Regional technological profiles and collaborations: An empirical analysis of joint patents and EU-funded projects

IF 2.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Papers in Regional Science Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pirs.2024.100073
Diego D’Adda , Donato Iacobucci , Francesco Perugini
{"title":"Regional technological profiles and collaborations: An empirical analysis of joint patents and EU-funded projects","authors":"Diego D’Adda ,&nbsp;Donato Iacobucci ,&nbsp;Francesco Perugini","doi":"10.1016/j.pirs.2024.100073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aim of this paper is to determine the factors affecting technological collaborations among EU regions, focusing on the role of their technological profiles. We consider the population of EU NUTS2 regions and analyse the inter-regional collaborations in EPO patent applications and in EU projects in the Seventh Framework Programme in the period 2007–2013. We overcome the limitations related to the mono-dimensionality of technological proximity by explicitly considering the distinction between technological similarity and technological complementarity. We further distinguish between horizontal complementarity, related to the degree to which technologies are fruitfully combined in R&amp;D, and vertical complementarity, the degree to which technology developers (leaders) are related to technology adopters (followers). To measure ‘horizontal’ technology complementarity, we develop an original dyad-level indicator based on the concept of technological relatedness. The empirical analysis shows that technological complementarity has a statistically significant effect on the number of collaborations between regions, even when controlling for the degree of similarity. While horizontal complementarity positively affects only collaborations in EU projects, vertical complementarity negatively affects both joint patents and EU projects. Notwithstanding the relevance of complementarity, technological similarity seems to have a larger impact on the intensity of inter-regional collaboration. We also find dissimilarities in the factors affecting joint patents and EU projects due to the inner differences in the nature of these two types of innovative collaborations. The results are robust to different specifications and to the use of different methodologies for measuring similarity and complementarity. Given the rising interest in promoting technological inter-regional collaborations in the EU (e.g. in the Smart Specialisation Strategy), this paper provides novel insights about the determinants of two very different forms of inter-regional collaborations in innovation: joint patents and EU projects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51458,"journal":{"name":"Papers in Regional Science","volume":"104 1","pages":"Article 100073"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Papers in Regional Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056819024000939","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to determine the factors affecting technological collaborations among EU regions, focusing on the role of their technological profiles. We consider the population of EU NUTS2 regions and analyse the inter-regional collaborations in EPO patent applications and in EU projects in the Seventh Framework Programme in the period 2007–2013. We overcome the limitations related to the mono-dimensionality of technological proximity by explicitly considering the distinction between technological similarity and technological complementarity. We further distinguish between horizontal complementarity, related to the degree to which technologies are fruitfully combined in R&D, and vertical complementarity, the degree to which technology developers (leaders) are related to technology adopters (followers). To measure ‘horizontal’ technology complementarity, we develop an original dyad-level indicator based on the concept of technological relatedness. The empirical analysis shows that technological complementarity has a statistically significant effect on the number of collaborations between regions, even when controlling for the degree of similarity. While horizontal complementarity positively affects only collaborations in EU projects, vertical complementarity negatively affects both joint patents and EU projects. Notwithstanding the relevance of complementarity, technological similarity seems to have a larger impact on the intensity of inter-regional collaboration. We also find dissimilarities in the factors affecting joint patents and EU projects due to the inner differences in the nature of these two types of innovative collaborations. The results are robust to different specifications and to the use of different methodologies for measuring similarity and complementarity. Given the rising interest in promoting technological inter-regional collaborations in the EU (e.g. in the Smart Specialisation Strategy), this paper provides novel insights about the determinants of two very different forms of inter-regional collaborations in innovation: joint patents and EU projects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
区域技术概况和合作:联合专利和欧盟资助项目的实证分析
本文的目的是确定影响欧盟地区之间技术合作的因素,重点是他们的技术概况的作用。我们考虑了欧盟NUTS2地区的人口,并分析了2007-2013年期间EPO专利申请和欧盟第七框架计划项目的区域间合作。我们通过明确考虑技术相似性和技术互补性之间的区别,克服了与技术接近性单维性相关的局限性。我们进一步区分了水平互补性和垂直互补性,水平互补性与技术在研发中有效结合的程度有关,垂直互补性与技术开发人员(领导者)与技术采用者(追随者)的关系程度有关。为了衡量“水平”技术互补性,我们基于技术相关性的概念开发了一个原始的二元水平指标。实证分析表明,即使在控制相似程度的情况下,技术互补性对区域间合作的数量也有统计学上显著的影响。横向互补性只对欧盟项目的合作产生积极影响,而纵向互补性对联合专利和欧盟项目都产生消极影响。尽管互补性具有相关性,但技术相似性似乎对区域间合作的强度有更大的影响。我们还发现,由于两种类型的创新合作性质的内在差异,影响联合专利和欧盟项目的因素也存在差异。结果对于不同的规范和使用不同的方法来测量相似性和互补性是稳健的。鉴于对促进欧盟区域间技术合作的兴趣日益浓厚(例如在智能专业化战略中),本文提供了关于两种截然不同形式的区域间创新合作的决定因素的新颖见解:联合专利和欧盟项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Regional Science is the official journal of the Regional Science Association International. It encourages high quality scholarship on a broad range of topics in the field of regional science. These topics include, but are not limited to, behavioral modeling of location, transportation, and migration decisions, land use and urban development, interindustry analysis, environmental and ecological analysis, resource management, urban and regional policy analysis, geographical information systems, and spatial statistics. The journal publishes papers that make a new contribution to the theory, methods and models related to urban and regional (or spatial) matters.
期刊最新文献
Do more transport opportunities lead to higher income? The effects of public transit access on transit-adjacent neighborhoods Green attitudes and interregional migration intentions: Evidence from the EU Decoding regional dynamics: Institutions, innovation, and regional development in the EU The role of the technological capacity of regional partners on technological branching Migration and local innovation: Evidence from fine-grained data from OECD countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1