Disparities in breast cancer screening and diagnosis: Urban-suburban contrasts in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Clinical Imaging Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.clinimag.2025.110419
Sarah Ciccarelli , Natalia Eugene , Zi Zhang
{"title":"Disparities in breast cancer screening and diagnosis: Urban-suburban contrasts in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Sarah Ciccarelli ,&nbsp;Natalia Eugene ,&nbsp;Zi Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2025.110419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Compare the reduction and recovery of breast cancer screening and diagnostic services in urban versus suburban communities during the COVID-19 pandemic to identify opportunities for advancing equitable breast cancer detection.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study used the Montage™ data mining system to analyze percent change in the number of screening and diagnostic mammograms, breast biopsies, and breast cancer diagnoses at a single mid-Atlantic institution with urban and suburban sites centered in and around Philadelphia, Pennsylvania from 1/1/2019 to 12/31/2022, with urban-suburban subset comparison from 1/1/2019 to 12/31/2021.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In 2020, screening mammogram volume dropped 23.9 % at urban sites and 1.6 % at suburban sites while diagnostic mammogram volume decreased 26.4 % at urban and 21.4 % at suburban sites. In 2021, screening volume at urban and suburban sites was 2.6 % and 31.0 % greater than pre-pandemic levels, and diagnostic volume was 28.5 % and 16.9 % below pre-pandemic levels. That same year, the proportion of invasive ductal carcinoma at urban sites increased by 26.2 %. In 2022, screening volume at all sites surpassed pre-pandemic levels by 19.5 % while diagnostic volume remained 21.7 % less than pre-pandemic levels.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately reduced breast cancer screening and diagnostic services in urban communities, who experienced slower recovery and increased invasive breast cancer in the subsequent year. Throughout our institution, screening mammograms surpassed pre-pandemic levels in 2021 and 2022 while diagnostic services remained below pre-pandemic levels through 2022. Considering these findings, we must improve access to breast cancer screening and diagnosis to mitigate the long-term consequences of the pandemic.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 110419"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707125000191","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Compare the reduction and recovery of breast cancer screening and diagnostic services in urban versus suburban communities during the COVID-19 pandemic to identify opportunities for advancing equitable breast cancer detection.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study used the Montage™ data mining system to analyze percent change in the number of screening and diagnostic mammograms, breast biopsies, and breast cancer diagnoses at a single mid-Atlantic institution with urban and suburban sites centered in and around Philadelphia, Pennsylvania from 1/1/2019 to 12/31/2022, with urban-suburban subset comparison from 1/1/2019 to 12/31/2021.

Results

In 2020, screening mammogram volume dropped 23.9 % at urban sites and 1.6 % at suburban sites while diagnostic mammogram volume decreased 26.4 % at urban and 21.4 % at suburban sites. In 2021, screening volume at urban and suburban sites was 2.6 % and 31.0 % greater than pre-pandemic levels, and diagnostic volume was 28.5 % and 16.9 % below pre-pandemic levels. That same year, the proportion of invasive ductal carcinoma at urban sites increased by 26.2 %. In 2022, screening volume at all sites surpassed pre-pandemic levels by 19.5 % while diagnostic volume remained 21.7 % less than pre-pandemic levels.

Conclusion

The COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately reduced breast cancer screening and diagnostic services in urban communities, who experienced slower recovery and increased invasive breast cancer in the subsequent year. Throughout our institution, screening mammograms surpassed pre-pandemic levels in 2021 and 2022 while diagnostic services remained below pre-pandemic levels through 2022. Considering these findings, we must improve access to breast cancer screening and diagnosis to mitigate the long-term consequences of the pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳腺癌筛查和诊断的差异:2019冠状病毒病大流行后城市和郊区的对比
目的比较2019冠状病毒病大流行期间城市与郊区社区乳腺癌筛查和诊断服务的减少和恢复情况,以确定促进公平乳腺癌检测的机会。方法:本回顾性队列研究使用蒙太奇™数据挖掘系统,分析2019年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间,位于宾夕法尼亚州费城及其周边城市和郊区的单个大西洋中部机构的筛查和诊断乳房x线照片、乳腺活检和乳腺癌诊断数量的百分比变化,并进行2019年1月1日至2021年12月31日的城市-郊区亚群比较。结果2020年,城市乳房x线片筛查量下降了23.9%,郊区下降了1.6%;城市乳房x线片诊断量下降了26.4%,郊区下降了21.4%。2021年,城市和郊区站点的筛查量比大流行前的水平分别高出2.6%和31.0%,诊断量比大流行前的水平分别低28.5%和16.9%。同年,城市地区浸润性导管癌的比例增加了26.2%。2022年,所有地点的筛查量比大流行前水平高出19.5%,而诊断量仍比大流行前水平低21.7%。结论2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行不成比例地减少了城市社区的乳腺癌筛查和诊断服务,在随后的一年里,城市社区的乳腺癌恢复速度较慢,浸润性乳腺癌增加。在我们整个机构,乳房x光筛查在2021年和2022年超过了大流行前的水平,而诊断服务在2022年仍低于大流行前的水平。考虑到这些发现,我们必须改善获得乳腺癌筛查和诊断的机会,以减轻这一流行病的长期后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Imaging
Clinical Imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
265
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include: -Body Imaging- Breast Imaging- Cardiothoracic Imaging- Imaging Physics and Informatics- Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine- Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging- Neuroradiology- Practice, Policy & Education- Pediatric Imaging- Vascular and Interventional Radiology
期刊最新文献
I saw a different “bunch of grapes” sign in two patients with neurotuberculosis Determining size in an era when size matters: Interobserver comparison of CT lung tumor size measurements and accuracy of radiologic size estimation compared to pathologic size Exploring plantar aponeurosis disorders: beyond the classics Toward clinically robust radiomics models for PD-L1 prediction in lung cancer Multimodality imaging features and surgical correlation of fetus in fetu: An retrospective study with long-term follow-up
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1