S&P-500 vs. Nasdaq-100 price movement prediction with LSTM for different daily periods

IF 4.9 Machine learning with applications Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1016/j.mlwa.2024.100617
Xiang Zhang, Eugene Pinsky
{"title":"S&P-500 vs. Nasdaq-100 price movement prediction with LSTM for different daily periods","authors":"Xiang Zhang,&nbsp;Eugene Pinsky","doi":"10.1016/j.mlwa.2024.100617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores the efficiency of LSTM neural networks in predicting price movements for the two major U.S. stock indices: the S&amp;P-500 and the Nasdaq-100 index. We consider three distinct daily periods: “overnight” (Close-to-Open), “daytime” (Open-to-Close) and “24-hour” (Close-to-Close) trading sessions. Using historical pricing data for these indices since 2000, this study shows how well the standard LSTM model captures price movement patterns to improve short-term trading strategies. The findings reveal that, for the S&amp;P-500, a one-year training with 24-hour periods delivers a 14.5% more return over the Buy-and-Hold strategy. Moreover, combining “overnight” and “daytime” strategies delivers more than 40% return compared to passive index investing. By contrast, for the Nasdaq-100, a shorter training period of three months for “24-hour” periods delivers 90% more return than passive index investing. These results suggest that LSTM effectively learns the unique market dynamics associated with each index and different time periods, offering further insights into how deep learning can enhance financial forecasting and trading opportunities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74093,"journal":{"name":"Machine learning with applications","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100617"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Machine learning with applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666827024000938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the efficiency of LSTM neural networks in predicting price movements for the two major U.S. stock indices: the S&P-500 and the Nasdaq-100 index. We consider three distinct daily periods: “overnight” (Close-to-Open), “daytime” (Open-to-Close) and “24-hour” (Close-to-Close) trading sessions. Using historical pricing data for these indices since 2000, this study shows how well the standard LSTM model captures price movement patterns to improve short-term trading strategies. The findings reveal that, for the S&P-500, a one-year training with 24-hour periods delivers a 14.5% more return over the Buy-and-Hold strategy. Moreover, combining “overnight” and “daytime” strategies delivers more than 40% return compared to passive index investing. By contrast, for the Nasdaq-100, a shorter training period of three months for “24-hour” periods delivers 90% more return than passive index investing. These results suggest that LSTM effectively learns the unique market dynamics associated with each index and different time periods, offering further insights into how deep learning can enhance financial forecasting and trading opportunities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用LSTM预测标准普尔500指数与纳斯达克100指数不同日周期的价格走势
本文探讨了LSTM神经网络在预测美国两大股票指数(标准普尔500指数和纳斯达克100指数)价格变动方面的效率。我们考虑三个不同的每日时段:“隔夜”(收盘价)、“日间”(开盘收盘价)和“24小时”(收盘价)交易时段。利用2000年以来这些指数的历史价格数据,本研究显示了标准LSTM模型如何很好地捕捉价格运动模式,以改善短期交易策略。研究结果显示,对于标普500指数,为期一年、24小时的培训比“买入并持有”策略的回报率高出14.5%。此外,与被动指数投资相比,结合“隔夜”和“日间”策略的回报率超过40%。相比之下,对于纳斯达克100指数而言,为期三个月的“24小时”培训比被动指数投资的回报率高出90%。这些结果表明,LSTM有效地学习了与每个指数和不同时间段相关的独特市场动态,为深度学习如何增强财务预测和交易机会提供了进一步的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Machine learning with applications
Machine learning with applications Management Science and Operations Research, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
98 days
期刊最新文献
Quantum-inspired bi-level neuro-swarm optimization for UAV-based disaster recognition and response An unsupervised pipeline for class-agnostic object detection using self-supervised vision transformers and Kolmogorov–Arnold Networks Group-based learning on label-free phase-contrast images across dose and exposure time improves bioactive compound classification A deep reinforcement learning approach for emotion recognition from unaligned multimodal inputs Optimizing investment horizons: Machine learning applications in technical analysis of the WIG20 index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1