Seasonal Climate Effects in Sagebrush-Steppe Plant Community Production

IF 2.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Rangeland Ecology & Management Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rama.2024.08.028
Merilynn C. Schantz , Stuart P. Hardegree , Jon D. Bates , Jeremy J. James , Kirk W. Davies , Roger L. Sheley
{"title":"Seasonal Climate Effects in Sagebrush-Steppe Plant Community Production","authors":"Merilynn C. Schantz ,&nbsp;Stuart P. Hardegree ,&nbsp;Jon D. Bates ,&nbsp;Jeremy J. James ,&nbsp;Kirk W. Davies ,&nbsp;Roger L. Sheley","doi":"10.1016/j.rama.2024.08.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate models and forecasts of plant production are a critical need of stakeholders across the Great Basin for making decisions about seasonal livestock management in a region that is increasingly impacted by wildfires, invasive species and yearly variability in seasonal climate. High quality and spatiotemporally complete gridded climate forecasts are now available through the Climate Prediction Center (CPC) and North American Multi-Model Ensemble (NMME) programs, but these forecasts are limited to monthly precipitation and temperature parameters. A necessary first step to creating plant production forecasts is to quantify the spatiotemporal relationships between plant production and these basic climate inputs. The objective of this study was to quantify how seasonal precipitation and temperature affected plant production among the plant species <em>Poa secunda</em> and the functional groups of perennial grasses, perennial forbs, annual grasses, and annual forbs within five ecological states in the Great Basin Sagebrush Steppe over a 10-year period. In general, cooler and wetter spring conditions and cooler summer temperatures in the preceding year were the strongest drivers of plant production across most ecological states and within plant functional groups. These differences were, however, dependent on the given ecological state and plant functional group. These findings indicate that plant production forecasting is feasible for this ecosystem during the growing season when using the climate metrics provided by the CPC and NMME program.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49634,"journal":{"name":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","volume":"98 ","pages":"Pages 620-628"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550742424001593","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate models and forecasts of plant production are a critical need of stakeholders across the Great Basin for making decisions about seasonal livestock management in a region that is increasingly impacted by wildfires, invasive species and yearly variability in seasonal climate. High quality and spatiotemporally complete gridded climate forecasts are now available through the Climate Prediction Center (CPC) and North American Multi-Model Ensemble (NMME) programs, but these forecasts are limited to monthly precipitation and temperature parameters. A necessary first step to creating plant production forecasts is to quantify the spatiotemporal relationships between plant production and these basic climate inputs. The objective of this study was to quantify how seasonal precipitation and temperature affected plant production among the plant species Poa secunda and the functional groups of perennial grasses, perennial forbs, annual grasses, and annual forbs within five ecological states in the Great Basin Sagebrush Steppe over a 10-year period. In general, cooler and wetter spring conditions and cooler summer temperatures in the preceding year were the strongest drivers of plant production across most ecological states and within plant functional groups. These differences were, however, dependent on the given ecological state and plant functional group. These findings indicate that plant production forecasting is feasible for this ecosystem during the growing season when using the climate metrics provided by the CPC and NMME program.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rangeland Ecology & Management
Rangeland Ecology & Management 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Rangeland Ecology & Management publishes all topics-including ecology, management, socioeconomic and policy-pertaining to global rangelands. The journal''s mission is to inform academics, ecosystem managers and policy makers of science-based information to promote sound rangeland stewardship. Author submissions are published in five manuscript categories: original research papers, high-profile forum topics, concept syntheses, as well as research and technical notes. Rangelands represent approximately 50% of the Earth''s land area and provision multiple ecosystem services for large human populations. This expansive and diverse land area functions as coupled human-ecological systems. Knowledge of both social and biophysical system components and their interactions represent the foundation for informed rangeland stewardship. Rangeland Ecology & Management uniquely integrates information from multiple system components to address current and pending challenges confronting global rangelands.
期刊最新文献
Breeding Season Survival and Habitat Use of Scaled Quail in Southeastern New Mexico Seed-Yield Components, Reproductive Health, and Ecological Fitness of Six Snake River Wheatgrass Populations Ecosystem Dynamics in Wet Heathlands: Spatial and Temporal Effects of Environmental Drivers on the Vegetation The Social Fit of Conservation Policy on Working Landscapes Table of Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1