Adherence to prehospital thoracostomy practice guidelines for traumatic cardiac arrest: A retrospective study

IF 2.4 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation plus Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100870
Nicolas Beysard , Tara Agudo , Peter Serfozo , Tobias Zingg , Perrine Truong , Roland Albrecht , Vincent Darioli , Mathieu Pasquier
{"title":"Adherence to prehospital thoracostomy practice guidelines for traumatic cardiac arrest: A retrospective study","authors":"Nicolas Beysard ,&nbsp;Tara Agudo ,&nbsp;Peter Serfozo ,&nbsp;Tobias Zingg ,&nbsp;Perrine Truong ,&nbsp;Roland Albrecht ,&nbsp;Vincent Darioli ,&nbsp;Mathieu Pasquier","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The management of traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA) focuses on the immediate treatment of reversible causes, including bilateral thoracostomy. In our prehospital emergency service, bilateral thoracostomy has been recommended since 2012 for the management of TCA. We sought to analyse the prehospital management and clinical course of patients with TCA, focusing on changes over time in the use of thoracostomy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this single-centre retrospective observational study, we included patients with TCA managed by physicians of the prehospital service of Lausanne University Hospital from 2012 to 2024. The primary outcome was the annual rate of bilateral thoracostomy. Secondary outcomes included the rate of additional on-site measures, such as pelvic binder placement and airway management, and follow-up at 48 h.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 3206 cardiac arrests during the study period, 473 (15%) were TCAs. Among the 247 patients with resuscitation attempts, thoracostomy was judged as indicated in 223 (90%) and performed in 148 (66%). Twenty-seven (18%) patients who had a thoracostomy were alive on arrival at hospital, with 9 (6.1%) still alive at 48 h. The mean annual proportion of patients in whom a thoracostomy was performed was 68% (range 0–100%) and increased significantly over the years (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The annual rate of thoracostomy in TCA patients increased significantly in the period 2012 to 2024. Larger studies are required to determine the impact of thoracostomy on survival.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100870"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425000074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The management of traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA) focuses on the immediate treatment of reversible causes, including bilateral thoracostomy. In our prehospital emergency service, bilateral thoracostomy has been recommended since 2012 for the management of TCA. We sought to analyse the prehospital management and clinical course of patients with TCA, focusing on changes over time in the use of thoracostomy.

Methods

In this single-centre retrospective observational study, we included patients with TCA managed by physicians of the prehospital service of Lausanne University Hospital from 2012 to 2024. The primary outcome was the annual rate of bilateral thoracostomy. Secondary outcomes included the rate of additional on-site measures, such as pelvic binder placement and airway management, and follow-up at 48 h.

Results

Among 3206 cardiac arrests during the study period, 473 (15%) were TCAs. Among the 247 patients with resuscitation attempts, thoracostomy was judged as indicated in 223 (90%) and performed in 148 (66%). Twenty-seven (18%) patients who had a thoracostomy were alive on arrival at hospital, with 9 (6.1%) still alive at 48 h. The mean annual proportion of patients in whom a thoracostomy was performed was 68% (range 0–100%) and increased significantly over the years (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The annual rate of thoracostomy in TCA patients increased significantly in the period 2012 to 2024. Larger studies are required to determine the impact of thoracostomy on survival.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外伤性心脏骤停院前开胸手术指南的依从性:一项回顾性研究
目的外伤性心脏骤停(TCA)的处理重点是立即治疗可逆性原因,包括双侧开胸手术。在院前急诊服务中,自2012年以来,我们推荐双侧开胸术治疗TCA。我们试图分析院前处理和TCA患者的临床过程,重点关注开胸术使用随时间的变化。方法在这项单中心回顾性观察研究中,我们纳入了2012年至2024年由洛桑大学医院院前服务医师管理的TCA患者。主要观察指标为每年双侧开胸手术的发生率。次要结局包括额外现场措施的发生率,如盆腔捆绑剂放置和气道管理,以及48小时的随访。结果在研究期间的3206例心脏骤停中,473例(15%)为TCAs。在247例尝试复苏的患者中,223例(90%)被判定为适应证,148例(66%)进行了开胸手术。27例(18%)接受开胸手术的患者在到达医院时存活,9例(6.1%)在48小时时仍然存活。每年接受开胸手术的患者的平均比例为68%(范围0-100%),并且逐年显著增加(p <;0.001)。结论2012 - 2024年TCA患者每年开胸手术率明显上升。需要更大规模的研究来确定开胸手术对生存率的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
Young ERC Resuscitation Science Masterclass Journal Club article: the ARREST trial Preparedness deserts: a framework for understanding and addressing geographic inequities in bystander response to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Patient and arrest characteristics associated with rearrest and mortality following out of hospital cardiac arrest Characterization of external defibrillator output and its impact on defibrillation protection of medical equipment Corrective steps during neonatal mask ventilation – a narrative review of the evidence behind the MR SOPA acronym
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1