Human–environment interactions in the Lake Junín basin: Fire, megafauna, deforestation, and domestication, from the peopling of the Andes to the Inca Empire

IF 3.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL Quaternary Science Reviews Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-19 DOI:10.1016/j.quascirev.2024.109159
Erik J. Marsh , Kurt Rademaker
{"title":"Human–environment interactions in the Lake Junín basin: Fire, megafauna, deforestation, and domestication, from the peopling of the Andes to the Inca Empire","authors":"Erik J. Marsh ,&nbsp;Kurt Rademaker","doi":"10.1016/j.quascirev.2024.109159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Human–environment interactions are a focus of interdisciplinary research in the high Andes, recently invigorated by sediment-core data from Lake Junín (Chinchaycocha). On the basis of these records, recent articles have argued that humans arrived in the Junín basin 13 thousand calibrated years ago (kya), set large-scale fires, and hunted Pleistocene megafauna to extinction. Declines in montane tree pollen beginning ∼4 kya have been attributed to deforestation, camelid domestication, and agriculture on the high Andean puna. In this paper, we critically examine these arguments and contrast them with a compilation of archaeological data from the Lake Junín basin including 113 radiocarbon dates (12 unpublished), settlement patterns, camelid osteometry, macrobotanical remains, Inca period sites, and ethnographic and ethnohistoric descriptions of herding and farming. These data suggest that the earliest archaeological evidence for human occupation is not until ∼11 kya, and there is no clear evidence for interaction with Pleistocene megafauna. Although the Junín basin is often cited as a center for camelid domestication in the middle Holocene, this claim remains tenuous, since osteometry struggles to distinguish wild and domestic camelids. Finally, ethnohistoric and ethnographic information offer no support for the argument that the basin was a \"manufactured landscape\" in the late Holocene. Moving forward, we recommend more careful consideration of (1) the mismatch of temporal resolution in paleoecological and archaeological chronologies, (2) the potential spatial mismatch in the catchment area of palaeoecological proxies and archaeological datasets, and (3) ambiguity in <em>Sporormiella</em> as a proxy for fauna and charcoal as a proxy for human activity. We suggest that future work on paleoecological proxies from 0.7 to 0.3 kya could be harnessed to build a comparative baseline, since these centuries saw large populations of humans and domesticated camelids near the lake. Our goal is to promote more robust reconstructions of human–environment interactions in the Lake Junín basin and elsewhere.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20926,"journal":{"name":"Quaternary Science Reviews","volume":"351 ","pages":"Article 109159"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaternary Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379124006619","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human–environment interactions are a focus of interdisciplinary research in the high Andes, recently invigorated by sediment-core data from Lake Junín (Chinchaycocha). On the basis of these records, recent articles have argued that humans arrived in the Junín basin 13 thousand calibrated years ago (kya), set large-scale fires, and hunted Pleistocene megafauna to extinction. Declines in montane tree pollen beginning ∼4 kya have been attributed to deforestation, camelid domestication, and agriculture on the high Andean puna. In this paper, we critically examine these arguments and contrast them with a compilation of archaeological data from the Lake Junín basin including 113 radiocarbon dates (12 unpublished), settlement patterns, camelid osteometry, macrobotanical remains, Inca period sites, and ethnographic and ethnohistoric descriptions of herding and farming. These data suggest that the earliest archaeological evidence for human occupation is not until ∼11 kya, and there is no clear evidence for interaction with Pleistocene megafauna. Although the Junín basin is often cited as a center for camelid domestication in the middle Holocene, this claim remains tenuous, since osteometry struggles to distinguish wild and domestic camelids. Finally, ethnohistoric and ethnographic information offer no support for the argument that the basin was a "manufactured landscape" in the late Holocene. Moving forward, we recommend more careful consideration of (1) the mismatch of temporal resolution in paleoecological and archaeological chronologies, (2) the potential spatial mismatch in the catchment area of palaeoecological proxies and archaeological datasets, and (3) ambiguity in Sporormiella as a proxy for fauna and charcoal as a proxy for human activity. We suggest that future work on paleoecological proxies from 0.7 to 0.3 kya could be harnessed to build a comparative baseline, since these centuries saw large populations of humans and domesticated camelids near the lake. Our goal is to promote more robust reconstructions of human–environment interactions in the Lake Junín basin and elsewhere.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Junín湖流域人类与环境的相互作用:火、巨型动物、森林砍伐和驯化,从安第斯山脉的人类到印加帝国
人与环境的相互作用是高安第斯山脉跨学科研究的焦点,最近来自Junín湖(Chinchaycocha)的沉积物岩心数据使其活跃起来。在这些记录的基础上,最近的文章认为人类在13000校准年前(kya)到达Junín盆地,放火,捕杀更新世巨型动物直至灭绝。从4世纪开始,山地树木花粉的减少归因于安第斯高原的森林砍伐、骆驼驯化和农业。在本文中,我们对这些论点进行了批判性的研究,并将其与Junín湖流域的考古数据进行了对比,其中包括113个放射性碳测年(12个未发表)、定居模式、骆驼骨骼测量、大型植物遗迹、印加时期遗址,以及对放牧和农业的民族志和民族历史描述。这些数据表明,人类最早的考古证据直到11 kya才出现,并且没有与更新世巨型动物相互作用的明确证据。虽然Junín盆地经常被引用为全新世中期骆驼驯化的中心,但这种说法仍然站不住脚,因为骨测量难以区分野生和家养骆驼。最后,民族历史和民族志信息没有提供证据支持该盆地是全新世晚期“人造景观”的论点。展望未来,我们建议更仔细地考虑:(1)古生态年表和考古年表的时间分辨率不匹配;(2)古生态代用物和考古数据集在集水区的潜在空间不匹配;(3)孢菌作为动物代用物和木炭作为人类活动代用物的模糊性。我们建议,未来对0.7至0.3 kya的古生态代用物的研究可以用来建立一个比较基线,因为在这几个世纪里,湖泊附近有大量的人类种群和驯化的骆驼。我们的目标是促进Junín湖流域和其他地方人类与环境相互作用的更强大的重建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Quaternary Science Reviews
Quaternary Science Reviews 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
388
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Quaternary Science Reviews caters for all aspects of Quaternary science, and includes, for example, geology, geomorphology, geography, archaeology, soil science, palaeobotany, palaeontology, palaeoclimatology and the full range of applicable dating methods. The dividing line between what constitutes the review paper and one which contains new original data is not easy to establish, so QSR also publishes papers with new data especially if these perform a review function. All the Quaternary sciences are changing rapidly and subject to re-evaluation as the pace of discovery quickens; thus the diverse but comprehensive role of Quaternary Science Reviews keeps readers abreast of the wider issues relating to new developments in the field.
期刊最新文献
Transport of pollen from forests to the North American Arctic during the Holocene Contrasting provenance, fluxes and budgets for dissolved aluminium and barium in the Mediterranean; an integrating overview Deglaciation of Anticosti Island (eastern Canada) and its implications on climate-driven dynamics of the Laurentide Ice Sheet margin Middle Pleistocene to Holocene glacio-eustatic sequences of the Po Basin (Italy): Towards improved geological mapping of the Quaternary period Glaciation of the eastern Himalayas: Palaeoglacial and palaeoclimatic insights from the Dibang Valley, India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1