Analysis of sensitivity factors on CJB mechanical behavior from specimen scale to engineering scale

IF 5.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 MECHANICS Engineering Fracture Mechanics Pub Date : 2025-02-07 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110673
Bin Gong , Yongyi Wang , Xu Chen , Wencheng Song , Kaikai Wang , Jiang Yu
{"title":"Analysis of sensitivity factors on CJB mechanical behavior from specimen scale to engineering scale","authors":"Bin Gong ,&nbsp;Yongyi Wang ,&nbsp;Xu Chen ,&nbsp;Wencheng Song ,&nbsp;Kaikai Wang ,&nbsp;Jiang Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The mechanical behaviors of columnar jointed basalts (CJBs) are affected by various sensitivity factors and show significant cross-scale differences. Employing the representative models ranging from individual CJB specimens to tunnels, the sensitivity factors including joint mechanical characteristics, mesoscopic rock constitutive relations, and model boundaries are meticulously considered. Combined with digital image correlation, these models are rigorously tested against the <em>meso</em>-damage mechanics, statistical strength theory, and continuum mechanics. Subsequently, a comprehensive examination ensues, delving into the spectrum of influencing factors, fracture mechanisms, and sensitivity analyses of CJBs. Notably, it emerges that the mechanical anisotropy of CJB specimens is most susceptible to boundary condition, while joint mechanical property is more sensitive than mesoscopic rock constitutive relation. Furthermore, the specimen height-width ratio exhibits relative insensitivity, whereas the excavation stage is relatively sensitive for CJB tunnel. The proportional distance of subsidiary joint set manifests a lesser impact compared to the other parameters. Besides, from specimen scale to tunnel scale, the sensitive factor rankings on the mechanical behavior of related models are summarized. These achievements not only enhance our understanding of cross-scale CJB mechanics but also provide crucial knowledge for experimental setup, engineering design, and lifecycle management of CJB-involved projects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11576,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","volume":"314 ","pages":"Article 110673"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013794424008361","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The mechanical behaviors of columnar jointed basalts (CJBs) are affected by various sensitivity factors and show significant cross-scale differences. Employing the representative models ranging from individual CJB specimens to tunnels, the sensitivity factors including joint mechanical characteristics, mesoscopic rock constitutive relations, and model boundaries are meticulously considered. Combined with digital image correlation, these models are rigorously tested against the meso-damage mechanics, statistical strength theory, and continuum mechanics. Subsequently, a comprehensive examination ensues, delving into the spectrum of influencing factors, fracture mechanisms, and sensitivity analyses of CJBs. Notably, it emerges that the mechanical anisotropy of CJB specimens is most susceptible to boundary condition, while joint mechanical property is more sensitive than mesoscopic rock constitutive relation. Furthermore, the specimen height-width ratio exhibits relative insensitivity, whereas the excavation stage is relatively sensitive for CJB tunnel. The proportional distance of subsidiary joint set manifests a lesser impact compared to the other parameters. Besides, from specimen scale to tunnel scale, the sensitive factor rankings on the mechanical behavior of related models are summarized. These achievements not only enhance our understanding of cross-scale CJB mechanics but also provide crucial knowledge for experimental setup, engineering design, and lifecycle management of CJB-involved projects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从试件尺度到工程尺度对CJB力学行为的敏感因素分析
柱状节理玄武岩的力学行为受多种敏感因子的影响,并表现出显著的跨尺度差异。采用从CJB个体试件到隧道的代表性模型,仔细考虑了节理力学特性、细观岩石本构关系和模型边界等敏感因素。结合数字图像相关,这些模型经过了细观损伤力学、统计强度理论和连续介质力学的严格测试。随后,进行了全面的检查,深入研究了CJBs的影响因素、断裂机制和敏感性分析。值得注意的是,CJB试样的力学各向异性最容易受到边界条件的影响,而节理力学特性比细观岩石本构关系更为敏感。试件高宽比相对不敏感,而开挖阶段对CJB隧道相对敏感。与其他参数相比,副节理组比例距离的影响较小。从试件尺度到隧道尺度,总结了影响相关模型力学行为的敏感因素排序。这些成果不仅增强了我们对CJB跨尺度力学的理解,而且为CJB项目的实验设置、工程设计和生命周期管理提供了重要的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
606
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: EFM covers a broad range of topics in fracture mechanics to be of interest and use to both researchers and practitioners. Contributions are welcome which address the fracture behavior of conventional engineering material systems as well as newly emerging material systems. Contributions on developments in the areas of mechanics and materials science strongly related to fracture mechanics are also welcome. Papers on fatigue are welcome if they treat the fatigue process using the methods of fracture mechanics.
期刊最新文献
Fracture analysis of mode III interface cracks in ultra-thin layered composite materials: theory and MATLAB code A new estimation of median crack length in scratching of brittle materials On the 1D homogeneous and localized solutions of variational phase field method for pressurized fracture Higher-order electromechanical fracture analysis: Single- and mixed-mode nanocracks in flexoelectric solids Experimental study on the effect of bending stress on rail RCF crack initiation and propagation behavior: Based on a newly designed rail specimen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1