The forgotten factor: Exploring consumer perceptions of artificial intelligence in the food and agriculture systems

IF 7.2 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Future Foods Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1016/j.fufo.2025.100553
Cheng-Xian Yang, Lauri M. Baker, Anissa Mattox, David Diehl, Sydney Honeycutt
{"title":"The forgotten factor: Exploring consumer perceptions of artificial intelligence in the food and agriculture systems","authors":"Cheng-Xian Yang,&nbsp;Lauri M. Baker,&nbsp;Anissa Mattox,&nbsp;David Diehl,&nbsp;Sydney Honeycutt","doi":"10.1016/j.fufo.2025.100553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) offers potential solutions to optimize agricultural production and sustainability. This study examined American perceptions and attitudes toward AI applications in the food and agriculture systems, assessing both public optimism and concerns. Using a mixed-methods approach grounded in online ethnography and survey analysis, we identified five primary themes influencing public support for AI in agriculture: Knowledge of AI in agriculture, trust in scientific experts in agriculture and food production, concerns about using AI in agriculture, health concerns about agriculture and food production, and general attitudes toward AI technology itself. Findings indicated moderate public knowledge about AI's agricultural applications, with higher support correlating with trust in agricultural scientists and awareness of health benefits linked to AI innovations. Conversely, concerns over privacy, data security, and potential job displacement contribute to hesitancy. Our regression model further highlights the significance of these themes with demographic factors. This study indicated the need for AI stakeholders to address knowledge gaps and ethical considerations, emphasizing transparent data practices and clear communication of AI in enhancing agricultural sustainability. These insights offer valuable directions for future research and policy-making, promoting a balanced approach to integrating AI in agriculture that is responsive to public sentiment and ethical standards.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34474,"journal":{"name":"Future Foods","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100553"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Foods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666833525000164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) offers potential solutions to optimize agricultural production and sustainability. This study examined American perceptions and attitudes toward AI applications in the food and agriculture systems, assessing both public optimism and concerns. Using a mixed-methods approach grounded in online ethnography and survey analysis, we identified five primary themes influencing public support for AI in agriculture: Knowledge of AI in agriculture, trust in scientific experts in agriculture and food production, concerns about using AI in agriculture, health concerns about agriculture and food production, and general attitudes toward AI technology itself. Findings indicated moderate public knowledge about AI's agricultural applications, with higher support correlating with trust in agricultural scientists and awareness of health benefits linked to AI innovations. Conversely, concerns over privacy, data security, and potential job displacement contribute to hesitancy. Our regression model further highlights the significance of these themes with demographic factors. This study indicated the need for AI stakeholders to address knowledge gaps and ethical considerations, emphasizing transparent data practices and clear communication of AI in enhancing agricultural sustainability. These insights offer valuable directions for future research and policy-making, promoting a balanced approach to integrating AI in agriculture that is responsive to public sentiment and ethical standards.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Future Foods
Future Foods Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Foods is a specialized journal that is dedicated to tackling the challenges posed by climate change and the need for sustainability in the realm of food production. The journal recognizes the imperative to transform current food manufacturing and consumption practices to meet the dietary needs of a burgeoning global population while simultaneously curbing environmental degradation. The mission of Future Foods is to disseminate research that aligns with the goal of fostering the development of innovative technologies and alternative food sources to establish more sustainable food systems. The journal is committed to publishing high-quality, peer-reviewed articles that contribute to the advancement of sustainable food practices. Abstracting and indexing: Scopus Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) SNIP
期刊最新文献
Structural characterization and rheological analysis of Lentinus edodes mycelium (mycoprotein)–hydrocolloid composites for food formulation Effect of cardanol on the physical and chemical properties of sodium caseinate-coated papers for packaging applications Effect of longan (Dimocarpus longan Lour.) flower aqueous extract on noodle products Comparative study of packaging materials developed from fish and legume protein concentrates Red dragon fruit (Hylocereus polyrhizus), a superfruit rich in betacyanins pigments with antioxidative potential for hepatoprotection: A review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1