Human–environment interactions in the Lake Junín basin: Fire, megafauna, deforestation, and domestication, from the peopling of the Andes to the Inca Empire
{"title":"Human–environment interactions in the Lake Junín basin: Fire, megafauna, deforestation, and domestication, from the peopling of the Andes to the Inca Empire","authors":"Erik J. Marsh , Kurt Rademaker","doi":"10.1016/j.quascirev.2024.109159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Human–environment interactions are a focus of interdisciplinary research in the high Andes, recently invigorated by sediment-core data from Lake Junín (Chinchaycocha). On the basis of these records, recent articles have argued that humans arrived in the Junín basin 13 thousand calibrated years ago (kya), set large-scale fires, and hunted Pleistocene megafauna to extinction. Declines in montane tree pollen beginning ∼4 kya have been attributed to deforestation, camelid domestication, and agriculture on the high Andean puna. In this paper, we critically examine these arguments and contrast them with a compilation of archaeological data from the Lake Junín basin including 113 radiocarbon dates (12 unpublished), settlement patterns, camelid osteometry, macrobotanical remains, Inca period sites, and ethnographic and ethnohistoric descriptions of herding and farming. These data suggest that the earliest archaeological evidence for human occupation is not until ∼11 kya, and there is no clear evidence for interaction with Pleistocene megafauna. Although the Junín basin is often cited as a center for camelid domestication in the middle Holocene, this claim remains tenuous, since osteometry struggles to distinguish wild and domestic camelids. Finally, ethnohistoric and ethnographic information offer no support for the argument that the basin was a \"manufactured landscape\" in the late Holocene. Moving forward, we recommend more careful consideration of (1) the mismatch of temporal resolution in paleoecological and archaeological chronologies, (2) the potential spatial mismatch in the catchment area of palaeoecological proxies and archaeological datasets, and (3) ambiguity in <em>Sporormiella</em> as a proxy for fauna and charcoal as a proxy for human activity. We suggest that future work on paleoecological proxies from 0.7 to 0.3 kya could be harnessed to build a comparative baseline, since these centuries saw large populations of humans and domesticated camelids near the lake. Our goal is to promote more robust reconstructions of human–environment interactions in the Lake Junín basin and elsewhere.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20926,"journal":{"name":"Quaternary Science Reviews","volume":"351 ","pages":"Article 109159"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaternary Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379124006619","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Human–environment interactions are a focus of interdisciplinary research in the high Andes, recently invigorated by sediment-core data from Lake Junín (Chinchaycocha). On the basis of these records, recent articles have argued that humans arrived in the Junín basin 13 thousand calibrated years ago (kya), set large-scale fires, and hunted Pleistocene megafauna to extinction. Declines in montane tree pollen beginning ∼4 kya have been attributed to deforestation, camelid domestication, and agriculture on the high Andean puna. In this paper, we critically examine these arguments and contrast them with a compilation of archaeological data from the Lake Junín basin including 113 radiocarbon dates (12 unpublished), settlement patterns, camelid osteometry, macrobotanical remains, Inca period sites, and ethnographic and ethnohistoric descriptions of herding and farming. These data suggest that the earliest archaeological evidence for human occupation is not until ∼11 kya, and there is no clear evidence for interaction with Pleistocene megafauna. Although the Junín basin is often cited as a center for camelid domestication in the middle Holocene, this claim remains tenuous, since osteometry struggles to distinguish wild and domestic camelids. Finally, ethnohistoric and ethnographic information offer no support for the argument that the basin was a "manufactured landscape" in the late Holocene. Moving forward, we recommend more careful consideration of (1) the mismatch of temporal resolution in paleoecological and archaeological chronologies, (2) the potential spatial mismatch in the catchment area of palaeoecological proxies and archaeological datasets, and (3) ambiguity in Sporormiella as a proxy for fauna and charcoal as a proxy for human activity. We suggest that future work on paleoecological proxies from 0.7 to 0.3 kya could be harnessed to build a comparative baseline, since these centuries saw large populations of humans and domesticated camelids near the lake. Our goal is to promote more robust reconstructions of human–environment interactions in the Lake Junín basin and elsewhere.
期刊介绍:
Quaternary Science Reviews caters for all aspects of Quaternary science, and includes, for example, geology, geomorphology, geography, archaeology, soil science, palaeobotany, palaeontology, palaeoclimatology and the full range of applicable dating methods. The dividing line between what constitutes the review paper and one which contains new original data is not easy to establish, so QSR also publishes papers with new data especially if these perform a review function. All the Quaternary sciences are changing rapidly and subject to re-evaluation as the pace of discovery quickens; thus the diverse but comprehensive role of Quaternary Science Reviews keeps readers abreast of the wider issues relating to new developments in the field.