Unified wound diagnostic framework for wound segmentation and classification

Mustafa Alhababi , Gregory Auner , Hafiz Malik , Muteb Aljasem , Zaid Aldoulah
{"title":"Unified wound diagnostic framework for wound segmentation and classification","authors":"Mustafa Alhababi ,&nbsp;Gregory Auner ,&nbsp;Hafiz Malik ,&nbsp;Muteb Aljasem ,&nbsp;Zaid Aldoulah","doi":"10.1016/j.mlwa.2024.100616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Chronic wounds affect millions worldwide, posing significant challenges for healthcare systems and a heavy economic burden globally. The segmentation and classification (S&amp;C) of chronic wounds are critical for wound care management and diagnosis, aiding clinicians in selecting appropriate treatments. Existing approaches have utilized either traditional machine learning or deep learning methods for S&amp;C. However, most focus on binary classification, with few addressing multi-class classification, often showing degraded performance for pressure and diabetic wounds. Wound segmentation has been largely limited to foot ulcer images, and there is no unified diagnostic tool for both S&amp;C tasks. To address these gaps, we developed a unified approach that performs S&amp;C simultaneously. For segmentation, we proposed Attention-Dense-UNet (Att-<span>d</span>-UNet), and for classification, we introduced a feature concatenation-based method. Our framework segments wound images using Att-<span>d</span>-UNet, followed by classification into one of the wound types using our proposed method. We evaluated our models on publicly available wound classification datasets (AZH and Medetec) and segmentation datasets (FUSeg and AZH). To test our unified approach, we extended wound classification datasets by generating segmentation masks for Medetec and AZH images. The proposed unified approach achieved 90% accuracy and an 86.55% dice score on the Medetec dataset and 81% accuracy and an 86.53% dice score on the AZH dataset These results demonstrate the effectiveness of our separate models and unified approach for wound S&amp;C.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74093,"journal":{"name":"Machine learning with applications","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100616"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Machine learning with applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666827024000926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic wounds affect millions worldwide, posing significant challenges for healthcare systems and a heavy economic burden globally. The segmentation and classification (S&C) of chronic wounds are critical for wound care management and diagnosis, aiding clinicians in selecting appropriate treatments. Existing approaches have utilized either traditional machine learning or deep learning methods for S&C. However, most focus on binary classification, with few addressing multi-class classification, often showing degraded performance for pressure and diabetic wounds. Wound segmentation has been largely limited to foot ulcer images, and there is no unified diagnostic tool for both S&C tasks. To address these gaps, we developed a unified approach that performs S&C simultaneously. For segmentation, we proposed Attention-Dense-UNet (Att-d-UNet), and for classification, we introduced a feature concatenation-based method. Our framework segments wound images using Att-d-UNet, followed by classification into one of the wound types using our proposed method. We evaluated our models on publicly available wound classification datasets (AZH and Medetec) and segmentation datasets (FUSeg and AZH). To test our unified approach, we extended wound classification datasets by generating segmentation masks for Medetec and AZH images. The proposed unified approach achieved 90% accuracy and an 86.55% dice score on the Medetec dataset and 81% accuracy and an 86.53% dice score on the AZH dataset These results demonstrate the effectiveness of our separate models and unified approach for wound S&C.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Machine learning with applications
Machine learning with applications Management Science and Operations Research, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
98 days
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Machine learning for sports betting: should model selection be based on accuracy or calibration?” [Machine Learning with Applications Volume 16, June 2024, 100539] Key technical indicators for stock market prediction Machine learning-driven predictive modeling of mechanical properties in diverse steels Application of machine learning for seam profile identification in robotic welding Uncertainty quantification based on symbolic regression and probabilistic programming and its application
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1