Effects of metacognition on school attendance: Assessing variation across latent profiles of school refusal behavior

IF 4.5 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Thinking Skills and Creativity Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101733
Carolina Gonzálvez , M.Begoña Alfageme-González , M.Trinidad Cutanda-López
{"title":"Effects of metacognition on school attendance: Assessing variation across latent profiles of school refusal behavior","authors":"Carolina Gonzálvez ,&nbsp;M.Begoña Alfageme-González ,&nbsp;M.Trinidad Cutanda-López","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although poor cognitive abilities in children have been related to academic achievement difficulties, little is known about the effect of metacognitive skills on school attendance. The aim of this work is to identify School Refusal Behavior (SRB) profiles in a community sample of Spanish children and to examine whether these profiles differ with respect to four metacognition dimensions (Positive Metacognition; Negative Metacognition; Superstition, Punishment and Responsibility beliefs; and Cognitive Monitoring). Participants were 727 Spanish students (50.9 % girls) aged 8 to 12 (<em>M</em> = 10.16; <em>SD</em> = 1.17). They completed the School Refusal Assessment Scale-Revised and the Metacognitive Questionnaire for Children. Three SRB profiles were found using the Latent Profile Analysis technique: Non-SRB profile, SRB profile to avoid negative affectivity and seek attention, and SRB profile to avoid negative affectivity, escape from social and/or evaluative situations, and seek attention. Statistically significant differences were identified among the three groups on all of the metacognition dimensions examined. The non-SRB group reported higher scores on Positive Metacognition as compared to the other profiles. The largest effect sizes were found between the SRB profile to avoid negative affectivity, escape from social and/or evaluative situations, and seek attention and the non-SRB profile. Intervention strategies are suggested to be used with the at-risk SRB profiles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 101733"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187124002748","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although poor cognitive abilities in children have been related to academic achievement difficulties, little is known about the effect of metacognitive skills on school attendance. The aim of this work is to identify School Refusal Behavior (SRB) profiles in a community sample of Spanish children and to examine whether these profiles differ with respect to four metacognition dimensions (Positive Metacognition; Negative Metacognition; Superstition, Punishment and Responsibility beliefs; and Cognitive Monitoring). Participants were 727 Spanish students (50.9 % girls) aged 8 to 12 (M = 10.16; SD = 1.17). They completed the School Refusal Assessment Scale-Revised and the Metacognitive Questionnaire for Children. Three SRB profiles were found using the Latent Profile Analysis technique: Non-SRB profile, SRB profile to avoid negative affectivity and seek attention, and SRB profile to avoid negative affectivity, escape from social and/or evaluative situations, and seek attention. Statistically significant differences were identified among the three groups on all of the metacognition dimensions examined. The non-SRB group reported higher scores on Positive Metacognition as compared to the other profiles. The largest effect sizes were found between the SRB profile to avoid negative affectivity, escape from social and/or evaluative situations, and seek attention and the non-SRB profile. Intervention strategies are suggested to be used with the at-risk SRB profiles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
元认知对出勤率的影响:评估拒学行为潜在特征的差异
虽然儿童认知能力差与学业成绩困难有关,但人们对元认知技能对出勤率的影响知之甚少。这项工作的目的是在西班牙儿童的社区样本中确定拒绝上学行为(SRB)概况,并检查这些概况是否在四个元认知维度(积极元认知;-元认知;迷信、惩罚与责任信念认知监测)。参与者为727名8至12岁的西班牙学生(50.9%为女孩)(M = 10.16;Sd = 1.17)。完成《拒绝入学评定量表-修订版》和《儿童元认知问卷》。利用潜在侧写分析技术发现了三种SRB侧写:非SRB侧写、逃避负性情感和寻求关注的SRB侧写和逃避负性情感、逃避社会和/或评价情境和寻求关注的SRB侧写。统计上,三组在所有元认知维度上都有显著差异。与其他组相比,非srb组在积极元认知方面的得分更高。在避免负面情绪、逃避社会和/或评价情境、寻求关注等方面,SRB特征与非SRB特征之间的影响最大。建议干预策略与高危SRB概况一起使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
期刊最新文献
Factors and pathways of AIGC tools' associations with university students' creative expression—A hybrid method based on SEM and fsQCA The impact of virtual reality-assisted learning on students' critical thinking: A meta-analysis of 37 experimental and quasi-experimental studies The impact of toolkit-based maker activity model (IPRCV model) on senior high school students' maker literacy and learning experiences: A quasi-experimental study Fostering Critical Thinking Through STEM Undergraduate Research: Mechanisms and Challenges in a Chinese Research University An inquiry method for critical thinking instruction in the Iranian EFL context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1