Is policy pilot a viable path to sustainable development? Attention allocation perspective

IF 7.5 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Review of Financial Analysis Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.irfa.2025.103923
Jiapeng Dai
{"title":"Is policy pilot a viable path to sustainable development? Attention allocation perspective","authors":"Jiapeng Dai","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2025.103923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Policy pilot programs are gaining attention as innovative governance to encourage sustainable development. However, their effectiveness and influencing factors are debated, while the impact of these pilots under varying concentrations of societal attention is underexplored. This study examined whether policy pilots can aid in sustainable development by investigatingChina's carbon emissions trade pilot policy (COTPP), a market-driven environmental regulation. Using a difference-in-differences methodology, we analyzed 13,559 firm–year observations spanning 2011–2021 to assess the policy's impact on corporate carbon emissions. The empirical findings indicate that COTPP implementation significantly reduced corporate carbon emissions. There were heterogeneous effects spanning organizational and regional contexts. The emission reduction effect was more distinct for state-owned enterprises (SOEs) than non-SOEs and firms located in the economically developed eastern region relative to those in the central and western regions. Moreover, attention allocation—established through governmental, public, and media engagement—was a critical moderating factor.The moderating effect is strongest for government attention, followed by public attention, with media attention showing the weakest yet still significant effect. Integrating organizational heterogeneity and an attention allocation framework advanced the theoretical understanding of policy pilot effectiveness, providing practical insights for designing market-based environmental regulations. These findings augment environmental governance research and policy implementation practice by elucidating how contextual factors and informal institutional engagement can be leveraged to strengthen sustainable development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48226,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Financial Analysis","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 103923"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Financial Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925000109","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Policy pilot programs are gaining attention as innovative governance to encourage sustainable development. However, their effectiveness and influencing factors are debated, while the impact of these pilots under varying concentrations of societal attention is underexplored. This study examined whether policy pilots can aid in sustainable development by investigatingChina's carbon emissions trade pilot policy (COTPP), a market-driven environmental regulation. Using a difference-in-differences methodology, we analyzed 13,559 firm–year observations spanning 2011–2021 to assess the policy's impact on corporate carbon emissions. The empirical findings indicate that COTPP implementation significantly reduced corporate carbon emissions. There were heterogeneous effects spanning organizational and regional contexts. The emission reduction effect was more distinct for state-owned enterprises (SOEs) than non-SOEs and firms located in the economically developed eastern region relative to those in the central and western regions. Moreover, attention allocation—established through governmental, public, and media engagement—was a critical moderating factor.The moderating effect is strongest for government attention, followed by public attention, with media attention showing the weakest yet still significant effect. Integrating organizational heterogeneity and an attention allocation framework advanced the theoretical understanding of policy pilot effectiveness, providing practical insights for designing market-based environmental regulations. These findings augment environmental governance research and policy implementation practice by elucidating how contextual factors and informal institutional engagement can be leveraged to strengthen sustainable development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
366
期刊介绍: The International Review of Financial Analysis (IRFA) is an impartial refereed journal designed to serve as a platform for high-quality financial research. It welcomes a diverse range of financial research topics and maintains an unbiased selection process. While not limited to U.S.-centric subjects, IRFA, as its title suggests, is open to valuable research contributions from around the world.
期刊最新文献
The role of digital financial inclusion in promoting common prosperity: Evidence from Inner Mongolia Text-based analysis of corporate nationalism and dividend policies in China Editorial Board AI culture ‘profiling’ and anti-money laundering: Efficacy vs ethics Capital regulation, regulatory avoidance, and bank systemic risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1