Impacto del uso de redes sociales en las gestantes del área norte de Madrid

IF 0.1 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Clinica e Investigacion en Ginecologia y Obstetricia Pub Date : 2025-01-11 DOI:10.1016/j.gine.2024.101030
N. Mateos-Canals, S. Ruiz-Martínez, N. Martínez Sánchez, J.L. Bartha Rasero, M.C. Fernández-Miranda
{"title":"Impacto del uso de redes sociales en las gestantes del área norte de Madrid","authors":"N. Mateos-Canals,&nbsp;S. Ruiz-Martínez,&nbsp;N. Martínez Sánchez,&nbsp;J.L. Bartha Rasero,&nbsp;M.C. Fernández-Miranda","doi":"10.1016/j.gine.2024.101030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the use of social media (SM) and its impact on pregnant women in the northern area of Madrid, Spain.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>An anonymous survey was conducted with 231 pregnant women who were monitored in the Obstetrics Service of La Paz University Hospital (Madrid). The use of various SM platforms and the information sought were evaluated, as well as the perceived credibility, influence on attitudes, and effects on perceived anxiety following their use.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>97% of pregnant women used SM, with 83.5% using it daily. Usage was higher among younger age groups, with Instagram being the most used SM platform. 81.7% of them followed profiles related to obstetrics/perinatal care, but one in five was unaware of the professionalism of the person behind the profile. Information about pregnancy, childbirth, neonatal care, and breastfeeding were the most sought-after topics, with an increase in the search for breastfeeding information among younger women. 45.4% considered the information to be highly credible, and 49.3% believed it could moderately influence their attitudes. Finally, 47.4% reported feeling moderately calm with the information, and 51.2% experienced low levels of anxiety.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The use of SM among pregnant women reflects that of the general population, with Instagram being the most popular platform. Many patients seek medical information on SM but often verify it with healthcare professionals. The credibility of information on SM varies, having a moderate influence on attitudes and perceived anxiety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":41294,"journal":{"name":"Clinica e Investigacion en Ginecologia y Obstetricia","volume":"52 2","pages":"Article 101030"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica e Investigacion en Ginecologia y Obstetricia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210573X24000935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the use of social media (SM) and its impact on pregnant women in the northern area of Madrid, Spain.

Method

An anonymous survey was conducted with 231 pregnant women who were monitored in the Obstetrics Service of La Paz University Hospital (Madrid). The use of various SM platforms and the information sought were evaluated, as well as the perceived credibility, influence on attitudes, and effects on perceived anxiety following their use.

Results

97% of pregnant women used SM, with 83.5% using it daily. Usage was higher among younger age groups, with Instagram being the most used SM platform. 81.7% of them followed profiles related to obstetrics/perinatal care, but one in five was unaware of the professionalism of the person behind the profile. Information about pregnancy, childbirth, neonatal care, and breastfeeding were the most sought-after topics, with an increase in the search for breastfeeding information among younger women. 45.4% considered the information to be highly credible, and 49.3% believed it could moderately influence their attitudes. Finally, 47.4% reported feeling moderately calm with the information, and 51.2% experienced low levels of anxiety.

Conclusions

The use of SM among pregnant women reflects that of the general population, with Instagram being the most popular platform. Many patients seek medical information on SM but often verify it with healthcare professionals. The credibility of information on SM varies, having a moderate influence on attitudes and perceived anxiety.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: Una excelente publicación para mantenerse al día en los temas de máximo interés de la ginecología de vanguardia. Resulta idónea tanto para el especialista en ginecología, como en obstetricia o en pediatría, y está presente en los más prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
期刊最新文献
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the ultrasound diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse (MUDPOP) Impacto del uso de redes sociales en las gestantes del área norte de Madrid Women empowerment and its impact on fertility Uso de plasma rico en plaquetas en el campo de la reproducción humana asistida Bases fisiológicas, técnicas y principales indicaciones de preservación de la fertilidad en la paciente oncológica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1