Is policy pilot a viable path to sustainable development? Attention allocation perspective

IF 9.8 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Review of Financial Analysis Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1016/j.irfa.2025.103923
Jiapeng Dai
{"title":"Is policy pilot a viable path to sustainable development? Attention allocation perspective","authors":"Jiapeng Dai","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2025.103923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Policy pilot programs are gaining attention as innovative governance to encourage sustainable development. However, their effectiveness and influencing factors are debated, while the impact of these pilots under varying concentrations of societal attention is underexplored. This study examined whether policy pilots can aid in sustainable development by investigatingChina's carbon emissions trade pilot policy (COTPP), a market-driven environmental regulation. Using a difference-in-differences methodology, we analyzed 13,559 firm–year observations spanning 2011–2021 to assess the policy's impact on corporate carbon emissions. The empirical findings indicate that COTPP implementation significantly reduced corporate carbon emissions. There were heterogeneous effects spanning organizational and regional contexts. The emission reduction effect was more distinct for state-owned enterprises (SOEs) than non-SOEs and firms located in the economically developed eastern region relative to those in the central and western regions. Moreover, attention allocation—established through governmental, public, and media engagement—was a critical moderating factor.The moderating effect is strongest for government attention, followed by public attention, with media attention showing the weakest yet still significant effect. Integrating organizational heterogeneity and an attention allocation framework advanced the theoretical understanding of policy pilot effectiveness, providing practical insights for designing market-based environmental regulations. These findings augment environmental governance research and policy implementation practice by elucidating how contextual factors and informal institutional engagement can be leveraged to strengthen sustainable development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48226,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Financial Analysis","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 103923"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Financial Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925000109","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Policy pilot programs are gaining attention as innovative governance to encourage sustainable development. However, their effectiveness and influencing factors are debated, while the impact of these pilots under varying concentrations of societal attention is underexplored. This study examined whether policy pilots can aid in sustainable development by investigatingChina's carbon emissions trade pilot policy (COTPP), a market-driven environmental regulation. Using a difference-in-differences methodology, we analyzed 13,559 firm–year observations spanning 2011–2021 to assess the policy's impact on corporate carbon emissions. The empirical findings indicate that COTPP implementation significantly reduced corporate carbon emissions. There were heterogeneous effects spanning organizational and regional contexts. The emission reduction effect was more distinct for state-owned enterprises (SOEs) than non-SOEs and firms located in the economically developed eastern region relative to those in the central and western regions. Moreover, attention allocation—established through governmental, public, and media engagement—was a critical moderating factor.The moderating effect is strongest for government attention, followed by public attention, with media attention showing the weakest yet still significant effect. Integrating organizational heterogeneity and an attention allocation framework advanced the theoretical understanding of policy pilot effectiveness, providing practical insights for designing market-based environmental regulations. These findings augment environmental governance research and policy implementation practice by elucidating how contextual factors and informal institutional engagement can be leveraged to strengthen sustainable development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政策试点是可持续发展的可行途径吗?注意分配观点
政策试点项目作为鼓励可持续发展的创新治理正在受到关注。然而,它们的有效性和影响因素存在争议,而这些试点在不同社会注意力集中情况下的影响尚未得到充分探讨。本研究通过对中国碳排放交易试点政策(COTPP)这一市场驱动型环境监管机制的考察,考察了政策试点是否有助于可持续发展。我们使用差异中的差异方法,分析了2011-2021年间13559家公司的观察结果,以评估该政策对企业碳排放的影响。实证结果表明,实施COTPP显著降低了企业碳排放。存在跨组织和区域背景的异质效应。国有企业的减排效果优于非国有企业,东部经济发达地区企业的减排效果优于中西部地区企业。此外,通过政府、公众和媒体参与建立的注意力分配是一个关键的调节因素。政府关注的调节作用最强,其次是公众关注,媒体关注的调节作用最弱,但仍然显著。整合组织异质性和注意力分配框架推进了对政策试点有效性的理论认识,为设计基于市场的环境法规提供了实践见解。这些发现通过阐明如何利用环境因素和非正式机构参与来加强可持续发展,增强了环境治理研究和政策实施实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
366
期刊介绍: The International Review of Financial Analysis (IRFA) is an impartial refereed journal designed to serve as a platform for high-quality financial research. It welcomes a diverse range of financial research topics and maintains an unbiased selection process. While not limited to U.S.-centric subjects, IRFA, as its title suggests, is open to valuable research contributions from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Interlinkages between cryptocurrency classes and the hydrogen economy: New diversification insights from a partial correlation-based connectedness approach Unauthorized immigrants and corporate cash holdings The Crypto Risk Composite Index (CCRI)-advancing risk management in the digital asset space Crypto factor zoo (.Zip) Monetary policy surprises and the cross sectional stock return predictability in volume sorted portfolios
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1