Intrarenal Pressure Monitoring During Ureteroscopy: A Delphi Panel Consensus

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY European Urology Open Science Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1016/j.euros.2025.01.005
Bhaskar Somani , Niall Davis , Esteban Emiliani , Mehmet Ilker Göcke , Helene Jung , Etienne Xavier Keller , Arkadiusz Miernik , Silvia Proietti , Ben Turney , Oliver Wiseman , Antonia Bosworth Smith , Marco Caterino , Rhodri Saunders , Mohammed Boulmani , Olivier Traxer
{"title":"Intrarenal Pressure Monitoring During Ureteroscopy: A Delphi Panel Consensus","authors":"Bhaskar Somani ,&nbsp;Niall Davis ,&nbsp;Esteban Emiliani ,&nbsp;Mehmet Ilker Göcke ,&nbsp;Helene Jung ,&nbsp;Etienne Xavier Keller ,&nbsp;Arkadiusz Miernik ,&nbsp;Silvia Proietti ,&nbsp;Ben Turney ,&nbsp;Oliver Wiseman ,&nbsp;Antonia Bosworth Smith ,&nbsp;Marco Caterino ,&nbsp;Rhodri Saunders ,&nbsp;Mohammed Boulmani ,&nbsp;Olivier Traxer","doi":"10.1016/j.euros.2025.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Elevated intrarenal pressure (IRP) may increase the risk of complications in patients undergoing ureteroscopy. As there is limited clarity on a threshold value for high IRP, how to manage high IRP, or which patients are at greater risk of complications due to high IRP, we used the Delphi methodology to understand expert opinion in this area.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Delphi process comprised two online surveys and an in-person meeting. During the in-person meeting, areas of disagreement and consensus were explored. Consensus statements were developed and voted on to determine the level of consensus. The study was granted a waiver by HML IRB Research and Ethics (reference number 2193).</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>The pan-European panel started with 12 and ended with 11 experienced endourologists. Eleven consensus statements were developed. The statements cover topics such as the definition of high IRP, complications linked to high IRP, and patient risk factors for these complications. After anonymous voting, consensus was achieved for all the statements. Two had a strong level and nine had a moderate level of agreement. There was no consensus on an IRP threshold, although the majority would be concerned for patient safety at a pressure above 61–80 cm H<sub>2</sub>O.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>Any IRP above normal physiological levels should be considered high. High IRP during ureteroscopy is a concern for patient safety. It is important to understand links between high IRP, patient characteristics, and complications. We call for additional research to better understand these risks and to inform refinements to clinical practice.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>A group of experts were asked their opinion on pressure within the kidney (intrarenal pressure, IRP) during a procedure called ureteroscopy (URS), when a narrow telescope is passed through the bladder and into the tube connected to the kidney. Statements that the panel agreed on were developed. These statements show that there is a concern about high IRP during URS as it may be linked to a higher risk of complications for the patient. More research is needed to better understand high IRP and its link to patient outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"73 ","pages":"Pages 43-50"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Urology Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168325000448","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective

Elevated intrarenal pressure (IRP) may increase the risk of complications in patients undergoing ureteroscopy. As there is limited clarity on a threshold value for high IRP, how to manage high IRP, or which patients are at greater risk of complications due to high IRP, we used the Delphi methodology to understand expert opinion in this area.

Methods

The Delphi process comprised two online surveys and an in-person meeting. During the in-person meeting, areas of disagreement and consensus were explored. Consensus statements were developed and voted on to determine the level of consensus. The study was granted a waiver by HML IRB Research and Ethics (reference number 2193).

Key findings and limitations

The pan-European panel started with 12 and ended with 11 experienced endourologists. Eleven consensus statements were developed. The statements cover topics such as the definition of high IRP, complications linked to high IRP, and patient risk factors for these complications. After anonymous voting, consensus was achieved for all the statements. Two had a strong level and nine had a moderate level of agreement. There was no consensus on an IRP threshold, although the majority would be concerned for patient safety at a pressure above 61–80 cm H2O.

Conclusions and clinical implications

Any IRP above normal physiological levels should be considered high. High IRP during ureteroscopy is a concern for patient safety. It is important to understand links between high IRP, patient characteristics, and complications. We call for additional research to better understand these risks and to inform refinements to clinical practice.

Patient summary

A group of experts were asked their opinion on pressure within the kidney (intrarenal pressure, IRP) during a procedure called ureteroscopy (URS), when a narrow telescope is passed through the bladder and into the tube connected to the kidney. Statements that the panel agreed on were developed. These statements show that there is a concern about high IRP during URS as it may be linked to a higher risk of complications for the patient. More research is needed to better understand high IRP and its link to patient outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
输尿管镜下肾内压监测:德尔菲小组共识
背景与目的肾内压升高可能增加输尿管镜检查患者发生并发症的风险。由于高IRP的阈值,如何管理高IRP,以及哪些患者因高IRP而面临更大的并发症风险,我们使用德尔菲方法来了解这一领域的专家意见。方法德尔菲过程包括两次在线调查和一次面对面会议。在面对面的会谈中,双方探讨了存在分歧和共识的领域。制定共识声明并进行表决,以确定共识的程度。该研究获得了html IRB研究与伦理(参考编号2193)的豁免。主要发现和局限性泛欧洲小组由12名开始,11名经验丰富的腔内专家结束。制定了11项协商一致声明。这些陈述涵盖了诸如高IRP的定义、与高IRP相关的并发症以及这些并发症的患者危险因素等主题。经过不记名投票,所有发言达成一致。2人有强烈认同,9人有中等认同。对于IRP阈值没有达成共识,尽管大多数人会关注患者在高于61-80 cm H2O的压力下的安全。结论及临床意义任何高于正常生理水平的IRP均应考虑为高。输尿管镜检查时的高IRP是患者安全的一个问题。了解高IRP、患者特征和并发症之间的联系是很重要的。我们呼吁进行更多的研究,以更好地了解这些风险,并为临床实践提供改进信息。在输尿管镜检查(URS)过程中,一组专家被问及他们对肾内压力(肾内压力,IRP)的看法。输尿管镜检查是通过一个狭窄的望远镜穿过膀胱,进入连接肾脏的管子。制定了小组商定的声明。这些陈述表明,泌尿道尿路手术期间的高IRP值得关注,因为它可能与患者并发症的高风险有关。需要更多的研究来更好地了解高IRP及其与患者预后的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Urology Open Science
European Urology Open Science UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1183
审稿时长
49 days
期刊最新文献
Trifecta Outcomes after Robotic Sacrocolpopexy with Dual Mesh in Single-center Cohort Beyond Discrimination Metrics: A Bayesian Reinterpretation of S2,3PSA% for Individual Patient Counseling Reduced Rate of Complications With Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: Real-world Data From a National Cohort Derived From the Danish Prostate Cancer Registry Familial Risks in 317 000 Patients With Prostate Cancer in Relation to Metastases and Survival-Guiding Diagnostics Role of Local Treatment to the Prostate in Patients With de Novo Low-volume Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer Receiving Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1