Recreational Marijuana Laws and suicide deaths in the US

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Psychiatry Research Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2025.116386
Nawar Nayeem , Erick Messias , Ping-I Lin
{"title":"Recreational Marijuana Laws and suicide deaths in the US","authors":"Nawar Nayeem ,&nbsp;Erick Messias ,&nbsp;Ping-I Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.psychres.2025.116386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to examine the association between Recreational Marijuana Laws (RMLs) and age-adjusted suicide rates in the U.S. population from 2000 to 2022.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Suicide rate data were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Multiple Cause of Death Files at the state and year level. Information on RML status and years of legalization was sourced from the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML). Using a staggered difference-in-differences (DiD) framework, we assessed the relationship between RMLs and age-adjusted suicide rates.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>RMLs were associated with an increase of 0.68 suicide deaths per 100,000 population (p-value &lt; 0.05). This increase was primarily driven by states that implemented RMLs in 2018 (Maine, Vermont, and Michigan) and 2019 (Illinois). In contrast, states that enacted RMLs in 2015 (Alaska, Oregon, and Washington, D.C.) experienced a decline in suicide deaths post-legalization.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study adds to the growing body of literature on RMLs and suicidality by underscoring the potential role of state-specific factors—such as demographic characteristics, implementation strategies, or contextual differences—in shaping the direction and magnitude of this association. These findings highlight the need for further research to better understand the mechanisms underlying these divergent outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20819,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Research","volume":"345 ","pages":"Article 116386"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165178125000356","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to examine the association between Recreational Marijuana Laws (RMLs) and age-adjusted suicide rates in the U.S. population from 2000 to 2022.

Methods

Suicide rate data were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Multiple Cause of Death Files at the state and year level. Information on RML status and years of legalization was sourced from the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML). Using a staggered difference-in-differences (DiD) framework, we assessed the relationship between RMLs and age-adjusted suicide rates.

Results

RMLs were associated with an increase of 0.68 suicide deaths per 100,000 population (p-value < 0.05). This increase was primarily driven by states that implemented RMLs in 2018 (Maine, Vermont, and Michigan) and 2019 (Illinois). In contrast, states that enacted RMLs in 2015 (Alaska, Oregon, and Washington, D.C.) experienced a decline in suicide deaths post-legalization.

Conclusion

This study adds to the growing body of literature on RMLs and suicidality by underscoring the potential role of state-specific factors—such as demographic characteristics, implementation strategies, or contextual differences—in shaping the direction and magnitude of this association. These findings highlight the need for further research to better understand the mechanisms underlying these divergent outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国娱乐性大麻法和自杀死亡
本研究旨在研究2000年至2022年美国人口中娱乐性大麻法律(RMLs)与年龄调整自杀率之间的关系。方法自杀率数据来自美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的各州和年度多重死因档案。有关RML状态和合法化年份的信息来自全国大麻法律改革组织(NORML)。使用交错差中差(DiD)框架,我们评估了rml与年龄调整自杀率之间的关系。结果rmls与每10万人中自杀死亡人数增加0.68人相关(p值<;0.05)。这一增长主要是由2018年(缅因州、佛蒙特州和密歇根州)和2019年(伊利诺伊州)实施rml的州推动的。相比之下,在2015年实施RMLs的州(阿拉斯加、俄勒冈和华盛顿特区),合法化后自杀死亡人数有所下降。结论:本研究增加了越来越多的关于rml和自杀的文献,强调了特定国家因素的潜在作用,如人口特征、实施策略或背景差异,在形成这种关联的方向和程度方面。这些发现强调了进一步研究以更好地理解这些不同结果背后的机制的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatry Research
Psychiatry Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
527
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Psychiatry Research offers swift publication of comprehensive research reports and reviews within the field of psychiatry. The scope of the journal encompasses: Biochemical, physiological, neuroanatomic, genetic, neurocognitive, and psychosocial determinants of psychiatric disorders. Diagnostic assessments of psychiatric disorders. Evaluations that pursue hypotheses about the cause or causes of psychiatric diseases. Evaluations of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic psychiatric treatments. Basic neuroscience studies related to animal or neurochemical models for psychiatric disorders. Methodological advances, such as instrumentation, clinical scales, and assays directly applicable to psychiatric research.
期刊最新文献
Neurotransmitter dysregulation in depression, anxiety, and suicidality: From synaptic dysfunction to cellular pathogenesis Prescription opioid use and 12-month depression trajectories Coping efficacy as a mediator between combat exposure events and probable PTSD The subjective trauma outlook as a screening tool for PTSD during wartime: extension to the PCL-5 short form Acute and long-term psychiatric consequences of synthetic cannabinoids and related novel psychoactive substances: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1