Identifying Nutritional Inequities of Patients with Cancer Residing in Food Deserts

IF 2.7 Q3 ONCOLOGY Advances in Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.adro.2024.101641
Lara LePore BS , Dahlia Kronfli MD , Kaysee Baker MS , Caitlin Eggleston BS , Kaitlin Schotz RD, LDN, CSO , Amber S. Kleckner PhD , Søren M. Bentzen PhD, DMSc, FASTRO , Pranshu Mohindra MD, MBBS , Melissa A.L. Vyfhuis MD, PhD
{"title":"Identifying Nutritional Inequities of Patients with Cancer Residing in Food Deserts","authors":"Lara LePore BS ,&nbsp;Dahlia Kronfli MD ,&nbsp;Kaysee Baker MS ,&nbsp;Caitlin Eggleston BS ,&nbsp;Kaitlin Schotz RD, LDN, CSO ,&nbsp;Amber S. Kleckner PhD ,&nbsp;Søren M. Bentzen PhD, DMSc, FASTRO ,&nbsp;Pranshu Mohindra MD, MBBS ,&nbsp;Melissa A.L. Vyfhuis MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Nutrition is essential for cancer care, and patients who reside in food priority areas (FPAs) may experience limited access to healthy meals. There are few data evaluating the consequence of residing in FPAs because it relates to perceived food insecurity, psychosocial needs, or nutritional status of patients with cancer. This study aimed to determine the nutritional and psychosocial needs of patients with cancer who do and do not reside in FPAs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>From May 2019 to December 2022, a cross-sectional analysis was conducted using a validated questionnaire, offered at various time points before and after therapy, evaluating the psychosocial needs of patients with curable cancers. Groups were compared using X<sup>2</sup> and Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> tests as appropriate. Binary logistic regression was used to identify predictors of food insecurity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Survey compliance was 74% (n = 320 of 434 patients). Patients who resided in FPAs (26%; n = 114) were more likely to self-identify as Black (60.5% vs 39.5%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001), single (70% vs 37%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001), and have a lower median income ($47,225 vs $91,305; <em>P</em> &lt; .001) when compared with non-FPA residents. Residents of FPAs had a higher unmet nutritional needs index (median nutritional unmet needs score: 2.42 vs 2.00; <em>P</em> = .003), which included higher demands for healthier food choices (67.6% vs 54.4; <em>P</em> = .047) and greater food insecurity (44.4% vs 19.9%; <em>P</em> = .002). FPA residence was associated with a 3-fold increased risk of food insecurity (odds ratio [OR], 3.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.59-6.57; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). On multivariate analysis, predictors for food insecurity included Black race (OR, 9.46; 95% CI, 3.93-22.76; <em>P</em> &lt; .001), stage (stage IV vs l OR, 4.27; 95% CI, 1.12-16.34; <em>P</em> = .034), and recurrent disease (OR, 10.26; 95% CI, 2.29-46.09; <em>P</em> = .002).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Inequities were identified in patients residing in FPAs, where race and higher stage were important predictors of food insecurity. Demographics can be readily used by clinicians to identify high-risk patients early in their cancer care in order to provide continuous nutritional resources to improve food insecurity perceptions. Future prospective studies are needed to confirm if such interventions improve cancer outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"10 1","pages":"Article 101641"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424002045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Nutrition is essential for cancer care, and patients who reside in food priority areas (FPAs) may experience limited access to healthy meals. There are few data evaluating the consequence of residing in FPAs because it relates to perceived food insecurity, psychosocial needs, or nutritional status of patients with cancer. This study aimed to determine the nutritional and psychosocial needs of patients with cancer who do and do not reside in FPAs.

Methods and Materials

From May 2019 to December 2022, a cross-sectional analysis was conducted using a validated questionnaire, offered at various time points before and after therapy, evaluating the psychosocial needs of patients with curable cancers. Groups were compared using X2 and Mann-Whitney U tests as appropriate. Binary logistic regression was used to identify predictors of food insecurity.

