Predictive factors for response to viscosupplementation in patients with knee osteoarthritis: an analysis of clinical and imaging factors

Gustavo Rossanese Pinto , Guilherme Conforto Gracitelli , Fernando Cury Rezende , Claudio Gattas , Thais Cristina Pereira Vasques , Flavio Duarte Silva , Carlos Eduardo da Silveira Franciozi , Marcus Vinicius Malheiros Luzo
{"title":"Predictive factors for response to viscosupplementation in patients with knee osteoarthritis: an analysis of clinical and imaging factors","authors":"Gustavo Rossanese Pinto ,&nbsp;Guilherme Conforto Gracitelli ,&nbsp;Fernando Cury Rezende ,&nbsp;Claudio Gattas ,&nbsp;Thais Cristina Pereira Vasques ,&nbsp;Flavio Duarte Silva ,&nbsp;Carlos Eduardo da Silveira Franciozi ,&nbsp;Marcus Vinicius Malheiros Luzo","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjp.2024.100181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Despite the widespread use of viscosupplementation (VS) in the treatment of knee arthritis, the factors that may influence its effectiveness or failure are still controversial and little explored in the literature.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To identify clinical, radiographic, and magnetic resonance imaging predictive factors associated with VS failure in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this prospective study, patients with knee osteoarthritis were evaluated for predictive factors before the intervention, including radiographic images (Kellgren-Lawrence [KL] classification and femorotibial angle), magnetic resonance images Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) and meniscal extrusion, joint effusion, body mass index, previous surgery, sex, and age. All patients received a single intra-articular dose of Synolis-VA 4 mL (80 mg hyaluronic acid<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->160 mg sorbitol). The WOMAC (Western Ontario Mcmaster Universities Arthritis Index), Visual Analog Scale, and SF-12v2 questionnaires were administered at baseline, 15<!--> <!-->days, 3<!--> <!-->months, and 6<!--> <!-->months of clinical follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The results showed a significant reduction in WOMAC and Visual Analog Scale scores for all evaluated times after VS compared to baseline. Using the OMERACT-OARSI (Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials-Osteoarthritis Research Society International) criteria, 53 patients were classified as the \"success group\" and 55 patients as the \"failure group.\" The KL classification and MOAKS score showed a significant difference between these 2 groups, <em>P</em> = .042 and <em>P</em> = .009, respectively. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a KL classification of 3 or 4 and MOAKS score predicted a higher risk of failure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients with a KL classification of 3 or 4 or a high MOAKS score were more likely to fail VS, while the other analyzed factors showed no significant difference.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100760,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation","volume":"4 4","pages":"Article 100181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667254524000179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Despite the widespread use of viscosupplementation (VS) in the treatment of knee arthritis, the factors that may influence its effectiveness or failure are still controversial and little explored in the literature.

Objectives

To identify clinical, radiographic, and magnetic resonance imaging predictive factors associated with VS failure in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

Methods

In this prospective study, patients with knee osteoarthritis were evaluated for predictive factors before the intervention, including radiographic images (Kellgren-Lawrence [KL] classification and femorotibial angle), magnetic resonance images Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) and meniscal extrusion, joint effusion, body mass index, previous surgery, sex, and age. All patients received a single intra-articular dose of Synolis-VA 4 mL (80 mg hyaluronic acid + 160 mg sorbitol). The WOMAC (Western Ontario Mcmaster Universities Arthritis Index), Visual Analog Scale, and SF-12v2 questionnaires were administered at baseline, 15 days, 3 months, and 6 months of clinical follow-up.

Results

The results showed a significant reduction in WOMAC and Visual Analog Scale scores for all evaluated times after VS compared to baseline. Using the OMERACT-OARSI (Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials-Osteoarthritis Research Society International) criteria, 53 patients were classified as the "success group" and 55 patients as the "failure group." The KL classification and MOAKS score showed a significant difference between these 2 groups, P = .042 and P = .009, respectively. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a KL classification of 3 or 4 and MOAKS score predicted a higher risk of failure.

Conclusions

Patients with a KL classification of 3 or 4 or a high MOAKS score were more likely to fail VS, while the other analyzed factors showed no significant difference.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膝关节骨关节炎患者对补充粘胶反应的预测因素:临床和影像学因素分析
尽管在膝关节关节炎的治疗中广泛使用补充粘剂(VS),但可能影响其有效性或失败的因素仍然存在争议,文献中很少探讨。目的探讨与膝关节骨关节炎治疗中VS失效相关的临床、影像学和磁共振成像预测因素。方法在这项前瞻性研究中,对膝关节骨性关节炎患者进行干预前的预测因素评估,包括影像学检查(Kellgren-Lawrence [KL]分类和股骨胫骨角度)、磁共振成像骨性关节炎膝关节评分(MOAKS)和半月板挤压、关节积液、体重指数、既往手术、性别和年龄。所有患者均接受单次关节内剂量Synolis-VA 4ml (80 mg透明质酸+ 160 mg山梨醇)。在基线、15天、3个月和6个月的临床随访中进行WOMAC (Western Ontario Mcmaster university Arthritis Index)、视觉模拟量表和SF-12v2问卷调查。结果与基线相比,VS后所有评估时间的WOMAC和视觉模拟量表得分均显著降低。使用OMERACT-OARSI(类风湿关节炎临床试验结果测量-国际骨关节炎研究学会)标准,53例患者被分类为“成功组”,55例患者被分类为“失败组”。两组患者KL分型及MOAKS评分差异有统计学意义,P = 0.042, P = 0.009。单变量逻辑回归分析显示,KL分类为3或4,MOAKS评分预测较高的失败风险。结论KL评分为3分、4分或MOAKS评分较高的患者VS失败的可能性较大,其他因素分析差异无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Welcome to the fourth issue of JCJP 2025 Return to sports and physical activity after implantable shock absorber surgery for patients with medial knee osteoarthritis The implantable shock absorber for medial compartment unloading of the knee: a scoping review Quantifying the effect of hinge axis orientation on the posterior tibial slope angle during medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1