Supports and barriers to creating and implementing person-centred plans in the community care sector in Canada: A qualitative analysis of three perspectives

SSM - Health Systems Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-18 DOI:10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100054
Samina Idrees , Megann Dong , Gillian Young , Leslie Meredith , Dana Ryan , Yona Lunsky , Maria Mathews
{"title":"Supports and barriers to creating and implementing person-centred plans in the community care sector in Canada: A qualitative analysis of three perspectives","authors":"Samina Idrees ,&nbsp;Megann Dong ,&nbsp;Gillian Young ,&nbsp;Leslie Meredith ,&nbsp;Dana Ryan ,&nbsp;Yona Lunsky ,&nbsp;Maria Mathews","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The community care sector manages the delivery of health and social services in people’s homes and local communities. The sector supports individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities, physical disabilities, and complex medical needs. Person-centred plans (PCPs) have been recognized as evidence-based practice across various care settings, however there is limited literature on the factors impacting this process. This study aims to identify the supports and barriers to creating and implementing PCPs in the community care sector.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We partnered with PHSS, a not-for-profit community care organization based in Ontario, Canada. We conducted a total of 42 semi-structured interviews, 18 with persons receiving care (i.e., persons-supported) at PHSS, 1 with a family member of a person-supported, 11 with frontline staff at PHSS, and 12 with representatives from different community care organizations in Ontario, Canada. We asked participants about the PCP process at their organization, including relevant supports and barriers. We analyzed the data thematically, using a pragmatic, qualitative, descriptive approach.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified four key factors impacting the creation and implementation of PCPs: (1) the health and capacity of the person-supported, (2) community care sector challenges, (3) integration across community care and health sectors, and (4) community connections, accessibility, and inclusion. Participants described how the health and capacity of the person-supported could impact the PCP process, particularly for individuals who were non-speaking or had difficulty communicating. Inadequate funding and staffing were described as community care sector challenges. Participants also described a need for increased integration with other sectors including acute care systems. Strong connections with the community were integral to implementing PCPs; participants also encountered barriers to inclusion and accessibility.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The creation and implementation of PCPs is impacted by individual health and capacity, organizational funding and staffing, intersectoral integration, and broader community factors. These findings highlight the importance of addressing challenges through targeted intervention strategies designed to optimize PCP creation and implementation and ensure equitable outcomes across diverse populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101183,"journal":{"name":"SSM - Health Systems","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100054"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM - Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949856225000066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The community care sector manages the delivery of health and social services in people’s homes and local communities. The sector supports individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities, physical disabilities, and complex medical needs. Person-centred plans (PCPs) have been recognized as evidence-based practice across various care settings, however there is limited literature on the factors impacting this process. This study aims to identify the supports and barriers to creating and implementing PCPs in the community care sector.

Methods

We partnered with PHSS, a not-for-profit community care organization based in Ontario, Canada. We conducted a total of 42 semi-structured interviews, 18 with persons receiving care (i.e., persons-supported) at PHSS, 1 with a family member of a person-supported, 11 with frontline staff at PHSS, and 12 with representatives from different community care organizations in Ontario, Canada. We asked participants about the PCP process at their organization, including relevant supports and barriers. We analyzed the data thematically, using a pragmatic, qualitative, descriptive approach.

Results

We identified four key factors impacting the creation and implementation of PCPs: (1) the health and capacity of the person-supported, (2) community care sector challenges, (3) integration across community care and health sectors, and (4) community connections, accessibility, and inclusion. Participants described how the health and capacity of the person-supported could impact the PCP process, particularly for individuals who were non-speaking or had difficulty communicating. Inadequate funding and staffing were described as community care sector challenges. Participants also described a need for increased integration with other sectors including acute care systems. Strong connections with the community were integral to implementing PCPs; participants also encountered barriers to inclusion and accessibility.

Conclusions

The creation and implementation of PCPs is impacted by individual health and capacity, organizational funding and staffing, intersectoral integration, and broader community factors. These findings highlight the importance of addressing challenges through targeted intervention strategies designed to optimize PCP creation and implementation and ensure equitable outcomes across diverse populations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大社区护理部门制定和实施以人为本计划的支持和障碍:三个视角的定性分析
背景社区护理部门管理在人们家中和当地社区提供的保健和社会服务。该部门为智力和发育残疾、身体残疾和有复杂医疗需求的个人提供支持。以人为本的计划(pcp)已被公认为在各种护理环境中以证据为基础的实践,然而,关于影响这一过程的因素的文献有限。本研究旨在找出在社区护理部门建立和实施pcp的支持和障碍。方法我们与加拿大安大略省的非营利社区护理组织PHSS合作。我们共进行了42次半结构化访谈,其中18次访谈对象是在公共福利院接受照顾(即受照顾者)的人,1次访谈对象是受照顾者的家庭成员,11次访谈对象是公共福利院的一线员工,12次访谈对象是加拿大安大略省不同社区护理机构的代表。我们向参与者询问了他们组织的PCP过程,包括相关的支持和障碍。我们使用实用的、定性的、描述性的方法对数据进行了主题分析。结果我们确定了影响pcp创建和实施的四个关键因素:(1)个人支持的健康和能力;(2)社区护理部门的挑战;(3)社区护理和卫生部门之间的整合;(4)社区联系、可及性和包容性。与会者描述了被支持人的健康和能力如何影响PCP过程,特别是对那些不会说话或有沟通困难的人。资金和人员不足被认为是社区保健部门面临的挑战。与会者还描述了加强与包括急症护理系统在内的其他部门整合的必要性。与社区的紧密联系是实施公私合作计划的必要条件;与会者还遇到了包容和无障碍方面的障碍。结论pcp的创建和实施受到个人健康和能力、组织资金和人员配备、部门间整合和更广泛的社区因素的影响。这些发现强调了通过有针对性的干预策略来应对挑战的重要性,这些策略旨在优化PCP的创建和实施,并确保在不同人群中获得公平的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Challenging gender norms through participatory action research: A cross-country study of women close-to-community healthcare providers in fragile settings Co-developing Canadian hospital research tracking criteria: Findings from a National Consensus Building Meeting using the nominal group technique Assessing clinical networks through evidence: an empirical analysis of the effectiveness of cancer networks in improving patients’ quality of care and survival Breaking barriers to access to sexual and reproductive health for migrant women in Castel Volturno, Italy: Combining a public health with an anthropological perspective Early identification and referral of children with disabilities in Mainland Tanzania: A qualitative study using the system level analysis approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1