Relationship between crack initiation stress and uniaxial compressive strength of brittle rocks

IF 5.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 MECHANICS Engineering Fracture Mechanics Pub Date : 2025-02-07 Epub Date: 2024-12-25 DOI:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110768
Baicun Yang , Chuyang Song , Yongting Duan , Zihan Zhao
{"title":"Relationship between crack initiation stress and uniaxial compressive strength of brittle rocks","authors":"Baicun Yang ,&nbsp;Chuyang Song ,&nbsp;Yongting Duan ,&nbsp;Zihan Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Clarifying the reasonable value range of the stress threshold for brittle rock under uniaxial compression has high theoretical and practical significance for predicting the failure of an engineering rock mass. Although much attention has been directed toward the experimental investigation of the ratio of crack initiation stress to uniaxial compressive strength (CI/UCS) in recent years, the ratio’s reasonable value range has not be accurately obtained owing to the lack of relevant theoretical work. By combining renormalization group theory, a rock damage constitutive model, and a CI identification method, this study derived the theoretical expression of CI/UCS for brittle rock and calculated the reasonable value range of CI/UCS as 0.43–0.52. The value range of CI/UCS was verified by 8 experimental results obtained for Longmaxi shale with different bedding angles, and the results of previous experiments on 385 brittle rocks with different lithologies obtained from different locations. On this basis, the main factors affecting CI/UCS in brittle rocks were analyzed, and the applicability of the theoretical calculation results was discussed. The relevant research results are of great interest to theoretical research on the rock stress threshold and can be useful as guidelines in engineering practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11576,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","volume":"314 ","pages":"Article 110768"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013794424009317","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clarifying the reasonable value range of the stress threshold for brittle rock under uniaxial compression has high theoretical and practical significance for predicting the failure of an engineering rock mass. Although much attention has been directed toward the experimental investigation of the ratio of crack initiation stress to uniaxial compressive strength (CI/UCS) in recent years, the ratio’s reasonable value range has not be accurately obtained owing to the lack of relevant theoretical work. By combining renormalization group theory, a rock damage constitutive model, and a CI identification method, this study derived the theoretical expression of CI/UCS for brittle rock and calculated the reasonable value range of CI/UCS as 0.43–0.52. The value range of CI/UCS was verified by 8 experimental results obtained for Longmaxi shale with different bedding angles, and the results of previous experiments on 385 brittle rocks with different lithologies obtained from different locations. On this basis, the main factors affecting CI/UCS in brittle rocks were analyzed, and the applicability of the theoretical calculation results was discussed. The relevant research results are of great interest to theoretical research on the rock stress threshold and can be useful as guidelines in engineering practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脆性岩石裂纹起裂应力与单轴抗压强度的关系
明确脆性岩石单轴压缩应力阈值的合理取值范围,对工程岩体的破坏预测具有重要的理论和现实意义。虽然近年来对裂纹起裂应力与单轴抗压强度之比(CI/UCS)进行了大量的实验研究,但由于缺乏相关的理论工作,该比值的合理取值范围尚未得到准确的计算。结合重整化群理论、岩石损伤本构模型和CI识别方法,推导了脆性岩石CI/UCS的理论表达式,并计算出CI/UCS的合理取值范围为0.43 ~ 0.52。CI/UCS的取值范围通过对龙马溪页岩不同层理角度的8个实验结果,以及前人对不同地点385种不同岩性脆性岩的实验结果进行验证。在此基础上,分析了影响脆性岩石CI/UCS的主要因素,并讨论了理论计算结果的适用性。相关研究成果对岩石应力阈值的理论研究具有重要意义,对工程实践具有指导意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
606
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: EFM covers a broad range of topics in fracture mechanics to be of interest and use to both researchers and practitioners. Contributions are welcome which address the fracture behavior of conventional engineering material systems as well as newly emerging material systems. Contributions on developments in the areas of mechanics and materials science strongly related to fracture mechanics are also welcome. Papers on fatigue are welcome if they treat the fatigue process using the methods of fracture mechanics.
期刊最新文献
A unified approach for predicting dynamic plasticity and ductile fracture of 6005 aluminum alloy Complete stress-strain behaviour and limit state in micromechanical anisotropic damage model with microcrack kinking under compression The phase-field model of fracture incorporating Mohr–Coulomb, Mogi–Coulomb, and Hoek–Brown strength surfaces Tailoring interstitial matrix properties for toughness improvement of concrete based on ductile cementitious matrix A 3D peridynamic framework for fracture analysis of heterogeneous materials with random aggregates: application to polymer-cemented crushed stone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1