Macroeconomic responses to financial stress shocks: Evidence from the US and the Eurozone

International Economics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1016/j.inteco.2024.100573
Nikolaos Giannellis, Maria-Anna Tzanaki
{"title":"Macroeconomic responses to financial stress shocks: Evidence from the US and the Eurozone","authors":"Nikolaos Giannellis,&nbsp;Maria-Anna Tzanaki","doi":"10.1016/j.inteco.2024.100573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates the macroeconomic effects of an unexpected financial stress shock in the United States and the Eurozone, focusing mainly on the effect on unemployment and the response of monetary policy. First, we estimate Impulse Response Functions (IRFs) based on a Structural Vector Autoregression (SVAR) model with short-run restrictions according to economic theory. Next, we perform panel data analysis shedding light on the factors that affect unemployment in the two regions. Our findings indicate a significant impact of financial stress shocks on the macroeconomic environment, but with different policy responses from the Federal Reserve (Fed) and the European Central Bank (ECB). The impact of higher financial stress on economic activity and employment is negative in both regions, but the duration of the impact on unemployment is shorter in the US, suggesting a quicker recovery in the US labor market compared to the Eurozone. The faster recovery of the US labor market is primarily due to the superior institutional and regulatory performance in the US. These findings provide policymakers with valuable lessons about the importance of continuous monitoring and quick action to mitigate the negative effects of financial instability on economic activity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13794,"journal":{"name":"International Economics","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 100573"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2110701724000969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the macroeconomic effects of an unexpected financial stress shock in the United States and the Eurozone, focusing mainly on the effect on unemployment and the response of monetary policy. First, we estimate Impulse Response Functions (IRFs) based on a Structural Vector Autoregression (SVAR) model with short-run restrictions according to economic theory. Next, we perform panel data analysis shedding light on the factors that affect unemployment in the two regions. Our findings indicate a significant impact of financial stress shocks on the macroeconomic environment, but with different policy responses from the Federal Reserve (Fed) and the European Central Bank (ECB). The impact of higher financial stress on economic activity and employment is negative in both regions, but the duration of the impact on unemployment is shorter in the US, suggesting a quicker recovery in the US labor market compared to the Eurozone. The faster recovery of the US labor market is primarily due to the superior institutional and regulatory performance in the US. These findings provide policymakers with valuable lessons about the importance of continuous monitoring and quick action to mitigate the negative effects of financial instability on economic activity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宏观经济对金融压力冲击的反应:来自美国和欧元区的证据
本文研究了意外金融压力冲击对美国和欧元区的宏观经济影响,主要关注对失业的影响和货币政策的反应。首先,根据经济理论,基于短期约束的结构向量自回归(SVAR)模型估计脉冲响应函数(irf)。接下来,我们进行面板数据分析,揭示影响两个地区失业的因素。我们的研究结果表明,金融压力冲击对宏观经济环境产生了重大影响,但美联储(Fed)和欧洲央行(ECB)的政策反应不同。在这两个地区,较高的金融压力对经济活动和就业的影响都是负面的,但对美国失业的影响持续时间较短,这表明美国劳动力市场的复苏速度比欧元区更快。美国劳动力市场的快速复苏主要得益于美国优越的制度和监管表现。这些发现为政策制定者提供了宝贵的经验,说明持续监测和迅速采取行动减轻金融不稳定对经济活动的负面影响的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Economics
International Economics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
71 days
期刊最新文献
Exchange rate responses to the 2025 U.S. Liberation Day tariff announcement Monetary policy uncertainty in Mexico: An unsupervised approach Double-edged sword of capital mobility: Risk-sharing gains vs. volatility spillovers—Evidence from a multi-country panel Does economic complexity foster financial development around the world? Resource and energy transition with digital governance for global decarbonomics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1