A tutorial on Bayesian item response theory: An illustration using the Teacher Stress Inventory-Short Form

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of School Psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101427
Sonja D. Winter , Colleen L. Eddy , Wenxi Yang , Wes Bonifay
{"title":"A tutorial on Bayesian item response theory: An illustration using the Teacher Stress Inventory-Short Form","authors":"Sonja D. Winter ,&nbsp;Colleen L. Eddy ,&nbsp;Wenxi Yang ,&nbsp;Wes Bonifay","doi":"10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Item Response Theory (IRT) is commonly used in educational assessments to model the relationship between one or more latent traits and the observed responses. Traditional IRT methods often rely on frequentist approaches, which can be limited by assumptions and computational constraints. This article aims to introduce school psychology researchers to Bayesian methods for IRT analyses, highlighting their advantages over traditional approaches. We provide an overview of Bayesian IRT and discuss key concepts that make up the Bayesian workflow. This workflow includes model and prior specification, prior predictive checks, model estimation and comparison, posterior distribution interpretation, posterior predictive checks, and prior sensitivity analyses. To illustrate this workflow, we used a sample of 329 teachers who completed the 16-item Teacher Stress Inventory – Short Form (TSI-SF). Our Bayesian IRT analysis revealed that the TSI-SF is best represented by a three-correlated-traits model (measuring Discipline and Motivation, Professional Investment, and Work-Related Stress as sources of stress).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48232,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Psychology","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 101427"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002244052400147X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Item Response Theory (IRT) is commonly used in educational assessments to model the relationship between one or more latent traits and the observed responses. Traditional IRT methods often rely on frequentist approaches, which can be limited by assumptions and computational constraints. This article aims to introduce school psychology researchers to Bayesian methods for IRT analyses, highlighting their advantages over traditional approaches. We provide an overview of Bayesian IRT and discuss key concepts that make up the Bayesian workflow. This workflow includes model and prior specification, prior predictive checks, model estimation and comparison, posterior distribution interpretation, posterior predictive checks, and prior sensitivity analyses. To illustrate this workflow, we used a sample of 329 teachers who completed the 16-item Teacher Stress Inventory – Short Form (TSI-SF). Our Bayesian IRT analysis revealed that the TSI-SF is best represented by a three-correlated-traits model (measuring Discipline and Motivation, Professional Investment, and Work-Related Stress as sources of stress).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of School Psychology
Journal of School Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The Journal of School Psychology publishes original empirical articles and critical reviews of the literature on research and practices relevant to psychological and behavioral processes in school settings. JSP presents research on intervention mechanisms and approaches; schooling effects on the development of social, cognitive, mental-health, and achievement-related outcomes; assessment; and consultation. Submissions from a variety of disciplines are encouraged. All manuscripts are read by the Editor and one or more editorial consultants with the intent of providing appropriate and constructive written reviews.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Mixed methods systematic review: Using a cultural validity assessment to evaluate prevention programs for Indigenous students Using a naive Bayesian approach to identify academic risk based on multiple sources: A conceptual replication Learning from learning loss: Bayesian updating in academic universal screening during learning disruptions One model may not fit all: Subgroup detection using model-based recursive partitioning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1