The public radiological risk assessment for a generic HPR1000 in China

IF 2.1 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Nuclear Engineering and Design Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113779
Mengxi Wang , Hongtao Lin , Liang Long , Xinjian Liu , Na Xue
{"title":"The public radiological risk assessment for a generic HPR1000 in China","authors":"Mengxi Wang ,&nbsp;Hongtao Lin ,&nbsp;Liang Long ,&nbsp;Xinjian Liu ,&nbsp;Na Xue","doi":"10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The public radiological risk assessment after severe accidents is considered a reasonable and comprehensive metric to determine the safety of a nuclear power plant, and it has attracted increasing attention since the Fukushima accident. Based on a generic HPR1000 in China, utilizing the source terms of Level-2 PSA and the site hourly meteorological data, individual doses and risks were simulated using a self-developed Level-3 PSA platform. The risk values were compared with the acceptability criteria of US NRC, UK and AR3.1.3. The results show that for both the most frequent and the most severe accident sequences, using the 90th percentile meteorological conditions, the doses are all below the dose limits specified in the Chinese national standard within a 5 km radius from the release point. For each release category, the exceedance frequency corresponding to the 7-day effective dose limit of 50 mSv within 3 km from the site is less than 30 %. The risk of each release category at the site boundary across the average meteorological conditions, and the annual average risks corresponding to the entire accident spectrum at different distances are all less than 10<sup>−8</sup>/reactor year, demonstrating good compliance with international risk acceptance criteria.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19170,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","volume":"432 ","pages":"Article 113779"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549324008793","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The public radiological risk assessment after severe accidents is considered a reasonable and comprehensive metric to determine the safety of a nuclear power plant, and it has attracted increasing attention since the Fukushima accident. Based on a generic HPR1000 in China, utilizing the source terms of Level-2 PSA and the site hourly meteorological data, individual doses and risks were simulated using a self-developed Level-3 PSA platform. The risk values were compared with the acceptability criteria of US NRC, UK and AR3.1.3. The results show that for both the most frequent and the most severe accident sequences, using the 90th percentile meteorological conditions, the doses are all below the dose limits specified in the Chinese national standard within a 5 km radius from the release point. For each release category, the exceedance frequency corresponding to the 7-day effective dose limit of 50 mSv within 3 km from the site is less than 30 %. The risk of each release category at the site boundary across the average meteorological conditions, and the annual average risks corresponding to the entire accident spectrum at different distances are all less than 10−8/reactor year, demonstrating good compliance with international risk acceptance criteria.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国仿制药HPR1000的公众辐射风险评估
重大事故后公众辐射风险评估被认为是判断核电站安全性的一种合理、全面的指标,自福岛核事故以来,公众辐射风险评估越来越受到人们的关注。基于中国通用HPR1000,利用2级PSA源项和站点逐时气象数据,利用自主开发的3级PSA平台模拟个体剂量和风险。将风险值与美国NRC、英国AR3.1.3的可接受标准进行比较。结果表明,在90百分位气象条件下,最频繁和最严重的事故序列中,释放点半径5公里范围内的剂量均低于中国国家标准规定的剂量限值。对于每个释放类别,在距离场址3公里范围内,与50msv 7天有效剂量限值对应的超标频率小于30%。场区边界各释放类别跨越平均气象条件的风险,以及不同距离下整个事故谱对应的年平均风险均小于10−8/堆年,符合国际风险接受标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Nuclear Engineering and Design 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
377
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Nuclear Engineering and Design covers the wide range of disciplines involved in the engineering, design, safety and construction of nuclear fission reactors. The Editors welcome papers both on applied and innovative aspects and developments in nuclear science and technology. Fundamentals of Reactor Design include: • Thermal-Hydraulics and Core Physics • Safety Analysis, Risk Assessment (PSA) • Structural and Mechanical Engineering • Materials Science • Fuel Behavior and Design • Structural Plant Design • Engineering of Reactor Components • Experiments Aspects beyond fundamentals of Reactor Design covered: • Accident Mitigation Measures • Reactor Control Systems • Licensing Issues • Safeguard Engineering • Economy of Plants • Reprocessing / Waste Disposal • Applications of Nuclear Energy • Maintenance • Decommissioning Papers on new reactor ideas and developments (Generation IV reactors) such as inherently safe modular HTRs, High Performance LWRs/HWRs and LMFBs/GFR will be considered; Actinide Burners, Accelerator Driven Systems, Energy Amplifiers and other special designs of power and research reactors and their applications are also encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of risk-important LOCA sequences in NuScale considering accident tolerant fuels High-fidelity turbulence simulation for the OECD–NEA cold-leg mixing benchmark Development of a GPU-accelerated SN-DGM/JFNK full-core neutron transport solver with upwind sweeping and double-buffered strategy Neutronic and economic assessment of FeCrAl in CAREM 25 fuel cycle A Modelica subchannel code for liquid metal fast reactors: Development, validation, and auxiliary model sensitivity analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1