Human factors and design evaluation of digital blood pressure/pulse meters.

Medical instrumentation Pub Date : 1988-10-01
D W Harrison, P M Gorelczenko, P L Kelly
{"title":"Human factors and design evaluation of digital blood pressure/pulse meters.","authors":"D W Harrison,&nbsp;P M Gorelczenko,&nbsp;P L Kelly","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study provides a comparison of self-measurement blood pressure devices, with respect to the standards published by the American National Standards Institute/Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation and statements from the American Heart Association and the National High Blood Pressure Education Program. The results show a wide disparity among the recommendations of select committees, on issues of education and compliance and on design features of this instrumentation. Procedural problems in determining compliance in this study highlight the need for improved objectivity in statements in national standards and for improved awareness of those statements by manufacturers.</p>","PeriodicalId":76133,"journal":{"name":"Medical instrumentation","volume":"22 5","pages":"226-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical instrumentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study provides a comparison of self-measurement blood pressure devices, with respect to the standards published by the American National Standards Institute/Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation and statements from the American Heart Association and the National High Blood Pressure Education Program. The results show a wide disparity among the recommendations of select committees, on issues of education and compliance and on design features of this instrumentation. Procedural problems in determining compliance in this study highlight the need for improved objectivity in statements in national standards and for improved awareness of those statements by manufacturers.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字血压/脉搏仪的人为因素及设计评价。
根据美国国家标准协会/医疗器械进步协会发布的标准和美国心脏协会和国家高血压教育计划的声明,本研究提供了自我测量血压设备的比较。结果表明,在教育和遵守问题以及该仪器的设计特点方面,各选择委员会的建议存在很大差异。在本研究中确定是否遵守的程序问题突出表明,需要提高国家标准说明的客观性,并提高制造商对这些说明的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Physical fitness in the elderly. Anesthesia delivery systems. Effects of using potassium adsorption filters on saline-filled and saline-removed methods for the removal of potassium from red blood cell solutions Plasma viscosity and whole blood viscosity as diagnostic tools of blood abnormalities by using simple syringe method A technique for measuring spatial distribution of electromagnetic fields created by radio-frequency coils in MRI scanners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1