Gender Differences in Electronic Health Record Inbox Message Volumes Among Pediatric Surgeon Specialists

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Journal of pediatric surgery Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162191
Darren Ha , Nicole Russell , Kaitlin E. Olson , Gina M. Whitney , Ann M. Kulungowski , Emily McCourt , Kyle O. Rove
{"title":"Gender Differences in Electronic Health Record Inbox Message Volumes Among Pediatric Surgeon Specialists","authors":"Darren Ha ,&nbsp;Nicole Russell ,&nbsp;Kaitlin E. Olson ,&nbsp;Gina M. Whitney ,&nbsp;Ann M. Kulungowski ,&nbsp;Emily McCourt ,&nbsp;Kyle O. Rove","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Prior studies examined the relationship between physician sex and electronic health records (EHR) utilization patterns to assess for provider gender equity, although this has not been explored among pediatric surgical subspecialists. We hypothesized that female surgeons received more inbox messages and had longer message lengths compared to male surgeons.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Surgeons who performed at least five surgical procedures at a free-standing children's hospital between January 2021 and December 2022 were stratified based on sex. EHR utilization data were retrospectively extracted. Message types were restricted to those from patients, health care team members, or results, opting to omit other automated messages from the EHR that were not initiated by a person. Primary outcomes were number of inbox messages received adjusting for the volume of surgical cases performed and message length. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify outcome predictors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>41 female and 79 male surgeons were included in the final analysis. There was a median of 693 messages received by surgeons over the study period (median of 1.8 messages per surgeon per case). Male surgeons tended to be further out from training but there were no significant differences in terms of surgical case count or characteristics. Surgeon sex was a significant predictor of inbox message count in univariate analysis (incidence rate ratio 1.58 favoring female surgeons, p = 0.03), but not in multivariate analysis, after correcting for case complexity. Surgeon sex was not a significant predictor of message length in either univariate or multivariate analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Surgeon sex was not a significant predictor of inbox message count or message length among a cohort of pediatric surgical subspecialists. Ensuring gender equity with respect to EHR activities reaffirms our commitment to avoiding bias.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>III.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric surgery","volume":"60 4","pages":"Article 162191"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022346825000363","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Prior studies examined the relationship between physician sex and electronic health records (EHR) utilization patterns to assess for provider gender equity, although this has not been explored among pediatric surgical subspecialists. We hypothesized that female surgeons received more inbox messages and had longer message lengths compared to male surgeons.

Methods

Surgeons who performed at least five surgical procedures at a free-standing children's hospital between January 2021 and December 2022 were stratified based on sex. EHR utilization data were retrospectively extracted. Message types were restricted to those from patients, health care team members, or results, opting to omit other automated messages from the EHR that were not initiated by a person. Primary outcomes were number of inbox messages received adjusting for the volume of surgical cases performed and message length. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify outcome predictors.

Results

41 female and 79 male surgeons were included in the final analysis. There was a median of 693 messages received by surgeons over the study period (median of 1.8 messages per surgeon per case). Male surgeons tended to be further out from training but there were no significant differences in terms of surgical case count or characteristics. Surgeon sex was a significant predictor of inbox message count in univariate analysis (incidence rate ratio 1.58 favoring female surgeons, p = 0.03), but not in multivariate analysis, after correcting for case complexity. Surgeon sex was not a significant predictor of message length in either univariate or multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

Surgeon sex was not a significant predictor of inbox message count or message length among a cohort of pediatric surgical subspecialists. Ensuring gender equity with respect to EHR activities reaffirms our commitment to avoiding bias.

Level of evidence

III.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科外科专家电子健康记录收件箱信息量的性别差异
先前的研究考察了医生性别与电子健康记录(EHR)使用模式之间的关系,以评估提供者性别平等,尽管尚未在儿科外科专科医生中进行探讨。我们假设与男性外科医生相比,女性外科医生收到的收件箱信息更多,信息长度也更长。方法对2021年1月至2022年12月期间在一家独立儿童医院进行至少5次手术的外科医生进行性别分层。回顾性提取电子病历的使用数据。消息类型被限制为来自患者、医疗团队成员或结果的消息,选择忽略来自EHR的其他非由个人发起的自动消息。主要结果是收到的收件箱信息的数量,根据手术病例的数量和信息的长度进行调整。进行单因素和多因素分析以确定结果预测因子。结果女41例,男79例。在研究期间,外科医生收到的信息中位数为693条(每位外科医生每个病例收到的信息中位数为1.8条)。男性外科医生更倾向于接受培训,但在手术病例数或特征方面没有显著差异。在单变量分析中,外科医生性别是收件箱邮件数量的显著预测因子(发病率比1.58有利于女性外科医生,p = 0.03),但在校正病例复杂性后的多变量分析中则不是。无论是单因素分析还是多因素分析,外科医生性别都不是信息长度的显著预测因子。结论:在儿科外科专科队列中,外科医生性别不是收件箱信息数量或信息长度的显著预测因子。确保电子健康档案活动中的性别平等重申了我们对避免偏见的承诺。证据水平ii。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
569
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The journal presents original contributions as well as a complete international abstracts section and other special departments to provide the most current source of information and references in pediatric surgery. The journal is based on the need to improve the surgical care of infants and children, not only through advances in physiology, pathology and surgical techniques, but also by attention to the unique emotional and physical needs of the young patient.
期刊最新文献
State legislation and surgical demand: Operative needs of Texas infants after early abortion ban Progression of esophageal atresia associated Barrett’s esophagus in adulthood – Is endoscopic surveillance worth it? Is there any difference between surgical and endoscopic interventions related to the outcome of recurrent tracheoesophageal fistulas? A systematic review Post-extraction management of esophageal button battery injuries in children: A scoping review of imaging, ICU admission, and NPO practices Definitive ileostomy in total colonic aganglionosis: results and considerations from a single-center experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1