A qualitative exploration of the management of impaired driving in medicinal cannabis patients

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2024.12.017
T. Mieran, J. Davey, B. Rowland
{"title":"A qualitative exploration of the management of impaired driving in medicinal cannabis patients","authors":"T. Mieran,&nbsp;J. Davey,&nbsp;B. Rowland","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.12.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aimed to identify the strategies that medicinal cannabis patients employ to manage the risk of impaired driving, and the aetiological factors that influence the use of these strategies. A sample of medicinal cannabis patients (<em>N</em> = 58) from Queensland, Australia, participated in qualitative interviews. Thematic analysis revealed that medicinal cannabis patients employ a variety of strategies to mitigate impaired driving risk, despite commonly reporting driving after the recent use of cannabis. These strategies included the subjective assessment of impairment, waiting a specific post-consumption time-period, regulating cannabis consumption and driving behaviour, and adjusting on-road driving behaviour. Perceptions of safety, deterrence mechanisms, knowledge, and the perceived right and need to drive all influenced the extent and type of risk management undertaken. The implications of these findings for policy, enforcement, and future research surrounding medicinal cannabis and driving are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"109 ","pages":"Pages 354-366"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824003589","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the strategies that medicinal cannabis patients employ to manage the risk of impaired driving, and the aetiological factors that influence the use of these strategies. A sample of medicinal cannabis patients (N = 58) from Queensland, Australia, participated in qualitative interviews. Thematic analysis revealed that medicinal cannabis patients employ a variety of strategies to mitigate impaired driving risk, despite commonly reporting driving after the recent use of cannabis. These strategies included the subjective assessment of impairment, waiting a specific post-consumption time-period, regulating cannabis consumption and driving behaviour, and adjusting on-road driving behaviour. Perceptions of safety, deterrence mechanisms, knowledge, and the perceived right and need to drive all influenced the extent and type of risk management undertaken. The implications of these findings for policy, enforcement, and future research surrounding medicinal cannabis and driving are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药用大麻患者驾驶障碍管理的定性探讨
本研究旨在确定药用大麻患者用于管理驾驶受损风险的策略,以及影响这些策略使用的病因学因素。来自澳大利亚昆士兰州的药用大麻患者样本(N = 58)参加了定性访谈。专题分析显示,医用大麻患者采用了各种策略来减轻受损驾驶风险,尽管他们通常报告在最近使用大麻后开车。这些策略包括主观评估损害,等待特定的消费后时间段,管制大麻消费和驾驶行为,以及调整道路上的驾驶行为。对安全的认识、威慑机制、知识以及对驱动的权利和需要的认识都影响了所进行的风险管理的程度和类型。讨论了这些发现对政策、执法和未来围绕药用大麻和驾驶的研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of cyclists' cognitive workload through eye tracker and EEG sensors: Sensitivity to individual and external factors in a real-world experiment Who's in charge: Drivers or voice assistants? How power dynamics shape emotions and takeover behavior in automated driving Predictive role of empathic attention bias on driver traffic violations and the empathy-enhancing effects of intelligent driving companionship Active school travel and spatial cognition: exploring associations and moderating roles among children Why aren't electric vehicles taking over? Exploring the drivers and barriers to adoption: a systematic review, theoretical framework, and future directions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1