Investigating the motivations of repetitive barrier interactions in Pogona vitticeps

IF 2 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Applied Animal Behaviour Science Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.applanim.2024.106484
Melanie Denommé, Glenn J. Tattersall
{"title":"Investigating the motivations of repetitive barrier interactions in Pogona vitticeps","authors":"Melanie Denommé,&nbsp;Glenn J. Tattersall","doi":"10.1016/j.applanim.2024.106484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Considerable research has demonstrated that the effective management of repetitive behaviours such as bar-biting and pacing relies upon understanding their motivations; however, this same research has revealed that repetitive behaviours can have a diverse array of motivations. In reptiles, repetitive behaviours commonly manifest as persistent interactions with the barriers of the enclosure (hereafter IWB). It is typically assumed that IWB indicates a motivation to escape the enclosure, but this has not been investigated; consequently, this assumption is the hypothesis of this article. Two predictions followed from this: IWB should be biased towards known and visible escape routes and should be associated with other factors that may increase a lizards’ motivation to escape. We found that within their enclosures, lizards performed IWB for longer on the only known escape route. Furthermore, when this area was made partially opaque, IWB was biased towards the remaining transparent portion. However, the association of IWB with other factors was less clear. IWB was strongly associated with defecation, but the cause-and-effect of this relationship was unclear. In addition, IWB was not associated with feeding, although this may be related to the generally sedentary life histories of <em>P. vitticeps</em>. Finally, female lizards performed more IWB than males during the breeding season, but the opposite was predicted based on the movement patterns of wild <em>P. vitticeps</em>; this may reflect that IWB is related to the motivation to gain certain resources, but not necessarily to be active. In conclusion, there was evidence that IWB was related to a motivation to escape the enclosure, but as with other research, we found that IWB had diverse motivations that are linked to the animal’s life history.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8222,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","volume":"283 ","pages":"Article 106484"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159124003320","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Considerable research has demonstrated that the effective management of repetitive behaviours such as bar-biting and pacing relies upon understanding their motivations; however, this same research has revealed that repetitive behaviours can have a diverse array of motivations. In reptiles, repetitive behaviours commonly manifest as persistent interactions with the barriers of the enclosure (hereafter IWB). It is typically assumed that IWB indicates a motivation to escape the enclosure, but this has not been investigated; consequently, this assumption is the hypothesis of this article. Two predictions followed from this: IWB should be biased towards known and visible escape routes and should be associated with other factors that may increase a lizards’ motivation to escape. We found that within their enclosures, lizards performed IWB for longer on the only known escape route. Furthermore, when this area was made partially opaque, IWB was biased towards the remaining transparent portion. However, the association of IWB with other factors was less clear. IWB was strongly associated with defecation, but the cause-and-effect of this relationship was unclear. In addition, IWB was not associated with feeding, although this may be related to the generally sedentary life histories of P. vitticeps. Finally, female lizards performed more IWB than males during the breeding season, but the opposite was predicted based on the movement patterns of wild P. vitticeps; this may reflect that IWB is related to the motivation to gain certain resources, but not necessarily to be active. In conclusion, there was evidence that IWB was related to a motivation to escape the enclosure, but as with other research, we found that IWB had diverse motivations that are linked to the animal’s life history.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究玻璃钢中重复屏障相互作用的动机
大量研究表明,有效管理重复行为(如咬杠和踱步)依赖于理解它们的动机;然而,同样的研究表明,重复行为可能有多种动机。在爬行动物中,重复性行为通常表现为与围栏的持续相互作用(以下简称IWB)。通常假设IWB表明有逃离围栏的动机,但尚未对此进行调查;因此,这个假设就是本文的假设。由此产生了两个预测:IWB应该偏向于已知和可见的逃跑路线,并且应该与其他可能增加蜥蜴逃跑动机的因素相关联。我们发现,在它们的围栏内,蜥蜴在唯一已知的逃生路线上进行IWB的时间更长。此外,当该区域部分不透明时,IWB偏向剩余的透明部分。然而,IWB与其他因素的关系尚不清楚。IWB与排便密切相关,但这种关系的因果关系尚不清楚。此外,IWB与摄食无关,尽管这可能与葡萄斑拟虫一般久坐的生活史有关。最后,雌性蜥蜴在繁殖季节比雄性蜥蜴表现出更多的IWB行为,但根据野生葡萄斑蜥的运动模式预测的结果相反;这可能反映出IWB与获得某些资源的动机有关,但不一定是积极的动机。总之,有证据表明,IWB与逃离围栏的动机有关,但与其他研究一样,我们发现IWB有多种动机,这些动机与动物的生活史有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Applied Animal Behaviour Science 农林科学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
21.70%
发文量
191
审稿时长
18.1 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal publishes relevant information on the behaviour of domesticated and utilized animals. Topics covered include: -Behaviour of farm, zoo and laboratory animals in relation to animal management and welfare -Behaviour of companion animals in relation to behavioural problems, for example, in relation to the training of dogs for different purposes, in relation to behavioural problems -Studies of the behaviour of wild animals when these studies are relevant from an applied perspective, for example in relation to wildlife management, pest management or nature conservation -Methodological studies within relevant fields The principal subjects are farm, companion and laboratory animals, including, of course, poultry. The journal also deals with the following animal subjects: -Those involved in any farming system, e.g. deer, rabbits and fur-bearing animals -Those in ANY form of confinement, e.g. zoos, safari parks and other forms of display -Feral animals, and any animal species which impinge on farming operations, e.g. as causes of loss or damage -Species used for hunting, recreation etc. may also be considered as acceptable subjects in some instances -Laboratory animals, if the material relates to their behavioural requirements
期刊最新文献
Identification of facial expressions in response to rewarding stimuli in dogs Program animal welfare: A scoping review of animal interaction programs and their welfare impact on zoo-housed animals Behavioural and faecal cortisol metabolite monitoring of harbour (Phoca vitulina) and grey seal pups (Halichoerus grypus) in rehabilitation centres Editorial Board Highlights of published papers in Applied Animal Behaviour Science in 2025
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1