A file archival integrity check method based on the BiLSTM + CNN model and deep learning

IF 5 3区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Egyptian Informatics Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1016/j.eij.2024.100597
Jinxun Li, Tingjun Wang, Chao Ma, Yunxuan Lin, Qing Yan
{"title":"A file archival integrity check method based on the BiLSTM + CNN model and deep learning","authors":"Jinxun Li,&nbsp;Tingjun Wang,&nbsp;Chao Ma,&nbsp;Yunxuan Lin,&nbsp;Qing Yan","doi":"10.1016/j.eij.2024.100597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Validating and integrity-checking archives ensures that files are authentic, trustworthy, and usable. In the age of digital technology, historical records must be genuine. Researching in archives raises ethical issues while having little to do with individuals. Traditional archive integrity solutions have scaling issues, real-time monitoring issues, and missed opportunities. An updated Archive File Integrity Check Method (AFICM) may solve these issues, and the paper explains it. Deep learning allows the combination of a Bidirectional Long-Short Term Memory (Bi-LSTM) with adaptive gating and an adaptive Temporal Convolutional Neural Network (TCNN) with multi-scale temporal attention. This method protects archived material against manipulation, which is crucial. The recommended method extracts complex sequential patterns and variants using adaptive TCNN trained on file data. Next, it analyzes these features using a Bi-LSTM network and attenuation method. It allows it to highlight significant temporal correlations while downplaying irrelevant data selectively. The hybrid model outperforms checksums in accuracy and dependability. It uses adaptive TCNNs for time-related feature extraction and attenuated Bi-LSTM for refinement. The F1 score, recall, accuracy, precision, and AU-ROC are critical measures for model evaluation. The AICM performed well overall, with 97.32% precision and 98.95% accuracy. This integrity check method outperforms others with an F1 score of 97.58, an AU-ROC of 0.983, and a recall rate of 98.18%. The findings set a new standard for archiving system integrity testing by showing the model’s dependability and security in several use scenarios.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56010,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Informatics Journal","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 100597"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110866524001609","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Validating and integrity-checking archives ensures that files are authentic, trustworthy, and usable. In the age of digital technology, historical records must be genuine. Researching in archives raises ethical issues while having little to do with individuals. Traditional archive integrity solutions have scaling issues, real-time monitoring issues, and missed opportunities. An updated Archive File Integrity Check Method (AFICM) may solve these issues, and the paper explains it. Deep learning allows the combination of a Bidirectional Long-Short Term Memory (Bi-LSTM) with adaptive gating and an adaptive Temporal Convolutional Neural Network (TCNN) with multi-scale temporal attention. This method protects archived material against manipulation, which is crucial. The recommended method extracts complex sequential patterns and variants using adaptive TCNN trained on file data. Next, it analyzes these features using a Bi-LSTM network and attenuation method. It allows it to highlight significant temporal correlations while downplaying irrelevant data selectively. The hybrid model outperforms checksums in accuracy and dependability. It uses adaptive TCNNs for time-related feature extraction and attenuated Bi-LSTM for refinement. The F1 score, recall, accuracy, precision, and AU-ROC are critical measures for model evaluation. The AICM performed well overall, with 97.32% precision and 98.95% accuracy. This integrity check method outperforms others with an F1 score of 97.58, an AU-ROC of 0.983, and a recall rate of 98.18%. The findings set a new standard for archiving system integrity testing by showing the model’s dependability and security in several use scenarios.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Egyptian Informatics Journal
Egyptian Informatics Journal Decision Sciences-Management Science and Operations Research
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
1.90%
发文量
59
审稿时长
110 days
期刊介绍: The Egyptian Informatics Journal is published by the Faculty of Computers and Artificial Intelligence, Cairo University. This Journal provides a forum for the state-of-the-art research and development in the fields of computing, including computer sciences, information technologies, information systems, operations research and decision support. Innovative and not-previously-published work in subjects covered by the Journal is encouraged to be submitted, whether from academic, research or commercial sources.
期刊最新文献
Multistep prediction for egg prices: An efficient sequence-to-sequence network A multi-objective fuzzy model based on enhanced artificial fish Swarm for multiple RNA sequences alignment A road lane detection approach based on reformer model Advanced segmentation method for integrating multi-omics data for early cancer detection Innovation of teaching mechanism of music course integrating artificial intelligence technology: ITMMCAI-MCA-ACNN approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1