Intrarenal Pressure Monitoring During Ureteroscopy: A Delphi Panel Consensus

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY European Urology Open Science Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1016/j.euros.2025.01.005
Bhaskar Somani , Niall Davis , Esteban Emiliani , Mehmet Ilker Göcke , Helene Jung , Etienne Xavier Keller , Arkadiusz Miernik , Silvia Proietti , Ben Turney , Oliver Wiseman , Antonia Bosworth Smith , Marco Caterino , Rhodri Saunders , Mohammed Boulmani , Olivier Traxer
{"title":"Intrarenal Pressure Monitoring During Ureteroscopy: A Delphi Panel Consensus","authors":"Bhaskar Somani ,&nbsp;Niall Davis ,&nbsp;Esteban Emiliani ,&nbsp;Mehmet Ilker Göcke ,&nbsp;Helene Jung ,&nbsp;Etienne Xavier Keller ,&nbsp;Arkadiusz Miernik ,&nbsp;Silvia Proietti ,&nbsp;Ben Turney ,&nbsp;Oliver Wiseman ,&nbsp;Antonia Bosworth Smith ,&nbsp;Marco Caterino ,&nbsp;Rhodri Saunders ,&nbsp;Mohammed Boulmani ,&nbsp;Olivier Traxer","doi":"10.1016/j.euros.2025.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Elevated intrarenal pressure (IRP) may increase the risk of complications in patients undergoing ureteroscopy. As there is limited clarity on a threshold value for high IRP, how to manage high IRP, or which patients are at greater risk of complications due to high IRP, we used the Delphi methodology to understand expert opinion in this area.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Delphi process comprised two online surveys and an in-person meeting. During the in-person meeting, areas of disagreement and consensus were explored. Consensus statements were developed and voted on to determine the level of consensus. The study was granted a waiver by HML IRB Research and Ethics (reference number 2193).</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>The pan-European panel started with 12 and ended with 11 experienced endourologists. Eleven consensus statements were developed. The statements cover topics such as the definition of high IRP, complications linked to high IRP, and patient risk factors for these complications. After anonymous voting, consensus was achieved for all the statements. Two had a strong level and nine had a moderate level of agreement. There was no consensus on an IRP threshold, although the majority would be concerned for patient safety at a pressure above 61–80 cm H<sub>2</sub>O.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>Any IRP above normal physiological levels should be considered high. High IRP during ureteroscopy is a concern for patient safety. It is important to understand links between high IRP, patient characteristics, and complications. We call for additional research to better understand these risks and to inform refinements to clinical practice.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>A group of experts were asked their opinion on pressure within the kidney (intrarenal pressure, IRP) during a procedure called ureteroscopy (URS), when a narrow telescope is passed through the bladder and into the tube connected to the kidney. Statements that the panel agreed on were developed. These statements show that there is a concern about high IRP during URS as it may be linked to a higher risk of complications for the patient. More research is needed to better understand high IRP and its link to patient outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"73 ","pages":"Pages 43-50"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Urology Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168325000448","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective

Elevated intrarenal pressure (IRP) may increase the risk of complications in patients undergoing ureteroscopy. As there is limited clarity on a threshold value for high IRP, how to manage high IRP, or which patients are at greater risk of complications due to high IRP, we used the Delphi methodology to understand expert opinion in this area.

Methods

The Delphi process comprised two online surveys and an in-person meeting. During the in-person meeting, areas of disagreement and consensus were explored. Consensus statements were developed and voted on to determine the level of consensus. The study was granted a waiver by HML IRB Research and Ethics (reference number 2193).

Key findings and limitations

The pan-European panel started with 12 and ended with 11 experienced endourologists. Eleven consensus statements were developed. The statements cover topics such as the definition of high IRP, complications linked to high IRP, and patient risk factors for these complications. After anonymous voting, consensus was achieved for all the statements. Two had a strong level and nine had a moderate level of agreement. There was no consensus on an IRP threshold, although the majority would be concerned for patient safety at a pressure above 61–80 cm H2O.

Conclusions and clinical implications

Any IRP above normal physiological levels should be considered high. High IRP during ureteroscopy is a concern for patient safety. It is important to understand links between high IRP, patient characteristics, and complications. We call for additional research to better understand these risks and to inform refinements to clinical practice.

Patient summary

A group of experts were asked their opinion on pressure within the kidney (intrarenal pressure, IRP) during a procedure called ureteroscopy (URS), when a narrow telescope is passed through the bladder and into the tube connected to the kidney. Statements that the panel agreed on were developed. These statements show that there is a concern about high IRP during URS as it may be linked to a higher risk of complications for the patient. More research is needed to better understand high IRP and its link to patient outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Urology Open Science
European Urology Open Science UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1183
审稿时长
49 days
期刊最新文献
Meta-analysis of Germline Whole-exome Sequencing in 1435 Cases of Testicular Germ Cell Tumour to Evaluate Disruptive Mutations Under Dominant, Recessive, and X-linked Inheritance Models Incidence and Risk of Thromboembolic and Cardiovascular Adverse Events with PARP Inhibitor Treatment in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Safety Meta-analysis Biochemical Hypogonadism in Aging Testicular Cancer Survivors: A Clinical Challenge Economic Evaluation of Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Early and Late Complications Associated with Penile Cancer Surgery and the Impact of Human Papillomavirus Status: Findings from a Retrospective Norwegian Cohort Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1