A single reminder trial updates fear memory and affects extinction in rats housed under different living conditions

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL Learning and Motivation Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102098
Irina V. Pavlova, Nadezda D. Broshevitskaya, Grigory A. Grigoryan
{"title":"A single reminder trial updates fear memory and affects extinction in rats housed under different living conditions","authors":"Irina V. Pavlova,&nbsp;Nadezda D. Broshevitskaya,&nbsp;Grigory A. Grigoryan","doi":"10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of housing of rats in the enriched environment (EE), social isolation (SI), overcrowding (CROW) and standard (STAND) conditions on the updating, reconsolidation and subsequent extinction of fear memory. Male and female rats were placed in different conditions from 30 to 120 postnatal days (PND). At PND 90 in all rats, the fear conditioning was elaborated. 24 hours later, half of the rats were re-exposed to the same context and cue presentation (Re+) and the other half did not receive re-exposure (Re-). After a further 24 hours, the retention test was used to assess reconsolidation of contextual and cue memory. For the next 2 days, the extinction of the conditioned fear response by applying 10 non-reinforced trials each day was carried out. In the retention test, the freezing time in response to the context or tone in Re+ groups housed in the STAND, EE or CROW conditions was substantially less than in Re- groups, which indicated memory updating. The freezing time to the tone in the SI Re+ vs. Re- groups were about the same and the freezing time in the SI Re+ was significantly longer than in the Re+ groups in STAND and CROW conditions. The decrease of the freezing time in response to the cue presentation in Re+ vs. Re- rats was maximal in the CROW group. The changes in fear memory elicited by reactivation persisted during the extinction trials. The results obtained indicate that the reactivation procedure in the SI rats does not update fear memory, and the memory of the CROW rats was the least stable. Two types of psychosocial stresses, social isolation and overcrowding, have multidirectional effects on the reconsolidation of fear memory.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47305,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Motivation","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 102098"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Motivation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023969025000050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of housing of rats in the enriched environment (EE), social isolation (SI), overcrowding (CROW) and standard (STAND) conditions on the updating, reconsolidation and subsequent extinction of fear memory. Male and female rats were placed in different conditions from 30 to 120 postnatal days (PND). At PND 90 in all rats, the fear conditioning was elaborated. 24 hours later, half of the rats were re-exposed to the same context and cue presentation (Re+) and the other half did not receive re-exposure (Re-). After a further 24 hours, the retention test was used to assess reconsolidation of contextual and cue memory. For the next 2 days, the extinction of the conditioned fear response by applying 10 non-reinforced trials each day was carried out. In the retention test, the freezing time in response to the context or tone in Re+ groups housed in the STAND, EE or CROW conditions was substantially less than in Re- groups, which indicated memory updating. The freezing time to the tone in the SI Re+ vs. Re- groups were about the same and the freezing time in the SI Re+ was significantly longer than in the Re+ groups in STAND and CROW conditions. The decrease of the freezing time in response to the cue presentation in Re+ vs. Re- rats was maximal in the CROW group. The changes in fear memory elicited by reactivation persisted during the extinction trials. The results obtained indicate that the reactivation procedure in the SI rats does not update fear memory, and the memory of the CROW rats was the least stable. Two types of psychosocial stresses, social isolation and overcrowding, have multidirectional effects on the reconsolidation of fear memory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Learning and Motivation features original experimental research devoted to the analysis of basic phenomena and mechanisms of learning, memory, and motivation. These studies, involving either animal or human subjects, examine behavioral, biological, and evolutionary influences on the learning and motivation processes, and often report on an integrated series of experiments that advance knowledge in this field. Theoretical papers and shorter reports are also considered.
期刊最新文献
Mapping academic motivation, self-efficacy, achievement emotions, and vocabulary learning in a game-enhanced learning environment from the lens of activity theory Uncovering the state of academic motivation, achievement emotion, self- confidence, and achievement goals in online/offline language instruction Writing with motivation: To delve into the impacts of modifications in academic materials on learners' motivation, creativity, and writing progress in online instruction Pre-exposure effect in social foraging: A study with groups of pigeons (Columba livia) Impact of observational modeling on quiet eye duration and free-throw performance in basketball
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1