Mood affects attention in knowledge-free reasoning task, not scores

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL Learning and Motivation Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102099
Paulo G. Laurence , Elizeu Coutinho Macedo
{"title":"Mood affects attention in knowledge-free reasoning task, not scores","authors":"Paulo G. Laurence ,&nbsp;Elizeu Coutinho Macedo","doi":"10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent research disputes the idea that acute stress affects academic performance when prior knowledge is controlled, challenging the interference hypothesis. However, the impact of mood on cognitive performance in knowledge-free tests, such as matrix reasoning tasks, remains unclear. This study examines the effects of positive and negative mood inductions on matrix reasoning performance, focusing on behavioral and eye movement measures. Experiment 1 confirmed effective mood induction, with the negative valence group showing increased stress. Experiment 2 found that while mood induction did not affect overall performance, it influenced attention allocation. Participants in the positive valence group displayed a less structured scanpath than those in the negative valence group. These results question the interference hypothesis, suggesting that stress does not impair performance in knowledge-free tasks and highlight the importance of attention allocation in educational assessment contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47305,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Motivation","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 102099"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Motivation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023969025000062","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent research disputes the idea that acute stress affects academic performance when prior knowledge is controlled, challenging the interference hypothesis. However, the impact of mood on cognitive performance in knowledge-free tests, such as matrix reasoning tasks, remains unclear. This study examines the effects of positive and negative mood inductions on matrix reasoning performance, focusing on behavioral and eye movement measures. Experiment 1 confirmed effective mood induction, with the negative valence group showing increased stress. Experiment 2 found that while mood induction did not affect overall performance, it influenced attention allocation. Participants in the positive valence group displayed a less structured scanpath than those in the negative valence group. These results question the interference hypothesis, suggesting that stress does not impair performance in knowledge-free tasks and highlight the importance of attention allocation in educational assessment contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在无知识推理任务中,情绪影响注意力,而不是分数
最近的研究对先前知识受到控制时急性压力会影响学习成绩的观点提出了质疑,挑战了干扰假说。然而,情绪对无知识测试(如矩阵推理任务)中认知表现的影响尚不清楚。本研究考察了积极和消极情绪诱导对矩阵推理表现的影响,重点是行为和眼动测量。实验1证实了有效的情绪诱导,负效价组表现出压力增加。实验2发现,虽然情绪诱导不影响整体表现,但它影响了注意力分配。正价组的参与者比负价组的参与者表现出更少的结构化扫描路径。这些结果质疑了干扰假说,表明压力不会影响学生在无知识任务中的表现,并强调了在教育评估环境中注意力分配的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Learning and Motivation features original experimental research devoted to the analysis of basic phenomena and mechanisms of learning, memory, and motivation. These studies, involving either animal or human subjects, examine behavioral, biological, and evolutionary influences on the learning and motivation processes, and often report on an integrated series of experiments that advance knowledge in this field. Theoretical papers and shorter reports are also considered.
期刊最新文献
Modulating suboptimal choice: The role of motivation level and magnitude vs. probability version in university students Reinforcement under uncertainty and expectancy-value dynamics: Effects of probabilistic feedback in an AI-mediated learning environment on motivation, emotion regulation, and learning engagement AI-assisted grammar instruction: Grammar learning outcomes and psychological variables in teaching Turkish as a foreign language Autonomy support and enhanced expectancy in motor learning: An investigation in older adults Variable versus fixed reward schedules in gamified vocabulary learning contexts: A self-determination theory mixed-methods study of motivation, grit, and learning persistence among undergraduate EFL learners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1