Results

Survey compliance was 74% (n = 320 of 434 patients). Patients who resided in FPAs (26%; n = 114) were more likely to self-identify as Black (60.5% vs 39.5%; P < .001), single (70% vs 37%; P < .001), and have a lower median income ($47,225 vs $91,305; P < .001) when compared with non-FPA residents. Residents of FPAs had a higher unmet nutritional needs index (median nutritional unmet needs score: 2.42 vs 2.00; P = .003), which included higher demands for healthier food choices (67.6% vs 54.4; P = .047) and greater food insecurity (44.4% vs 19.9%; P = .002). FPA residence was associated with a 3-fold increased risk of food insecurity (odds ratio [OR], 3.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.59-6.57; P < .001). On multivariate analysis, predictors for food insecurity included Black race (OR, 9.46; 95% CI, 3.93-22.76; P < .001), stage (stage IV vs l OR, 4.27; 95% CI, 1.12-16.34; P = .034), and recurrent disease (OR, 10.26; 95% CI, 2.29-46.09; P = .002).

Conclusions

Inequities were identified in patients residing in FPAs, where race and higher stage were important predictors of food insecurity. Demographics can be readily used by clinicians to identify high-risk patients early in their cancer care in order to provide continuous nutritional resources to improve food insecurity perceptions. Future prospective studies are needed to confirm if such interventions improve cancer outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
食物沙漠地区癌症患者的营养不平等
营养对癌症治疗至关重要,居住在食物优先区(fpa)的患者可能难以获得健康膳食。很少有数据评估居住在FPAs的后果,因为它涉及到感知到的粮食不安全、社会心理需求或癌症患者的营养状况。本研究旨在确定居住在和不居住在FPAs的癌症患者的营养和心理社会需求。方法与材料2019年5月至2022年12月,在治疗前后的不同时间点,使用经过验证的问卷进行横断面分析,评估可治愈癌症患者的心理社会需求。组间比较酌情采用X2检验和Mann-Whitney U检验。二元逻辑回归用于确定粮食不安全的预测因素。结果434例患者中,依从性为74% (n = 320)。居住在fpa的患者(26%;n = 114)更有可能自我认同为黑人(60.5% vs 39.5%;P & lt;.001),单身(70% vs 37%;P & lt;.001),收入中位数较低(47,225美元vs 91,305美元;P & lt;.001)。fpa居民的未满足营养需求指数较高(营养未满足需求得分中位数:2.42 vs 2.00;P = 0.003),其中包括对健康食品选择的更高需求(67.6% vs 54.4;P = 0.047)和更严重的粮食不安全(44.4% vs 19.9%;P = .002)。FPA居住与食物不安全风险增加3倍相关(优势比[OR], 3.23;95%置信区间[CI], 1.59-6.57;P & lt;措施)。在多变量分析中,粮食不安全的预测因子包括黑人种族(OR, 9.46;95% ci, 3.93-22.76;P & lt;.001),分期(IV期vs l OR, 4.27;95% ci, 1.12-16.34;P = 0.034),复发性疾病(OR, 10.26;95% ci, 2.29-46.09;P = .002)。结论fpa患者存在不公平现象,种族和较高分期是食物不安全的重要预测因素。临床医生可以很容易地利用人口统计数据在癌症治疗的早期识别高风险患者,以便提供持续的营养资源,以改善对粮食不安全的认识。未来的前瞻性研究需要证实这些干预措施是否能改善癌症预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Radiation Oncology
Advances in Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.
期刊最新文献
Feasibility and Outcomes of Perirectal Spacer Implantation in Previously Treated Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Salvage Proton Therapy Radiation Kupffer Cell-Derived Interleukin-6 Aggravates Radiation-Induced Liver Disease by Activating Hepatocyte STAT3 to Promote Ccng1 Transcription. Sexual Toxicity After Chemoradiation for Anal Cancer Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Mixed-Methods Analysis Exploring the Use of Boron Neutron Capture Therapy for Recurrent Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases: A Case Series. Clinical Implementation of Simulation-Free Palliative Radiation Therapy: Consensus Recommendations From a Modified Delphi Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1