wide coverage of GFO data and their independence from analyzed global tide models guarantee the reliability of our findings. The results from GFO data and tide gauges are highly consistent, both revealing the superiority of FES2014 and the poor performances of TPXO9 and HAMTIDE12 in the Bohai Sea. The performances of FES-referenced models (EOT20 and DTU16) are generally good but slightly worse than that of FES2014. Of note, tidal amplitudes of eight major constituents derived from TPXO9 are abnormally small in the Bohai Sea. As water depths decrease, the errors of all five global tide models elevate notably, indicting the challenges in modelling coastal tides which may necessitate further exploration and improvements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19457,"journal":{"name":"Ocean Modelling","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 102499"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1463500325000034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accuracy assessments of global tide models are essential for practical applications such as navigation and tidal correction in satellite altimetry. Traditionally, model accuracy assessment is performed by comparing global tide models with point-based tide gauges which are spatially limited in terms of number and location. To address the issue of the scarcity of tide gauges in the sea areas of interest, previous studies have introduced tide-favourable Topex/Poseidon (T/P)-Jason series as supplements in the course of model evaluation. However, the overlap of T/P-Jason series in model construction and evaluation may destroy the reliability of their evaluation results. In this study, we evaluate the accuracy of five popular global tide models (EOT20, FES2014, TPXO9, HAMTIDE12, and DTU16) in the Bohai Sea via the combination of four tide gauges and ∼8-year Geosat Follow-On (GFO) satellite altimeter records. The wide coverage of GFO data and their independence from analyzed global tide models guarantee the reliability of our findings. The results from GFO data and tide gauges are highly consistent, both revealing the superiority of FES2014 and the poor performances of TPXO9 and HAMTIDE12 in the Bohai Sea. The performances of FES-referenced models (EOT20 and DTU16) are generally good but slightly worse than that of FES2014. Of note, tidal amplitudes of eight major constituents derived from TPXO9 are abnormally small in the Bohai Sea. As water depths decrease, the errors of all five global tide models elevate notably, indicting the challenges in modelling coastal tides which may necessitate further exploration and improvements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ocean Modelling
Ocean Modelling 地学-海洋学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
86
审稿时长
19.6 weeks
期刊介绍: The main objective of Ocean Modelling is to provide rapid communication between those interested in ocean modelling, whether through direct observation, or through analytical, numerical or laboratory models, and including interactions between physical and biogeochemical or biological phenomena. Because of the intimate links between ocean and atmosphere, involvement of scientists interested in influences of either medium on the other is welcome. The journal has a wide scope and includes ocean-atmosphere interaction in various forms as well as pure ocean results. In addition to primary peer-reviewed papers, the journal provides review papers, preliminary communications, and discussions.
期刊最新文献
The Bayesian backtracking problem in oceanic drift modelling Accuracy evaluation of global tidal models in the Bohai Sea via the combination of tide gauges and GFO satellite altimeters Editorial Board Mechanism and application of the Lagrangian flow network method to indicate practical material distribution patterns in the tide-dominated Bohai Sea with multi-frequency tides Enhancing downscaled ocean wave conditions with machine learning and wave spectra
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1