The local government project: A matchmaker or a troublemaker?

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT International Journal of Project Management Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102674
Grete Hagebakken, Trude Høgvold Olsen, Elsa Solstad
{"title":"The local government project: A matchmaker or a troublemaker?","authors":"Grete Hagebakken,&nbsp;Trude Høgvold Olsen,&nbsp;Elsa Solstad","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Several studies have focused on local government as project-supported organisations (PSOs) initiating projects aiming to solve non-routine activities, but we know less about the widespread practice of initiating projects to solve recurrent problems in daily operations. This paper reports findings from a qualitative, longitudinal study of how a project team in a Norwegian local authority navigated tensions in their efforts to solve a daily operations challenge. Our findings contribute to the recent debate about consequences of projects in PSOs. First, we argue that tensions in PSOs can be theorised as competition between co-existing institutional logics and understood in light of strategic owner capabilities. Further, we suggest that the perceived strength of tensions influences whether the project is interpreted as a matchmaker between different logics, or, at other times, as a troublemaker where the project team's interpretation of contextual complexity limits its ability to combine co-existing institutional logics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"43 1","pages":"Article 102674"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Project Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786325000018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several studies have focused on local government as project-supported organisations (PSOs) initiating projects aiming to solve non-routine activities, but we know less about the widespread practice of initiating projects to solve recurrent problems in daily operations. This paper reports findings from a qualitative, longitudinal study of how a project team in a Norwegian local authority navigated tensions in their efforts to solve a daily operations challenge. Our findings contribute to the recent debate about consequences of projects in PSOs. First, we argue that tensions in PSOs can be theorised as competition between co-existing institutional logics and understood in light of strategic owner capabilities. Further, we suggest that the perceived strength of tensions influences whether the project is interpreted as a matchmaker between different logics, or, at other times, as a troublemaker where the project team's interpretation of contextual complexity limits its ability to combine co-existing institutional logics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地方政府项目:媒人还是麻烦制造者?
一些研究关注地方政府作为项目支持组织(pso)发起旨在解决非常规活动的项目,但我们对发起项目以解决日常运营中反复出现的问题的广泛实践知之甚少。本文报告了一项定性、纵向研究的结果,研究了挪威地方当局的一个项目团队如何在努力解决日常运营挑战的过程中应对紧张局势。我们的发现有助于最近关于pso项目后果的辩论。首先,我们认为pso中的紧张关系可以理论化为共存的制度逻辑之间的竞争,并根据战略所有者能力来理解。此外,我们认为,紧张关系的感知强度会影响项目是否被解释为不同逻辑之间的中间人,或者,在其他时候,作为麻烦制造者,项目团队对上下文复杂性的解释限制了其结合共存制度逻辑的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
26.20%
发文量
83
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Project Management is recognized as a premier publication in the field of project management and organization studies. Our main objective is to contribute to the advancement of project management and project organizing through the publication of groundbreaking research. We are dedicated to presenting fresh insights and new knowledge in various domains, including project management, program management, portfolio management, project-oriented organizations, project networks, and project-oriented societies. We actively encourage submissions that explore project management and organizing from the perspectives of organizational behavior, strategy, supply chain management, technology, change management, innovation, and sustainability. By publishing high-quality research articles and reviews, we strive to revolutionize the academic landscape and propel the field of project management forward. We invite researchers, scholars, and practitioners to contribute to our journal and be a part of the progressive development in this exciting field.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Taming time: How inclusive leadership mitigates temporal conflict and time stress in IT projects Leveraging generative AI for project management: The role of mindfulness and job crafting Inter-team knowledge collaboration across boundaries in multi-team consulting projects Revisiting collaboration dilemmas among stakeholders in digital projects: A transaction cost lens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1