The environmental impact of green trade and circular trade: Does urbanization matter?

Cleaner Production Letters Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-15 DOI:10.1016/j.clpl.2024.100086
Dorothea M. Ramizo, Helen Cabalu, Mark Harris, Julian Inchauspe
{"title":"The environmental impact of green trade and circular trade: Does urbanization matter?","authors":"Dorothea M. Ramizo,&nbsp;Helen Cabalu,&nbsp;Mark Harris,&nbsp;Julian Inchauspe","doi":"10.1016/j.clpl.2024.100086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban areas are responsible for approximately two-thirds of global energy consumption and over 70% of greenhouse gas emissions, making them pivotal in addressing the global climate crisis. International efforts to achieve decarbonization have emphasized the role of trade in circular economy goods (or circular trade) and green trade composed of environmental goods and low-carbon technologies. Despite their significance, there is limited empirical evidence on how such trade impacts environmental outcomes, particularly when considering urbanization. This study addresses this research gap. Drawing on data from 54 economies between 2000 and 2018, the research employs a panel model incorporating theoretical transmission mechanisms and non-linear threshold effects. The findings reveal that while circular trade reduces environmental degradation, green trade initially exacerbates it. However, interaction models show that urbanization mitigates these negative impacts, enabling green trade to deliver better environmental outcomes. Panel threshold analysis supports these findings. These results challenge the prevailing narrative that green trade mitigates environmental degradation, shedding light on the complex dynamics between trade, urbanization, and environmental sustainability. This study highlights the need for tailored policies that consider a country’s urbanization level to maximize the environmental gains of green and circular trade.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100255,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Production Letters","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100086"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Production Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791624000320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban areas are responsible for approximately two-thirds of global energy consumption and over 70% of greenhouse gas emissions, making them pivotal in addressing the global climate crisis. International efforts to achieve decarbonization have emphasized the role of trade in circular economy goods (or circular trade) and green trade composed of environmental goods and low-carbon technologies. Despite their significance, there is limited empirical evidence on how such trade impacts environmental outcomes, particularly when considering urbanization. This study addresses this research gap. Drawing on data from 54 economies between 2000 and 2018, the research employs a panel model incorporating theoretical transmission mechanisms and non-linear threshold effects. The findings reveal that while circular trade reduces environmental degradation, green trade initially exacerbates it. However, interaction models show that urbanization mitigates these negative impacts, enabling green trade to deliver better environmental outcomes. Panel threshold analysis supports these findings. These results challenge the prevailing narrative that green trade mitigates environmental degradation, shedding light on the complex dynamics between trade, urbanization, and environmental sustainability. This study highlights the need for tailored policies that consider a country’s urbanization level to maximize the environmental gains of green and circular trade.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绿色贸易和循环贸易的环境影响:城市化重要吗?
城市地区约占全球能源消耗的三分之二,温室气体排放的70%以上,是应对全球气候危机的关键。国际上实现脱碳的努力强调了循环经济产品(或循环贸易)贸易和由环境产品和低碳技术组成的绿色贸易的作用。尽管它们意义重大,但关于此类贸易如何影响环境结果的经验证据有限,特别是在考虑到城市化的情况下。本研究解决了这一研究空白。该研究利用2000年至2018年54个经济体的数据,采用了一个综合了理论传导机制和非线性阈值效应的面板模型。研究结果表明,虽然循环贸易减少了环境恶化,但绿色贸易最初加剧了环境恶化。然而,相互作用模型表明,城市化减轻了这些负面影响,使绿色贸易能够带来更好的环境结果。面板阈值分析支持这些发现。这些结果挑战了绿色贸易减轻环境退化的主流说法,揭示了贸易、城市化和环境可持续性之间复杂的动态关系。本研究强调,需要制定考虑到一国城市化水平的量身定制政策,以最大限度地提高绿色和循环贸易的环境效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Circular supply chain partnership performance indicators in the paint and coating industry using a sustainable balanced scorecard framework Identifying materials in tidal energy technology and their effects to human health, ecosystems, and resources: A life cycle assessment perspective The state of circular economy implementation in the building and construction sector in Aotearoa New Zealand Assessing the impacts of computer reuse for digital inclusion from product information Forging sustainable futures: A mixed-methods analysis of customer loyalty in Thailand's home-building industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1