Machine Learning Approaches for Early Warning of Tsunami Induced by Volcano Flank Collapse and Implication for Future Risk Management: Case of Anak Krakatau

IF 3.1 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Ocean Modelling Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1016/j.ocemod.2025.102497
E. Juanara, C.Y. Lam
{"title":"Machine Learning Approaches for Early Warning of Tsunami Induced by Volcano Flank Collapse and Implication for Future Risk Management: Case of Anak Krakatau","authors":"E. Juanara,&nbsp;C.Y. Lam","doi":"10.1016/j.ocemod.2025.102497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A tsunami triggered by volcanic collapse is a low-probability but high-impact event. Unlike tsunamis triggered by earthquakes which the mechanism is well understood, volcanic tsunami events have complex trigger mechanisms and occur with little to no warning such as the event in December 2018 of the Anak Krakatau volcano tsunami, making it more difficult to detect and issue a warning. We adopted collapse tsunami machine learning (ML) approach model which does not require source information, to predict maximum tsunami amplitude on four coastal stations. Observations from six synthetic observation stations around Anak Krakatau volcano were used as input for collapse tsunami ML. The 320 collapse scenarios triggering tsunamis with various parameters and directions were generated to train model. To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the tsunami simulations, we conducted a comparison between the simulated waveforms and those recorded at four coastal stations during the December 2018 event. The RMSE values between predicted and actual (via forward tsunami) of Random Forest model consistently provide the most accurate predictions ranging from 0.0586 to 0.1945 across three out of the four stations. We also applied deep learning algorithms, LSTM, and Complex LSTM to predict tsunami full waveform by using short-duration observation as input. Furthermore, we also pointed out the potential of risk management that can be explored and integrated from results of the maximum tsunami amplitude and arrival time predictions for support decision-making. We suggest that the ML approach could be a good alternative for volcanic tsunamis early warning purposes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19457,"journal":{"name":"Ocean Modelling","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 102497"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1463500325000010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A tsunami triggered by volcanic collapse is a low-probability but high-impact event. Unlike tsunamis triggered by earthquakes which the mechanism is well understood, volcanic tsunami events have complex trigger mechanisms and occur with little to no warning such as the event in December 2018 of the Anak Krakatau volcano tsunami, making it more difficult to detect and issue a warning. We adopted collapse tsunami machine learning (ML) approach model which does not require source information, to predict maximum tsunami amplitude on four coastal stations. Observations from six synthetic observation stations around Anak Krakatau volcano were used as input for collapse tsunami ML. The 320 collapse scenarios triggering tsunamis with various parameters and directions were generated to train model. To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the tsunami simulations, we conducted a comparison between the simulated waveforms and those recorded at four coastal stations during the December 2018 event. The RMSE values between predicted and actual (via forward tsunami) of Random Forest model consistently provide the most accurate predictions ranging from 0.0586 to 0.1945 across three out of the four stations. We also applied deep learning algorithms, LSTM, and Complex LSTM to predict tsunami full waveform by using short-duration observation as input. Furthermore, we also pointed out the potential of risk management that can be explored and integrated from results of the maximum tsunami amplitude and arrival time predictions for support decision-making. We suggest that the ML approach could be a good alternative for volcanic tsunamis early warning purposes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ocean Modelling
Ocean Modelling 地学-海洋学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
86
审稿时长
19.6 weeks
期刊介绍: The main objective of Ocean Modelling is to provide rapid communication between those interested in ocean modelling, whether through direct observation, or through analytical, numerical or laboratory models, and including interactions between physical and biogeochemical or biological phenomena. Because of the intimate links between ocean and atmosphere, involvement of scientists interested in influences of either medium on the other is welcome. The journal has a wide scope and includes ocean-atmosphere interaction in various forms as well as pure ocean results. In addition to primary peer-reviewed papers, the journal provides review papers, preliminary communications, and discussions.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board A nonhydrostatic formulation for MPAS-Ocean Implementation of Accurate, Interactive Sea Ice Radiative Transfer into the GISS GCM and Its Impact on the Solar Radiation Distribution in the Arctic Atmosphere-Sea Ice-Ocean System High-frequency wave dynamics in mixed seas: The influence of swells on wind waves characteristics Dynamic effects of different turbulence closure schemes on Lagrangian residual velocity in an elongated bay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1